From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9E7831FB2; Tue, 23 Jan 2024 04:50:49 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1705985449; cv=none; b=l7r8jA6eXN0/Bb9hKwJh9IM3eFK8HK5RHsS6oTqoKW7k+BAorWfaj4eFahzG1oFoC4+t8BfgB3pme566rmnqnRKCpGbWAdlCOzr7ANQSHOSbDUNeYhsDAyPWBfNwMB9vHGYmclFeQrB5aXxAeiPzicbErwuLcz/YCtfr6bkWnq4= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1705985449; c=relaxed/simple; bh=IdSvEOKbJIYd++hbA82AHUZUcqgNsBgNh82BmM0dfCo=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=dA79FYTr62sV3ZOV0T1gHdCr/rFkrgmPNoYVNpdelcV3Ff7uW59R1wjSahGLtfYviECOC1Ozvz7H5unn4pX5pVHySbs3v1BRc+f4MAi4Mdg9hxBekPUZ+JnG8JrK5umIAsFzZfyTGAOTDQ0Y0ZD2VOOKwzWAnjkR7o9kWFBV6es= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=nRLX+7K4; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="nRLX+7K4" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 060A1C433F1; Tue, 23 Jan 2024 04:50:47 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1705985449; bh=IdSvEOKbJIYd++hbA82AHUZUcqgNsBgNh82BmM0dfCo=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=nRLX+7K4zEfU6/5y/VdkTajG7rUbsaKiVVo08APsiJVIn/P3i7xLnSXPbK4+R12yI 4olHYqoiSxCHitkm9qACSw9qpFOMQA6AlxVJqJ7lEhWTdZBBLI+QFhN/VubICdYk0b uK+zIlTJBthFfFXXXK+/tAN7XF78HsLRnYC3iM5OrovBqe0JyOZns2nmIazk/no9p+ jP8HiFa/ohDcYXK2KRdqLolhZ7t0ZEmmqjaduTrcHEEq+APN0ZdoYsPDrYifSMgDmX fZqmUCrdFtlh5hiNwNHBirmSdPvjXLgx18srvdMaP/qfYtSO/rvpxQanC8T3NzEG+L y5ml+eABrkTNw== Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2024 20:50:46 -0800 From: Jakub Kicinski To: Danielle Ratson Cc: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH net-next 3/9] ethtool: Add an interface for flashing transceiver modules' firmware Message-ID: <20240122205046.5bb0ffe7@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <20240122084530.32451-4-danieller@nvidia.com> References: <20240122084530.32451-1-danieller@nvidia.com> <20240122084530.32451-4-danieller@nvidia.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Mon, 22 Jan 2024 10:45:24 +0200 Danielle Ratson wrote: > +The firmware update process can take several minutes to complete. Therefore, > +during the update process notifications are emitted from the kernel to user > +space updating it about the status and progress. We should state more explicitly that the op just starts the process, and does not block. Looks like cable test already uses _ACT as a suffix, is it based on some standard? Doesn't seem all that intuitive to me (or at least less intuitive than calling it _START...)