From: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@kernel.org>
Cc: Kuen-Han Tsai <khtsai@google.com>,
quic_prashk@quicinc.com, stern@rowland.harvard.edu,
linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] usb: gadget: u_serial: Add null pointer checks after RX/TX submission
Date: Sat, 27 Jan 2024 17:29:43 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2024012724-chirpy-google-51bb@gregkh> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <02bec7b8-7754-4b9d-84ae-51621d6aa7ec@kernel.org>
On Thu, Jan 18, 2024 at 10:27:54AM +0100, Jiri Slaby wrote:
> On 16. 01. 24, 15:16, Kuen-Han Tsai wrote:
> > Commit ffd603f21423 ("usb: gadget: u_serial: Add null pointer check in
> > gs_start_io") adds null pointer checks to gs_start_io(), but it doesn't
> > fully fix the potential null pointer dereference issue. While
> > gserial_connect() calls gs_start_io() with port_lock held, gs_start_rx()
> > and gs_start_tx() release the lock during endpoint request submission.
> > This creates a window where gs_close() could set port->port_tty to NULL,
> > leading to a dereference when the lock is reacquired.
> >
> > This patch adds a null pointer check for port->port_tty after RX/TX
> > submission, and removes the initial null pointer check in gs_start_io()
> > since the caller must hold port_lock and guarantee non-null values for
> > port_usb and port_tty.
>
> Or you switch to tty_port refcounting and need not fiddling with this at all
> ;).
I agree, Kuen-Han, why not do that instead?
thanks,
greg k-h
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-01-28 1:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-01-16 14:16 [PATCH] usb: gadget: u_serial: Add null pointer checks after RX/TX submission Kuen-Han Tsai
2024-01-18 9:27 ` Jiri Slaby
2024-01-28 1:29 ` Greg KH [this message]
2024-01-28 14:00 ` Kuen-Han Tsai
2024-03-08 11:47 ` Kuen-Han Tsai
2024-03-28 7:54 ` Kuen-Han Tsai
2024-03-28 9:02 ` Jiri Slaby
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2024012724-chirpy-google-51bb@gregkh \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=jirislaby@kernel.org \
--cc=khtsai@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=quic_prashk@quicinc.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).