On Fri, Feb 23, 2024 at 10:55:59PM +0530, Varshini Rajendran wrote: > Add sam9x7 compatible to DT bindings documentation. > > Signed-off-by: Varshini Rajendran > --- > Changes in v4: > - Fixed the wrong addition of compatible > - Added further compatibles that are possible correct (as per DT) > --- > .../devicetree/bindings/serial/atmel,at91-usart.yaml | 12 +++++++++--- > 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/serial/atmel,at91-usart.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/serial/atmel,at91-usart.yaml > index 65cb2e5c5eee..30af537e8e81 100644 > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/serial/atmel,at91-usart.yaml > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/serial/atmel,at91-usart.yaml > @@ -23,11 +23,17 @@ properties: > - const: atmel,at91sam9260-dbgu > - const: atmel,at91sam9260-usart > - items: > - - const: microchip,sam9x60-usart > + - enum: > + - microchip,sam9x60-usart > + - microchip,sam9x7-usart > - const: atmel,at91sam9260-usart > - items: > - - const: microchip,sam9x60-dbgu > - - const: microchip,sam9x60-usart > + - enum: > + - microchip,sam9x60-dbgu > + - microchip,sam9x7-dbgu > + - enum: > + - microchip,sam9x60-usart > + - microchip,sam9x7-usart This doesn't make sense - this enum should be a const. I don't really understand the idea behind of the original binding here that allowed: "microchip,sam9x60-dbgu", "microchip,sam9x60-usart", "atmel,at91sam9260-dbgu", "atmel,at91sam9260-usart" Specifically, I don't get the purpose of the "microchip,sam9x60-usart". Either make it - items: - enum: - microchip,sam9x60-dbgu - microchip,sam9x7-dbgu - const: microchip,sam9x60-usart - const: atmel,at91sam9260-dbgu - const: atmel,at91sam9260-usart or add - items: - const: microchip,sam9x60-dbgu - const: atmel,at91sam9260-dbgu - const: atmel,at91sam9260-usart or explain exactly why this needs to be "chipa-dgbu", "chipa-usart", "chipb-dbgu", "chipb-dbgu" Thanks, Conor.