Re: linux-next: manual merge of the bpf-next tree with the mm-stable tree

[Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 4758 bytes --]

Hi all,

On Thu, 7 Mar 2024 12:36:19 +1100 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:
> 
> Today's linux-next merge of the bpf-next tree got a conflict in:
> 
>   mm/vmalloc.c
> 
> between commit:
> 
>   8e1d743f2c26 ("mm: vmalloc: support multiple nodes in vmallocinfo")
> 
> from the mm-stable tree and commit:
> 
>   e6f798225a31 ("mm: Introduce VM_SPARSE kind and vm_area_[un]map_pages().")
> 
> from the bpf-next tree.
> 
> I fixed it up (I think - see below) and can carry the fix as necessary.
> This is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> complex conflicts.
> 
> 
> diff --cc mm/vmalloc.c
> index 25a8df497255,e5b8c70950bc..000000000000
> --- a/mm/vmalloc.c
> +++ b/mm/vmalloc.c
> @@@ -4755,81 -4423,70 +4820,84 @@@ static void show_numa_info(struct seq_f
>   
>   static void show_purge_info(struct seq_file *m)
>   {
>  +	struct vmap_node *vn;
>   	struct vmap_area *va;
>  +	int i;
>   
>  -	spin_lock(&purge_vmap_area_lock);
>  -	list_for_each_entry(va, &purge_vmap_area_list, list) {
>  -		seq_printf(m, "0x%pK-0x%pK %7ld unpurged vm_area\n",
>  -			(void *)va->va_start, (void *)va->va_end,
>  -			va->va_end - va->va_start);
>  -	}
>  -	spin_unlock(&purge_vmap_area_lock);
>  -}
>  +	for (i = 0; i < nr_vmap_nodes; i++) {
>  +		vn = &vmap_nodes[i];
>   
>  -static int s_show(struct seq_file *m, void *p)
>  -{
>  -	struct vmap_area *va;
>  -	struct vm_struct *v;
>  -
>  -	va = list_entry(p, struct vmap_area, list);
>  -
>  -	if (!va->vm) {
>  -		if (va->flags & VMAP_RAM)
>  -			seq_printf(m, "0x%pK-0x%pK %7ld vm_map_ram\n",
>  +		spin_lock(&vn->lazy.lock);
>  +		list_for_each_entry(va, &vn->lazy.head, list) {
>  +			seq_printf(m, "0x%pK-0x%pK %7ld unpurged vm_area\n",
>   				(void *)va->va_start, (void *)va->va_end,
>   				va->va_end - va->va_start);
>  -
>  -		goto final;
>  +		}
>  +		spin_unlock(&vn->lazy.lock);
>   	}
>  +}
>   
>  -	v = va->vm;
>  +static int vmalloc_info_show(struct seq_file *m, void *p)
>  +{
>  +	struct vmap_node *vn;
>  +	struct vmap_area *va;
>  +	struct vm_struct *v;
>  +	int i;
>   
>  -	seq_printf(m, "0x%pK-0x%pK %7ld",
>  -		v->addr, v->addr + v->size, v->size);
>  +	for (i = 0; i < nr_vmap_nodes; i++) {
>  +		vn = &vmap_nodes[i];
>   
>  -	if (v->caller)
>  -		seq_printf(m, " %pS", v->caller);
>  +		spin_lock(&vn->busy.lock);
>  +		list_for_each_entry(va, &vn->busy.head, list) {
>  +			if (!va->vm) {
>  +				if (va->flags & VMAP_RAM)
>  +					seq_printf(m, "0x%pK-0x%pK %7ld vm_map_ram\n",
>  +						(void *)va->va_start, (void *)va->va_end,
>  +						va->va_end - va->va_start);
>   
>  -	if (v->nr_pages)
>  -		seq_printf(m, " pages=%d", v->nr_pages);
>  +				continue;
>  +			}
>   
>  -	if (v->phys_addr)
>  -		seq_printf(m, " phys=%pa", &v->phys_addr);
>  +			v = va->vm;
>   
>  -	if (v->flags & VM_IOREMAP)
>  -		seq_puts(m, " ioremap");
>  +			seq_printf(m, "0x%pK-0x%pK %7ld",
>  +				v->addr, v->addr + v->size, v->size);
>   
>  -	if (v->flags & VM_SPARSE)
>  -		seq_puts(m, " sparse");
>  +			if (v->caller)
>  +				seq_printf(m, " %pS", v->caller);
>   
>  -	if (v->flags & VM_ALLOC)
>  -		seq_puts(m, " vmalloc");
>  +			if (v->nr_pages)
>  +				seq_printf(m, " pages=%d", v->nr_pages);
>   
>  -	if (v->flags & VM_MAP)
>  -		seq_puts(m, " vmap");
>  +			if (v->phys_addr)
>  +				seq_printf(m, " phys=%pa", &v->phys_addr);
>   
>  -	if (v->flags & VM_USERMAP)
>  -		seq_puts(m, " user");
>  +			if (v->flags & VM_IOREMAP)
>  +				seq_puts(m, " ioremap");
>   
>  -	if (v->flags & VM_DMA_COHERENT)
>  -		seq_puts(m, " dma-coherent");
> ++			if (v->flags & VM_SPARSE)
> ++				seq_puts(m, " sparse");
> + 
>  -	if (is_vmalloc_addr(v->pages))
>  -		seq_puts(m, " vpages");
>  +			if (v->flags & VM_ALLOC)
>  +				seq_puts(m, " vmalloc");
>   
>  -	show_numa_info(m, v);
>  -	seq_putc(m, '\n');
>  +			if (v->flags & VM_MAP)
>  +				seq_puts(m, " vmap");
>  +
>  +			if (v->flags & VM_USERMAP)
>  +				seq_puts(m, " user");
>  +
>  +			if (v->flags & VM_DMA_COHERENT)
>  +				seq_puts(m, " dma-coherent");
>  +
>  +			if (is_vmalloc_addr(v->pages))
>  +				seq_puts(m, " vpages");
>  +
>  +			show_numa_info(m, v);
>  +			seq_putc(m, '\n');
>  +		}
>  +		spin_unlock(&vn->busy.lock);
>  +	}
>   
>   	/*
>   	 * As a final step, dump "unpurged" areas.

This is now a conflict between the net-next tree and the mm-stable tree.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]