From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 842867C09F; Wed, 8 May 2024 13:54:38 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1715176478; cv=none; b=dSJCfyC6zrmgej5PqRAenjJwyqDnvp5JCxMbPFBYaFrk5o9oFkEjFP9pCpKGoxuL+tQXwmCF9hgENEc0R0b4jvKQVVBVWHxVhKriNO9sFyMp0sw0c405SLDehltHXp118RkL03DIWQFdoUKFv78uigCfXdXRQILeS9KuJ0Ts6Ls= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1715176478; c=relaxed/simple; bh=BVindEG8kkeqoVqnzxdnmSHNneCwyXWBRBgbxPuLyZE=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=pJw5zzgm6mB915dElQysjWF2b/tFtvOtREHYOaNpw6E8UcdC2LzvpbooaPYjRZLetD7TGaRpKnahSB4fD9OBDMvEKx48ILOAi5Qut59xeOuuUW2GNvLhcWu0d6BjDzwLxRaO0K1Nr/VCSLaTfCA0BqHVEjBTOlS8aFMkuqN4G2g= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=VosKMvN9; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="VosKMvN9" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id ABCD9C113CC; Wed, 8 May 2024 13:54:37 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1715176478; bh=BVindEG8kkeqoVqnzxdnmSHNneCwyXWBRBgbxPuLyZE=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=VosKMvN9G5m8W0xR/dY2Gmlj5VGjqY2IJpa1UAltsiCKSIfnNhSnQlxS4heE1btT9 ECCB9NJ5OGV8kY9EOjGeyQmbAPFrHnGMaf+3en7krFHyItjn1QucO9T3LYAv2npdHa gx8ecsojvu4ZTqgx4JU2MInj469Xy0kQMEcz6Vdy6XGimiLMrtcY+CXzqUDVlkkoi6 gjAGLUW7tcSeMUCd1sI1ijvM3g7p14HQtG1oL/liW9paqkTrkKysH2ReCV6H/HzOAP wPS4Pppx0tf9B6pPz6x6n/NGo991sHLWAzV2Ns+bC5if/EwzAcbmAhC2f/xje7vGg+ BqILBev026bOA== Date: Wed, 8 May 2024 06:54:36 -0700 From: Jakub Kicinski To: Jeffrey Altman , David Howells Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, Marc Dionne , "David S. Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Paolo Abeni , linux-afs@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH net 0/5] rxrpc: Miscellaneous fixes Message-ID: <20240508065436.2f0c07e9@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <955B77FD-C0C2-479E-9D85-D2F62E3DA48C@auristor.com> References: <20240503150749.1001323-1-dhowells@redhat.com> <20240507194447.20bcfb60@kernel.org> <955B77FD-C0C2-479E-9D85-D2F62E3DA48C@auristor.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Wed, 8 May 2024 01:57:43 -0600 Jeffrey Altman wrote: > > Looks like these got marked as Rejected in patchwork. > > I think either because lore is confused and attaches an exchange with > > DaveM from 2022 to them (?) or because I mentioned to DaveM that I'm > > not sure these are fixes. So let me ask - on a scale of 1 to 10, how > > convinced are you that these should go to Linus this week rather than > > being categorized as general improvements and go during the merge > > window (without the Fixes tags)? > > Jakub, > > In my opinion, the first two patches in the series I believe are important to back port to the stable branches. > > Reviewed-by: Jeffrey Altman > Are they regressions? Seems possible from the Fixes tag but unclear from the text of the commit messages. In any case, taking the first two may be a reasonable compromise. Does it sounds good to you, David?