From: Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@linaro.org>
To: linus.walleij@linaro.org
Cc: adobriyan@gmail.com, bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org,
brgl@bgdev.pl, linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org,
wahrenst@gmx.net, warthog618@gmail.com,
lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, anders.roxell@linaro.org,
Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] gpio: cdev: sanitize the label before requesting the interrupt
Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2024 15:05:34 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240402093534.212283-1-naresh.kamboju@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CACRpkdZf5-QR0aU+jhqpsCbNbD+57TN6Yq_Naq8JoLSWSsM8kw@mail.gmail.com>
[-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --]
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain; charset=yes, Size: 2655 bytes --]
Results from Linaro’s test farm.
Regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386 with libgpiod tests.
libgpiod test regressions noticed on Linux stable-rc 6.8, 6.7 and 6.6
and Linux next and mainline master v6.9-rc2.
Anders bisected and found this first bad commit,
gpio: cdev: sanitize the label before requesting the interrupt
commit b34490879baa847d16fc529c8ea6e6d34f004b38 upstream.
Reported-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@linaro.org>
LKFT is running libgpiod test suite version
v2.0.1-0-gae275c3 (and also tested v2.1)
libgpiod
- _gpiod_edge-event_edge_event_wait_timeout
- _gpiod_edge-event_event_copy
- _gpiod_edge-event_null_buffer
- _gpiod_edge-event_read_both_events
- _gpiod_edge-event_read_both_events_blocking
- _gpiod_edge-event_read_falling_edge_event
- _gpiod_edge-event_read_rising_edge_event
- _gpiod_edge-event_read_rising_edge_event_polled
- _gpiod_edge-event_reading_more_events_than_the_queue_contains_doesnt_block
- _gpiod_edge-event_seqno
- _gpiod_line-info_edge_detection_settings
Test log:
-------
ok 16 /gpiod/edge-event/edge_event_buffer_max_capacity
**
gpiod-test:ERROR:tests-edge-event.c:52:_gpiod_test_func_edge_event_wait_timeout: '_request' should not be NULL
# gpiod-test:ERROR:tests-edge-event.c:52:_gpiod_test_func_edge_event_wait_timeout: '_request' should not be NULL
not ok 17 /gpiod/edge-event/edge_event_wait_timeout
ok 18 /gpiod/edge-event/cannot_request_lines_in_output_mode_with_edge_detection
**
gpiod-test:ERROR:tests-edge-event.c:125:_gpiod_test_func_read_both_events: '_request' should not be NULL
# gpiod-test:ERROR:tests-edge-event.c:125:_gpiod_test_func_read_both_events: '_request' should not be NULL
not ok 19 /gpiod/edge-event/read_both_events
Steps to reproduce:
-----
https://tuxapi.tuxsuite.com/v1/groups/linaro/projects/lkft/tests/2eUlyN8HN4R1u0RyLwN6hx7IV0I/reproducer
Links:
- https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-next-master/build/next-20240402/testrun/23265184/suite/libgpiod/tests/
- https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-mainline-master/build/v6.9-rc2/testrun/23244617/suite/libgpiod/tests/
- https://tuxapi.tuxsuite.com/v1/groups/linaro/projects/lkft/tests/2eUlyN8HN4R1u0RyLwN6hx7IV0I
- https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-6.8.y/build/v6.8.2-400-gbffeaccf18b5/testrun/23252337/suite/libgpiod/tests/
- https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-6.7.y/build/v6.7.11-433-gb15156435f06/testrun/23252698/suite/libgpiod/tests/
- https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-6.6.y/build/v6.6.23-397-g75a2533b74d0/testrun/23254910/suite/libgpiod/tests/
--
Linaro LKFT
https://lkft.linaro.org
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-04-02 9:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-03-25 9:02 [PATCH v3] gpio: cdev: sanitize the label before requesting the interrupt Bartosz Golaszewski
2024-03-25 9:25 ` Kent Gibson
2024-03-28 8:54 ` Linus Walleij
2024-04-02 9:35 ` Naresh Kamboju [this message]
2024-04-02 9:48 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240402093534.212283-1-naresh.kamboju@linaro.org \
--to=naresh.kamboju@linaro.org \
--cc=adobriyan@gmail.com \
--cc=anders.roxell@linaro.org \
--cc=bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org \
--cc=brgl@bgdev.pl \
--cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org \
--cc=lkft@linaro.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=wahrenst@gmx.net \
--cc=warthog618@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).