From: Graeme Smecher <gsmecher@threespeedlogic.com>
To: unlisted-recipients:; (no To-header on input)
Cc: Graeme Smecher <gsmecher@threespeedlogic.com>,
Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@ti.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>,
Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo@kernel.org>,
Shay Agroskin <shayagr@amazon.com>, Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
Yang Yingliang <yangyingliang@huawei.com>,
Marek Majtyka <alardam@gmail.com>,
linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] net: ti/cpsw_new: Expose the same module parameters as ti/cpsw.
Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2023 14:13:21 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230814211323.3272487-1-gsmecher@threespeedlogic.com> (raw)
The "old" CPSW driver (cpsw.c) exports the following module parameters:
- ti_cpsw.debug_level
- ti_cpsw.ale_ageout
- ti_cpsw.rx_packet_max
- ti_cpsw.descs_pool_size
This patch exposes the same parameters for the "new" CPSW driver:
- ti_cpsw_new.debug_level
- ti_cpsw_new.ale_ageout
- ti_cpsw_new.rx_packet_max
- ti_cpsw_new.descs_pool_size
It seems like consistency between the two drivers is a reasonable goal.
Signed-off-by: Graeme Smecher <gsmecher@threespeedlogic.com>
---
drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw_new.c | 11 +++++++++++
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw_new.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw_new.c
index c61e4e44a78f..6d05ec288792 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw_new.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw_new.c
@@ -45,9 +45,20 @@
#include <net/pkt_sched.h>
static int debug_level;
+module_param(debug_level, int, 0);
+MODULE_PARM_DESC(debug_level, "cpsw debug level (NETIF_MSG bits)");
+
static int ale_ageout = CPSW_ALE_AGEOUT_DEFAULT;
+module_param(ale_ageout, int, 0);
+MODULE_PARM_DESC(ale_ageout, "cpsw ale ageout interval (seconds)");
+
static int rx_packet_max = CPSW_MAX_PACKET_SIZE;
+module_param(rx_packet_max, int, 0);
+MODULE_PARM_DESC(rx_packet_max, "maximum receive packet size (bytes)");
+
static int descs_pool_size = CPSW_CPDMA_DESCS_POOL_SIZE_DEFAULT;
+module_param(descs_pool_size, int, 0444);
+MODULE_PARM_DESC(descs_pool_size, "Number of CPDMA CPPI descriptors in pool");
struct cpsw_devlink {
struct cpsw_common *cpsw;
--
2.39.2
next reply other threads:[~2023-08-14 21:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-08-14 21:13 Graeme Smecher [this message]
2023-08-14 21:45 ` [PATCH] net: ti/cpsw_new: Expose the same module parameters as ti/cpsw Andrew Lunn
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230814211323.3272487-1-gsmecher@threespeedlogic.com \
--to=gsmecher@threespeedlogic.com \
--cc=alardam@gmail.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=grygorii.strashko@ti.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lorenzo@kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=shayagr@amazon.com \
--cc=wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com \
--cc=yangyingliang@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).