linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Shrikanth Hegde <sshegde@linux.ibm.com>,
	Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>,
	Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Subject: [PATCH 01/10] sched/balancing: Switch the 'DEFINE_SPINLOCK(balancing)' spinlock into an 'atomic_t sched_balance_running' flag
Date: Fri,  8 Mar 2024 11:58:52 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240308105901.1096078-2-mingo@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240308105901.1096078-1-mingo@kernel.org>

The 'balancing' spinlock added in:

  08c183f31bdb ("[PATCH] sched: add option to serialize load balancing")

... is taken when the SD_SERIALIZE flag is set in a domain, but in reality it
is a glorified global atomic flag serializing the load-balancing of
those domains.

It doesn't have any explicit locking semantics per se: we just
spin_trylock() it.

Turn it into a ... global atomic flag. This makes it more
clear what is going on here, and reduces overhead and code
size a bit:

  # kernel/sched/fair.o: [x86-64 defconfig]

     text	   data	    bss	    dec	    hex	filename
    60730	   2721	    104	  63555	   f843	fair.o.before
    60718	   2721	    104	  63543	   f837	fair.o.after

Also document the flag a bit.

No change in functionality intended.

Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>
Cc: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Shrikanth Hegde <sshegde@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
---
 kernel/sched/fair.c | 19 ++++++++++++++++---
 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index 6a16129f9a5c..2ef89b36aed1 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -11633,7 +11633,20 @@ static int active_load_balance_cpu_stop(void *data)
 	return 0;
 }
 
-static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(balancing);
+/*
+ * This flag serializes load-balancing passes over large domains
+ * (above the NODE topology level) - only one load-balancing instance
+ * may run at a time, to reduce overhead on very large systems with
+ * lots of CPUs and large NUMA distances.
+ *
+ * - Note that load-balancing passes triggered while another one
+ *   is executing are skipped and not re-tried.
+ *
+ * - Also note that this does not serialize rebalance_domains()
+ *   execution, as non-SD_SERIALIZE domains will still be
+ *   load-balanced in parallel.
+ */
+static atomic_t sched_balance_running = ATOMIC_INIT(0);
 
 /*
  * Scale the max load_balance interval with the number of CPUs in the system.
@@ -11711,7 +11724,7 @@ static void rebalance_domains(struct rq *rq, enum cpu_idle_type idle)
 
 		need_serialize = sd->flags & SD_SERIALIZE;
 		if (need_serialize) {
-			if (!spin_trylock(&balancing))
+			if (atomic_cmpxchg_acquire(&sched_balance_running, 0, 1))
 				goto out;
 		}
 
@@ -11729,7 +11742,7 @@ static void rebalance_domains(struct rq *rq, enum cpu_idle_type idle)
 			interval = get_sd_balance_interval(sd, busy);
 		}
 		if (need_serialize)
-			spin_unlock(&balancing);
+			atomic_set_release(&sched_balance_running, 0);
 out:
 		if (time_after(next_balance, sd->last_balance + interval)) {
 			next_balance = sd->last_balance + interval;
-- 
2.40.1


  reply	other threads:[~2024-03-08 10:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-03-08 10:58 [PATCH -v4 00/10] sched/balancing: Misc updates & cleanups Ingo Molnar
2024-03-08 10:58 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2024-03-12 12:00   ` [tip: sched/core] sched/balancing: Switch the 'DEFINE_SPINLOCK(balancing)' spinlock into an 'atomic_t sched_balance_running' flag tip-bot2 for Ingo Molnar
2024-03-15  9:25   ` [PATCH 01/10] " Shrikanth Hegde
2024-03-08 10:58 ` [PATCH 02/10] sched/balancing: Remove reliance on 'enum cpu_idle_type' ordering when iterating [CPU_MAX_IDLE_TYPES] arrays in show_schedstat() Ingo Molnar
2024-03-08 13:26   ` Vincent Guittot
2024-03-12 12:00   ` [tip: sched/core] " tip-bot2 for Shrikanth Hegde
2024-03-08 10:58 ` [PATCH 03/10] sched/balancing: Change 'enum cpu_idle_type' to have more natural definitions Ingo Molnar
2024-03-12 12:00   ` [tip: sched/core] " tip-bot2 for Ingo Molnar
2024-03-08 10:58 ` [PATCH 04/10] sched/debug: Increase SCHEDSTAT_VERSION to 16 Ingo Molnar
2024-03-08 16:40   ` Shrikanth Hegde
2024-03-12 10:01     ` Ingo Molnar
2024-03-14  5:21       ` Gautham R. Shenoy
2024-03-14  6:04         ` Swapnil Sapkal
2024-03-15  4:37           ` Shrikanth Hegde
2024-03-15  9:06             ` Swapnil Sapkal
2024-03-15  9:20               ` Shrikanth Hegde
2024-03-15 14:03                 ` Swapnil Sapkal
2024-03-12 12:00   ` [tip: sched/core] " tip-bot2 for Ingo Molnar
2024-03-08 10:58 ` [PATCH 05/10] sched/debug: Allow CONFIG_SCHEDSTATS even on !KERNEL_DEBUG kernels Ingo Molnar
2024-03-12 12:00   ` [tip: sched/core] " tip-bot2 for Ingo Molnar
2024-03-08 10:58 ` [PATCH 06/10] sched/balancing: Change comment formatting to not overlap Git conflict marker lines Ingo Molnar
2024-03-12 12:00   ` [tip: sched/core] " tip-bot2 for Ingo Molnar
2024-03-08 10:58 ` [PATCH 07/10] sched/balancing: Fix comments (trying to) refer to NOHZ_BALANCE_KICK Ingo Molnar
2024-03-08 12:03   ` Vincent Guittot
2024-03-12 12:00   ` [tip: sched/core] " tip-bot2 for Ingo Molnar
2024-03-08 10:58 ` [PATCH 08/10] sched/balancing: Update run_rebalance_domains() comments Ingo Molnar
2024-03-08 12:02   ` Vincent Guittot
2024-03-12 12:00   ` [tip: sched/core] " tip-bot2 for Ingo Molnar
2024-03-08 10:59 ` [PATCH 09/10] sched/balancing: Vertically align the comments of 'struct sg_lb_stats' and 'struct sd_lb_stats' Ingo Molnar
2024-03-08 12:01   ` Vincent Guittot
2024-03-12 12:00   ` [tip: sched/core] " tip-bot2 for Ingo Molnar
2024-03-08 10:59 ` [PATCH 10/10] sched/balancing: Update comments in " Ingo Molnar
2024-03-08 12:01   ` Vincent Guittot
2024-03-12 12:00   ` [tip: sched/core] " tip-bot2 for Ingo Molnar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240308105901.1096078-2-mingo@kernel.org \
    --to=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=sshegde@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
    --cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).