From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from gandalf.ozlabs.org (gandalf.ozlabs.org [150.107.74.76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DD54B52F8A; Fri, 1 Mar 2024 20:46:49 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=150.107.74.76 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1709326014; cv=none; b=FUZOdtavUE00dF/dOHnyhOnf5twl+u3S5Pt8YiS3dffy//f0GVkyhySg33Eoauy/UBJC2Zsp4OWQFZsfV9gvoI5Po2C+jC/IIugANlH5JaZlxjqV/dOX/oWKclOrnqZdwcHvPu+wo6ATrYlrKsHpOxvIHnUqGNpu+uuj6FeFGrw= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1709326014; c=relaxed/simple; bh=x0RbpRm8b6yICNf5396SrcPKSh9GJl9QSXvuighwp7E=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=RotjPjY5iq1sZxv+RFe2ZI6mL4JPkhleNag20/zsPBvE9LxXHeCtzIDzEw3xXqMSQG3ZaPjAe0Pvx8R8vHkYIwR4h6kNt4haSuXPOO2lv0evoyHZ3cJrPlhGNekuejyOrIdqP0v4fK9MHLESUAAY2Z6OAUhQPHsk99Lmu2OtB8g= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=canb.auug.org.au; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=canb.auug.org.au; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=canb.auug.org.au header.i=@canb.auug.org.au header.b=rqDE+W0y; arc=none smtp.client-ip=150.107.74.76 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=canb.auug.org.au Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=canb.auug.org.au Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=canb.auug.org.au header.i=@canb.auug.org.au header.b="rqDE+W0y" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=canb.auug.org.au; s=201702; t=1709326007; bh=oYSwxPgbH9v7ByGcfeqI5W61AWHOgbsQ3RsGAe8lHX0=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=rqDE+W0yqzv2hRf6tR84f1c15tKHinaREl5sg+P4bDg4xrd1+E1xxKKYMkSB9sWQs A6zVR8jwGTbnCv1akO6QYwhgjuYsLp3K4hx0R65LJeBfwPH3jAMZ/4LcW8LALJbylW LE6dE63RjPTvLgmA2OX23doHrqg89c5Lh8v0oCNFpVIyQhCfV5nS0BVWXmCidNvjRg sSL+6dOtjdnMAwwvX58Rx1Pws+QeS//wCEKzyTF7C+3uQI1X21I+BMmVlj/Zyv1Jkz /upG4H85L4DPsNajPxYuMkvPaa5si/26gGvSv3FNuagOOR1stxbnYp580ZCr2360OT 3PpBt9kupq4QQ== Received: from authenticated.ozlabs.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (prime256v1) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mail.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4Tmg9x68TRz4wc4; Sat, 2 Mar 2024 07:46:45 +1100 (AEDT) Date: Sat, 2 Mar 2024 07:46:43 +1100 From: Stephen Rothwell To: Shuah Khan Cc: David Gow , Brendan Higgins , Daniel Vetter , Intel Graphics , DRI , Christian =?UTF-8?B?S8O2bmln?= , Matthew Auld , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Linux Next Mailing List , Dave Airlie Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the kunit-next tree Message-ID: <20240302074643.6e1086ff@canb.auug.org.au> In-Reply-To: <86d87830-100f-4f29-bb7f-9a612b90866a@linuxfoundation.org> References: <20240229152653.09ecf771@canb.auug.org.au> <20240301214358.7fdecd66@canb.auug.org.au> <86d87830-100f-4f29-bb7f-9a612b90866a@linuxfoundation.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Sig_/hJtFnmksjMZBb0tNYJ8Tqwn"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha256 --Sig_/hJtFnmksjMZBb0tNYJ8Tqwn Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Shuah, On Fri, 1 Mar 2024 09:05:57 -0700 Shuah Khan wr= ote: > > On 3/1/24 03:43, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > Hi all, > >=20 > > On Fri, 1 Mar 2024 15:15:02 +0800 David Gow wrote= : =20 > >> > >> On Thu, 29 Feb 2024 at 23:07, Shuah Khan w= rote: =20 > >>> > >>> I can carry the fix through kselftest kunit if it works > >>> for all. =20 > >> > >> I'm happy for this to go in with the KUnit changes if that's the best > >> way to keep all of the printk formatting fixes together. Unfortunately you can't fix this in the kunit-next tree without pulling in Linus' tree (or the drm-fixes tree) - which seems excessive. =20 > > I am pretty sure that the proper fix has been applied to the > > drm-fixes tree today (in the merge of the drm-misc-fixes tree). > > =20 >=20 > What's the commit id for this fix? I Would like to include the details > in my pull request to Linus. My mistake, I misread the merge commit. It has not been fixed in the drm-misc-fixes tree or the drm-fixes tree (or Linus' tree since the drm-fixes tree has been merged there) :-( The problem in this case is not with the format string types, but with a missing argument i.e. there is another argument required by the format string. It really should be fixed in the drm-misc-fixes tree and sent to Linus post haste. At least the change in the kunit-next tree will stop this happening in the future. --=20 Cheers, Stephen Rothwell --Sig_/hJtFnmksjMZBb0tNYJ8Tqwn Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAEBCAAdFiEENIC96giZ81tWdLgKAVBC80lX0GwFAmXiPrQACgkQAVBC80lX 0GxuJggAoL1GOk0uMpTgsgmCng4cTme2aI6B+7oHb45TTfcoKZxWTXGVhfRdELwU jeg7AOe+qPKPgiSf8NtHTCLxISVCurIjDUr8l0xZpfvgRyt6uleC3WU3Tb8Fre88 luxtLQUGMFAEhVboYUsnNy/TyLQs2/qYdhv7nLcL7bfdd2uC0HEl8ErNpf0yqL2u u2PC+3DYXwjXmgT7pbaSwmz7yY2nHuCZIUE2Bn0iDFQ8ObIAfJjeMG1NFKEF3TBn 7WWY8Z63JvsaIuK7k1uJzEPk1NmspzltnJHvaIMHpIYptrROK6iOqpXWqDmuxJ3+ XQI9vRpFLX3Xhm/lucKpII9/y8R7Lw== =yARD -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/hJtFnmksjMZBb0tNYJ8Tqwn--