From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E1E6B63132; Wed, 24 Jan 2024 12:29:32 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1706099373; cv=none; b=j5ZW+yX0Mk5ZOA92Xo04CD0nik0z2hv1fGvhjUecxcTQsU6uiVlbh3eVgeT2mNfwDXAlbBEOwBlnZEdQ8YhtmmCPrdXi0DNaOVB3jKQ/US2yEsSGgqnXaKaLEixW2Lyy5GKPdXkVb3C+l9uhYW/GwZTcajvgD43YMWwDTyTQzWg= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1706099373; c=relaxed/simple; bh=IzOfGdfJXN3HNbPaRtSQvSMPHR7T4ik2CCl3pxrUFgw=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=T7E8T70kEtXoDtyUNXhbAFRUI7YTXu8DeZlwLrMt9X/M8on80kCo/a22uHix5zSzPVAlqwUWgCvLGRWFE0EV6tan+jyUa53j25qmgJxhPNCaa3hWRaqJ8BvuqkY+bhAYrN5C5koDVUlyEJWGx9Yfz7oHUJVoasa3E23BVctOJpg= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linuxfoundation.org header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.b=n9pDCVXd; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linuxfoundation.org header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.b="n9pDCVXd" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 041A9C433C7; Wed, 24 Jan 2024 12:29:31 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=korg; t=1706099372; bh=IzOfGdfJXN3HNbPaRtSQvSMPHR7T4ik2CCl3pxrUFgw=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=n9pDCVXdgkLKPjjOruZNmL62cpZqpCYGHjAyVcFd9F1IsweGSkHZf+xMNRQ/WhUlp IhLULUDAXn1gmONmW/vrlboDuatOYfM3hU/zaw3vqs6rD8U0/B8tp/P6QRPYl/0D8l XHan51XoSkwy16nlQ3fvFtzmW9bcZ0JDpGrrq/hY= Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2024 04:29:30 -0800 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: Elizabeth Figura Cc: Arnd Bergmann , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-api@vger.kernel.org, wine-devel@winehq.org, =?iso-8859-1?Q?Andr=E9?= Almeida , Wolfram Sang , Arkadiusz Hiler , Peter Zijlstra Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/9] NT synchronization primitive driver Message-ID: <2024012401-garter-empower-14bf@gregkh> References: <20240124004028.16826-1-zfigura@codeweavers.com> <2024012319-aptly-calculate-0f88@gregkh> <12365105.O9o76ZdvQC@camazotz> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <12365105.O9o76ZdvQC@camazotz> On Tue, Jan 23, 2024 at 07:37:01PM -0600, Elizabeth Figura wrote: > On Tuesday, 23 January 2024 18:59:35 CST Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 23, 2024 at 06:40:19PM -0600, Elizabeth Figura wrote: > > > == Patches == > > > > > > This is the first part of a 32-patch series. The series comprises 17 patches > > > which contain the actual implementation, 13 which provide self-tests, 1 to > > > update the MAINTAINERS file, and 1 to add API documentation. > > > > 32 patches? I only see 9 here, why not submit them all? > > Because Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst makes a point of asking people not to submit large patch series (and it matches the expectation of other projects I've worked with—that patches would be submitted and reviewed a few at a time). I suppose I've misunderstood that advice, though. 32 patches isn't all that "large", we can handle that easily :) 100+ patches is large, I guess it all depends, so I can understand the confusion. You need to send us enough for us to be able to understand and review the code, this was a bit short for that. > I'll resend with the entire series. Sorry for the noise. Ptches are NOT noise, we want to see them! thanks, greg k-h