From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [192.198.163.10]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E91E954BE2; Fri, 15 Mar 2024 21:36:39 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.10 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1710538603; cv=none; b=IDgNNbie9MT8c/bLBHMCfUtFGejxveWc+oy4r6EmF7dCt7hptrZfWYNTGs9tsjD5k1sysWvZSq+LbySf5rCkT24EBUr1ZSsDGFNEespDhDyEYku83B3yBW0yADXThvzdJ9XyOtnhXhDrWILqUQ2GP2tDSPlcjphrUL20uvm3j5Q= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1710538603; c=relaxed/simple; bh=GQXUPfiBlSVvLTjL48ZfSB9ZLxCsBjgjHOWhfwvRGB0=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=snNPthNqezlK+qtr1G0PNoqh6asW/AO0vCTwCb5Wy1EpE3Vc2GCUYt9HJ3naKbrcwB9n37F/1Jmchq7ZbqXkNJ6srp7ytSKlrZXXI5vKspxdr6ZXyQ2fTPFIlODmKvjIyv+LON/E/UwzQb1eRgm0hww/+P0OqMqwBQXphAuyA24= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=R3MG9Abr; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.10 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="R3MG9Abr" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1710538600; x=1742074600; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=GQXUPfiBlSVvLTjL48ZfSB9ZLxCsBjgjHOWhfwvRGB0=; b=R3MG9Abr3JRCvrejMs3SXxt5LXQ/NdsDb6KDv6MAoVa5x5P+3JmKJ8hZ kLRty+C6mIexjt+pJKmSedsBfUmZADJ7hSshZNH+1PUotkZUgpZt+9ZRo 4FQEfhYM7dlMF4sSTSZu5Saq3O/mEouJJBHLreTNKVJGRnEBXLwOy+5ob IU9W7wR3sayBUX2Osy4CpTHeb5zD2jis5aJKYZR3hw599PXOe9mCXzocz u+jCxJxaqkdy6dAEYL5OZMbeI+NzLkxqxSqgu3whTr/g5n6dsDf6K+fjf tzSghrKinbFAwYdNTSvj62vR3AvJqIaZTZ83G5sf6w31wBwxSVTke7kZb Q==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,11014"; a="16828984" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.07,129,1708416000"; d="scan'208";a="16828984" Received: from orviesa003.jf.intel.com ([10.64.159.143]) by fmvoesa104.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 15 Mar 2024 14:36:39 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.07,129,1708416000"; d="scan'208";a="17508714" Received: from ls.sc.intel.com (HELO localhost) ([172.25.112.31]) by ORVIESA003-auth.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 15 Mar 2024 14:36:39 -0700 Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2024 14:36:38 -0700 From: Isaku Yamahata To: Binbin Wu Cc: isaku.yamahata@intel.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, isaku.yamahata@gmail.com, Paolo Bonzini , erdemaktas@google.com, Sean Christopherson , Sagi Shahar , Kai Huang , chen.bo@intel.com, hang.yuan@intel.com, tina.zhang@intel.com, isaku.yamahata@linux.intel.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v19 025/130] KVM: TDX: Make TDX VM type supported Message-ID: <20240315213638.GJ1258280@ls.amr.corp.intel.com> References: <5159c2b6a23560e9d8252c1311dd91d328e58871.1708933498.git.isaku.yamahata@intel.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: On Thu, Mar 14, 2024 at 02:29:07PM +0800, Binbin Wu wrote: > > > On 2/26/2024 4:25 PM, isaku.yamahata@intel.com wrote: > > From: Isaku Yamahata > > > > NOTE: This patch is in position of the patch series for developers to be > > able to test codes during the middle of the patch series although this > > patch series doesn't provide functional features until the all the patches > > of this patch series. When merging this patch series, this patch can be > > moved to the end. > > Maybe at this point of time, you can consider to move this patch to the end? Given I don't have to do step-by-step debug recently, I think it's safe to move it. -- Isaku Yamahata