From: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
To: Byungchul Park <byungchul@sk.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: llvm@lists.linux.dev, oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev,
kernel_team@skhynix.com, torvalds@linux-foundation.org,
damien.lemoal@opensource.wdc.com, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org,
adilger.kernel@dilger.ca, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org,
mingo@redhat.com, peterz@infradead.org, will@kernel.org,
tglx@linutronix.de, rostedt@goodmis.org, joel@joelfernandes.org,
sashal@kernel.org, daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch, duyuyang@gmail.com,
johannes.berg@intel.com, tj@kernel.org, tytso@mit.edu,
willy@infradead.org, david@fromorbit.com, amir73il@gmail.com,
gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, kernel-team@lge.com,
linux-mm@kvack.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, mhocko@kernel.org,
minchan@kernel.org, hannes@cmpxchg.org, vdavydov.dev@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 05/26] dept: Tie to Lockdep and IRQ tracing
Date: Sun, 28 Jan 2024 21:10:06 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <202401282019.lvlmRwlL-lkp@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240124115938.80132-6-byungchul@sk.com>
Hi Byungchul,
kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings:
[auto build test WARNING on 0dd3ee31125508cd67f7e7172247f05b7fd1753a]
url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Byungchul-Park/llist-Move-llist_-head-node-definition-to-types-h/20240124-200243
base: 0dd3ee31125508cd67f7e7172247f05b7fd1753a
patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240124115938.80132-6-byungchul%40sk.com
patch subject: [PATCH v11 05/26] dept: Tie to Lockdep and IRQ tracing
config: hexagon-allyesconfig (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240128/202401282019.lvlmRwlL-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: clang version 18.0.0git (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project a31a60074717fc40887cfe132b77eec93bedd307)
reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240128/202401282019.lvlmRwlL-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)
If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202401282019.lvlmRwlL-lkp@intel.com/
All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):
In file included from fs/ext4/mballoc.c:12:
In file included from fs/ext4/ext4_jbd2.h:16:
In file included from include/linux/jbd2.h:23:
In file included from include/linux/buffer_head.h:12:
In file included from include/linux/blk_types.h:10:
In file included from include/linux/bvec.h:10:
In file included from include/linux/highmem.h:12:
In file included from include/linux/hardirq.h:12:
In file included from ./arch/hexagon/include/generated/asm/hardirq.h:1:
In file included from include/asm-generic/hardirq.h:17:
In file included from include/linux/irq.h:20:
In file included from include/linux/io.h:13:
In file included from arch/hexagon/include/asm/io.h:337:
include/asm-generic/io.h:547:31: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
547 | val = __raw_readb(PCI_IOBASE + addr);
| ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
include/asm-generic/io.h:560:61: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
560 | val = __le16_to_cpu((__le16 __force)__raw_readw(PCI_IOBASE + addr));
| ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
include/uapi/linux/byteorder/little_endian.h:37:51: note: expanded from macro '__le16_to_cpu'
37 | #define __le16_to_cpu(x) ((__force __u16)(__le16)(x))
| ^
In file included from fs/ext4/mballoc.c:12:
In file included from fs/ext4/ext4_jbd2.h:16:
In file included from include/linux/jbd2.h:23:
In file included from include/linux/buffer_head.h:12:
In file included from include/linux/blk_types.h:10:
In file included from include/linux/bvec.h:10:
In file included from include/linux/highmem.h:12:
In file included from include/linux/hardirq.h:12:
In file included from ./arch/hexagon/include/generated/asm/hardirq.h:1:
In file included from include/asm-generic/hardirq.h:17:
In file included from include/linux/irq.h:20:
In file included from include/linux/io.h:13:
In file included from arch/hexagon/include/asm/io.h:337:
include/asm-generic/io.h:573:61: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
573 | val = __le32_to_cpu((__le32 __force)__raw_readl(PCI_IOBASE + addr));
| ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
include/uapi/linux/byteorder/little_endian.h:35:51: note: expanded from macro '__le32_to_cpu'
35 | #define __le32_to_cpu(x) ((__force __u32)(__le32)(x))
| ^
In file included from fs/ext4/mballoc.c:12:
In file included from fs/ext4/ext4_jbd2.h:16:
In file included from include/linux/jbd2.h:23:
In file included from include/linux/buffer_head.h:12:
In file included from include/linux/blk_types.h:10:
In file included from include/linux/bvec.h:10:
In file included from include/linux/highmem.h:12:
In file included from include/linux/hardirq.h:12:
In file included from ./arch/hexagon/include/generated/asm/hardirq.h:1:
In file included from include/asm-generic/hardirq.h:17:
In file included from include/linux/irq.h:20:
In file included from include/linux/io.h:13:
In file included from arch/hexagon/include/asm/io.h:337:
include/asm-generic/io.h:584:33: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
584 | __raw_writeb(value, PCI_IOBASE + addr);
| ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
include/asm-generic/io.h:594:59: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
594 | __raw_writew((u16 __force)cpu_to_le16(value), PCI_IOBASE + addr);
| ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
include/asm-generic/io.h:604:59: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
604 | __raw_writel((u32 __force)cpu_to_le32(value), PCI_IOBASE + addr);
| ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
In file included from fs/ext4/mballoc.c:7000:
>> fs/ext4/mballoc-test.c:246:13: warning: stack frame size (1288) exceeds limit (1024) in 'test_new_blocks_simple' [-Wframe-larger-than]
246 | static void test_new_blocks_simple(struct kunit *test)
| ^
7 warnings generated.
--
>> drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_exec_test.c:150:13: warning: stack frame size (1064) exceeds limit (1024) in 'test_prepare_array' [-Wframe-larger-than]
150 | static void test_prepare_array(struct kunit *test)
| ^
1 warning generated.
--
In file included from drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/vcap/vcap_api.c:9:
In file included from drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/vcap/vcap_api_private.h:11:
In file included from drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/vcap/vcap_api.h:11:
In file included from include/linux/netdevice.h:38:
In file included from include/net/net_namespace.h:43:
In file included from include/linux/skbuff.h:17:
In file included from include/linux/bvec.h:10:
In file included from include/linux/highmem.h:12:
In file included from include/linux/hardirq.h:12:
In file included from ./arch/hexagon/include/generated/asm/hardirq.h:1:
In file included from include/asm-generic/hardirq.h:17:
In file included from include/linux/irq.h:20:
In file included from include/linux/io.h:13:
In file included from arch/hexagon/include/asm/io.h:337:
include/asm-generic/io.h:547:31: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
547 | val = __raw_readb(PCI_IOBASE + addr);
| ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
include/asm-generic/io.h:560:61: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
560 | val = __le16_to_cpu((__le16 __force)__raw_readw(PCI_IOBASE + addr));
| ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
include/uapi/linux/byteorder/little_endian.h:37:51: note: expanded from macro '__le16_to_cpu'
37 | #define __le16_to_cpu(x) ((__force __u16)(__le16)(x))
| ^
In file included from drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/vcap/vcap_api.c:9:
In file included from drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/vcap/vcap_api_private.h:11:
In file included from drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/vcap/vcap_api.h:11:
In file included from include/linux/netdevice.h:38:
In file included from include/net/net_namespace.h:43:
In file included from include/linux/skbuff.h:17:
In file included from include/linux/bvec.h:10:
In file included from include/linux/highmem.h:12:
In file included from include/linux/hardirq.h:12:
In file included from ./arch/hexagon/include/generated/asm/hardirq.h:1:
In file included from include/asm-generic/hardirq.h:17:
In file included from include/linux/irq.h:20:
In file included from include/linux/io.h:13:
In file included from arch/hexagon/include/asm/io.h:337:
include/asm-generic/io.h:573:61: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
573 | val = __le32_to_cpu((__le32 __force)__raw_readl(PCI_IOBASE + addr));
| ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
include/uapi/linux/byteorder/little_endian.h:35:51: note: expanded from macro '__le32_to_cpu'
35 | #define __le32_to_cpu(x) ((__force __u32)(__le32)(x))
| ^
In file included from drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/vcap/vcap_api.c:9:
In file included from drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/vcap/vcap_api_private.h:11:
In file included from drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/vcap/vcap_api.h:11:
In file included from include/linux/netdevice.h:38:
In file included from include/net/net_namespace.h:43:
In file included from include/linux/skbuff.h:17:
In file included from include/linux/bvec.h:10:
In file included from include/linux/highmem.h:12:
In file included from include/linux/hardirq.h:12:
In file included from ./arch/hexagon/include/generated/asm/hardirq.h:1:
In file included from include/asm-generic/hardirq.h:17:
In file included from include/linux/irq.h:20:
In file included from include/linux/io.h:13:
In file included from arch/hexagon/include/asm/io.h:337:
include/asm-generic/io.h:584:33: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
584 | __raw_writeb(value, PCI_IOBASE + addr);
| ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
include/asm-generic/io.h:594:59: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
594 | __raw_writew((u16 __force)cpu_to_le16(value), PCI_IOBASE + addr);
| ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
include/asm-generic/io.h:604:59: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
604 | __raw_writel((u32 __force)cpu_to_le32(value), PCI_IOBASE + addr);
| ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
In file included from drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/vcap/vcap_api.c:3598:
>> drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/vcap/vcap_api_kunit.c:1926:13: warning: stack frame size (1296) exceeds limit (1024) in 'vcap_api_next_lookup_advanced_test' [-Wframe-larger-than]
1926 | static void vcap_api_next_lookup_advanced_test(struct kunit *test)
| ^
7 warnings generated.
Kconfig warnings: (for reference only)
WARNING: unmet direct dependencies detected for FRAME_POINTER
Depends on [n]: DEBUG_KERNEL [=y] && (M68K || UML || SUPERH) || ARCH_WANT_FRAME_POINTERS [=n]
Selected by [y]:
- DEPT [=y] && DEBUG_KERNEL [=y] && LOCK_DEBUGGING_SUPPORT [=y] && !MIPS && !PPC && !ARM && !S390 && !MICROBLAZE && !ARC && !X86
vim +/test_new_blocks_simple +246 fs/ext4/mballoc-test.c
7c9fa399a36954 Kemeng Shi 2023-09-29 245
7c9fa399a36954 Kemeng Shi 2023-09-29 @246 static void test_new_blocks_simple(struct kunit *test)
7c9fa399a36954 Kemeng Shi 2023-09-29 247 {
7c9fa399a36954 Kemeng Shi 2023-09-29 248 struct super_block *sb = (struct super_block *)test->priv;
7c9fa399a36954 Kemeng Shi 2023-09-29 249 struct inode inode = { .i_sb = sb, };
7c9fa399a36954 Kemeng Shi 2023-09-29 250 struct ext4_allocation_request ar;
7c9fa399a36954 Kemeng Shi 2023-09-29 251 ext4_group_t i, goal_group = TEST_GOAL_GROUP;
7c9fa399a36954 Kemeng Shi 2023-09-29 252 int err = 0;
7c9fa399a36954 Kemeng Shi 2023-09-29 253 ext4_fsblk_t found;
7c9fa399a36954 Kemeng Shi 2023-09-29 254 struct ext4_sb_info *sbi = EXT4_SB(sb);
7c9fa399a36954 Kemeng Shi 2023-09-29 255
7c9fa399a36954 Kemeng Shi 2023-09-29 256 ar.inode = &inode;
7c9fa399a36954 Kemeng Shi 2023-09-29 257
7c9fa399a36954 Kemeng Shi 2023-09-29 258 /* get block at goal */
7c9fa399a36954 Kemeng Shi 2023-09-29 259 ar.goal = ext4_group_first_block_no(sb, goal_group);
7c9fa399a36954 Kemeng Shi 2023-09-29 260 found = ext4_mb_new_blocks_simple(&ar, &err);
7c9fa399a36954 Kemeng Shi 2023-09-29 261 KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ_MSG(test, ar.goal, found,
7c9fa399a36954 Kemeng Shi 2023-09-29 262 "failed to alloc block at goal, expected %llu found %llu",
7c9fa399a36954 Kemeng Shi 2023-09-29 263 ar.goal, found);
7c9fa399a36954 Kemeng Shi 2023-09-29 264
7c9fa399a36954 Kemeng Shi 2023-09-29 265 /* get block after goal in goal group */
7c9fa399a36954 Kemeng Shi 2023-09-29 266 ar.goal = ext4_group_first_block_no(sb, goal_group);
7c9fa399a36954 Kemeng Shi 2023-09-29 267 found = ext4_mb_new_blocks_simple(&ar, &err);
7c9fa399a36954 Kemeng Shi 2023-09-29 268 KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ_MSG(test, ar.goal + EXT4_C2B(sbi, 1), found,
7c9fa399a36954 Kemeng Shi 2023-09-29 269 "failed to alloc block after goal in goal group, expected %llu found %llu",
7c9fa399a36954 Kemeng Shi 2023-09-29 270 ar.goal + 1, found);
7c9fa399a36954 Kemeng Shi 2023-09-29 271
7c9fa399a36954 Kemeng Shi 2023-09-29 272 /* get block after goal group */
7c9fa399a36954 Kemeng Shi 2023-09-29 273 mbt_ctx_mark_used(sb, goal_group, 0, EXT4_CLUSTERS_PER_GROUP(sb));
7c9fa399a36954 Kemeng Shi 2023-09-29 274 ar.goal = ext4_group_first_block_no(sb, goal_group);
7c9fa399a36954 Kemeng Shi 2023-09-29 275 found = ext4_mb_new_blocks_simple(&ar, &err);
7c9fa399a36954 Kemeng Shi 2023-09-29 276 KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ_MSG(test,
7c9fa399a36954 Kemeng Shi 2023-09-29 277 ext4_group_first_block_no(sb, goal_group + 1), found,
7c9fa399a36954 Kemeng Shi 2023-09-29 278 "failed to alloc block after goal group, expected %llu found %llu",
7c9fa399a36954 Kemeng Shi 2023-09-29 279 ext4_group_first_block_no(sb, goal_group + 1), found);
7c9fa399a36954 Kemeng Shi 2023-09-29 280
7c9fa399a36954 Kemeng Shi 2023-09-29 281 /* get block before goal group */
7c9fa399a36954 Kemeng Shi 2023-09-29 282 for (i = goal_group; i < ext4_get_groups_count(sb); i++)
7c9fa399a36954 Kemeng Shi 2023-09-29 283 mbt_ctx_mark_used(sb, i, 0, EXT4_CLUSTERS_PER_GROUP(sb));
7c9fa399a36954 Kemeng Shi 2023-09-29 284 ar.goal = ext4_group_first_block_no(sb, goal_group);
7c9fa399a36954 Kemeng Shi 2023-09-29 285 found = ext4_mb_new_blocks_simple(&ar, &err);
7c9fa399a36954 Kemeng Shi 2023-09-29 286 KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ_MSG(test,
7c9fa399a36954 Kemeng Shi 2023-09-29 287 ext4_group_first_block_no(sb, 0) + EXT4_C2B(sbi, 1), found,
7c9fa399a36954 Kemeng Shi 2023-09-29 288 "failed to alloc block before goal group, expected %llu found %llu",
7c9fa399a36954 Kemeng Shi 2023-09-29 289 ext4_group_first_block_no(sb, 0 + EXT4_C2B(sbi, 1)), found);
7c9fa399a36954 Kemeng Shi 2023-09-29 290
7c9fa399a36954 Kemeng Shi 2023-09-29 291 /* no block available, fail to allocate block */
7c9fa399a36954 Kemeng Shi 2023-09-29 292 for (i = 0; i < ext4_get_groups_count(sb); i++)
7c9fa399a36954 Kemeng Shi 2023-09-29 293 mbt_ctx_mark_used(sb, i, 0, EXT4_CLUSTERS_PER_GROUP(sb));
7c9fa399a36954 Kemeng Shi 2023-09-29 294 ar.goal = ext4_group_first_block_no(sb, goal_group);
7c9fa399a36954 Kemeng Shi 2023-09-29 295 found = ext4_mb_new_blocks_simple(&ar, &err);
7c9fa399a36954 Kemeng Shi 2023-09-29 296 KUNIT_ASSERT_NE_MSG(test, err, 0,
7c9fa399a36954 Kemeng Shi 2023-09-29 297 "unexpectedly get block when no block is available");
7c9fa399a36954 Kemeng Shi 2023-09-29 298 }
7c9fa399a36954 Kemeng Shi 2023-09-29 299
--
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-01-28 13:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-01-24 11:59 [PATCH v11 00/26] DEPT(Dependency Tracker) Byungchul Park
2024-01-24 11:59 ` [PATCH v11 01/26] llist: Move llist_{head,node} definition to types.h Byungchul Park
2024-01-24 11:59 ` [PATCH v11 02/26] dept: Implement Dept(Dependency Tracker) Byungchul Park
2024-01-24 11:59 ` [PATCH v11 03/26] dept: Add single event dependency tracker APIs Byungchul Park
2024-01-24 11:59 ` [PATCH v11 04/26] dept: Add lock " Byungchul Park
2024-01-24 11:59 ` [PATCH v11 05/26] dept: Tie to Lockdep and IRQ tracing Byungchul Park
2024-01-28 13:10 ` kernel test robot [this message]
2024-01-28 15:58 ` kernel test robot
2024-01-24 11:59 ` [PATCH v11 06/26] dept: Add proc knobs to show stats and dependency graph Byungchul Park
2024-01-24 11:59 ` [PATCH v11 07/26] dept: Apply sdt_might_sleep_{start,end}() to wait_for_completion()/complete() Byungchul Park
2024-01-24 11:59 ` [PATCH v11 08/26] dept: Apply sdt_might_sleep_{start,end}() to swait Byungchul Park
2024-01-24 11:59 ` [PATCH v11 09/26] dept: Apply sdt_might_sleep_{start,end}() to waitqueue wait Byungchul Park
2024-01-24 11:59 ` [PATCH v11 10/26] dept: Apply sdt_might_sleep_{start,end}() to hashed-waitqueue wait Byungchul Park
2024-01-24 11:59 ` [PATCH v11 11/26] dept: Distinguish each syscall context from another Byungchul Park
2024-01-24 11:59 ` [PATCH v11 12/26] dept: Distinguish each work " Byungchul Park
2024-01-24 11:59 ` [PATCH v11 13/26] dept: Add a mechanism to refill the internal memory pools on running out Byungchul Park
2024-01-24 11:59 ` [PATCH v11 14/26] locking/lockdep, cpu/hotplus: Use a weaker annotation in AP thread Byungchul Park
2024-01-26 17:30 ` Thomas Gleixner
2024-01-29 4:20 ` Byungchul Park
2024-01-30 2:58 ` Byungchul Park
2024-02-12 15:16 ` Thomas Gleixner
2024-02-13 1:18 ` Byungchul Park
2024-01-24 11:59 ` [PATCH v11 15/26] dept: Apply sdt_might_sleep_{start,end}() to dma fence wait Byungchul Park
2024-01-24 11:59 ` [PATCH v11 16/26] dept: Track timeout waits separately with a new Kconfig Byungchul Park
2024-01-24 11:59 ` [PATCH v11 17/26] dept: Apply timeout consideration to wait_for_completion()/complete() Byungchul Park
2024-01-24 11:59 ` [PATCH v11 18/26] dept: Apply timeout consideration to swait Byungchul Park
2024-01-24 11:59 ` [PATCH v11 19/26] dept: Apply timeout consideration to waitqueue wait Byungchul Park
2024-01-24 11:59 ` [PATCH v11 20/26] dept: Apply timeout consideration to hashed-waitqueue wait Byungchul Park
2024-01-24 11:59 ` [PATCH v11 21/26] dept: Apply timeout consideration to dma fence wait Byungchul Park
2024-01-24 11:59 ` [PATCH v11 22/26] dept: Record the latest one out of consecutive waits of the same class Byungchul Park
2024-01-24 11:59 ` [PATCH v11 23/26] dept: Make Dept able to work with an external wgen Byungchul Park
2024-01-24 11:59 ` [PATCH v11 24/26] dept: Track PG_locked with dept Byungchul Park
2024-01-24 11:59 ` [PATCH v11 25/26] dept: Print event context requestor's stacktrace on report Byungchul Park
2024-01-28 14:44 ` kernel test robot
2024-01-24 11:59 ` [PATCH v11 26/26] locking/lockdep, fs/jbd2: Use a weaker annotation in journal handling Byungchul Park
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=202401282019.lvlmRwlL-lkp@intel.com \
--to=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=adilger.kernel@dilger.ca \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=amir73il@gmail.com \
--cc=byungchul@sk.com \
--cc=damien.lemoal@opensource.wdc.com \
--cc=daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=duyuyang@gmail.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=joel@joelfernandes.org \
--cc=johannes.berg@intel.com \
--cc=kernel-team@lge.com \
--cc=kernel_team@skhynix.com \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=llvm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=minchan@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=sashal@kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
--cc=vdavydov.dev@gmail.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).