From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1B12755E6F; Wed, 14 Feb 2024 15:09:10 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1707923351; cv=none; b=IlVJQoq9kXWmf7uZrbGrmEssdmq5DD+VnIKcXFHbhmR3BpzfJwEf+h4PqeVQWoFlvoiNDHhC/3HwGvae7w7TON701Fr9p/QHGJrKQWA5C0DW8SqeUtaVcQtltGhf4LU/vXHJcPvrN1qARoaRwdM1iYzWdxnFcK5vWhFq6gxRoFg= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1707923351; c=relaxed/simple; bh=mizirLimmUEE322weHnkCcj0GE0VAoxA+iLLMUv1o/Q=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=VpikaNuA7IjURZGjBiKWYH3G5yMIqKKYYqNpcd2tFAdFeygnD9X/KIidMIEzzDykc8/muDSDAPIOJiBEZ9Bke3eZcioTayh06JZ2Rp39i+mrzNSmBwIL+nIeOX9sjQTYRVQcd2RtMgrMy9+r7WwsUDcvLlSniKATy4QucDt7jmo= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=cxEaiVIx; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="cxEaiVIx" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E2F27C433C7; Wed, 14 Feb 2024 15:09:09 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1707923350; bh=mizirLimmUEE322weHnkCcj0GE0VAoxA+iLLMUv1o/Q=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=cxEaiVIxo/98rw8dZulsMR6qfja+BcJwnthjlX389X5xIoL+cjn4nkFkjlwI/oVrD 2Pnx49FszyK6E5BmjdEvFxmAC7/q2LIJLit/McOquFQWxgpax9BQpw5QqqAVzwBipW fL33htjlqVcHGZWIf2jBlExk486Ei4unn0LXdh+pC8rvD6jUMtMn3cAjvuoMum2eGk UuN7HlyoW2PtoRujPlvMuOk7dVVFuAZj6Kdw0+5fdOt00LxDS80NsYMfsNePR4G9mP quNWlKt6u4Gbcu3bsp2Li5SCCZRgBm1D4nye0Gt78nYbv9tp7DFF6ZaNot1SoLkabW vrC7Vrw0Ky7jg== Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2024 07:09:08 -0800 From: Jakub Kicinski To: Horatiu Vultur Cc: Florian Fainelli , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net: sparx5: Add spinlock for frame transmission from CPU Message-ID: <20240214070908.37b49ddf@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <20240214081442.w533wvcvqpvq5352@DEN-DL-M31836.microchip.com> References: <20240213121705.4070598-1-horatiu.vultur@microchip.com> <5476743f-3648-4038-97f8-a9df22c0f507@gmail.com> <20240214081442.w533wvcvqpvq5352@DEN-DL-M31836.microchip.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Wed, 14 Feb 2024 09:14:42 +0100 Horatiu Vultur wrote: > > Any reason you targeted 'net-next' rather than 'net', as this appears to > > be clearly a bug fix here? > > Yes, it is a bug but it is not something that happens all the > time and I thought this fits more into the lines of 'This could be a > problem ...' therefore I had targeted 'net-next'. > But if you consider that I should target 'net' instead of 'net-next' I > can do that. Definitely a bug fix worthy of net, yes, please.