From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BE7328662F; Wed, 8 May 2024 15:07:59 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1715180879; cv=none; b=CL9aiJwIyo+T2VrgcmdhkK3EYP+wpp8rlEZxgqnpNBp5EY2HxdMDBoCSG7tnhmVIa8pQTUvV42UdinayqRviLNeIXBafJhOU8Q9Llqgx4xgRtJVgFYpXLh7unxBcSyYRzzHZxmxtPZy4FrKAHyI6M2WX/d0OMuFTBe73VhkVX08= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1715180879; c=relaxed/simple; bh=GciHj+oZ2fXP+d0t8BBXmVMu4hdURU+8gmHOXySA124=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=YrG4ejC1OcC6XvAfgwTMTwKjH1RBDTDai/oL8CdMkJz4KxWrYRWcKADKge/sMxMjUCKZuqqZqG1CBio7T7aBSXoQr/B1tVkVDh07sSc+KxUnFVmgwuXt7CC5bE/i1AZ09N/F1vtQb5k07A9oEDdJJgRX2hs0OT4fcOrUUN64Jlw= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=c06nezEY; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="c06nezEY" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E00C6C2BD10; Wed, 8 May 2024 15:07:58 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1715180879; bh=GciHj+oZ2fXP+d0t8BBXmVMu4hdURU+8gmHOXySA124=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=c06nezEYl1LdgI3waamrNIV13kQ53qXqYx967MvYOeHk107qc5SkaRxjYeubzP6ie hz+werFguJaxK+lyztT54imHkGIhQ27D/vzyOHxjGr39zwc9G9k4UoimMndoRNkNgk zFDPHho/FwqxAgVDQHFk6N+l1HwmE2RalfF7gwtFIBuSQEAPWSikKTZkqjFcZBlX5I vqM8k2tGwchCeEptTRpVQjIG5nGpj6qms6RZ3kzHZ+bYynoTks4CwZSQC+D4dYwVIP yeOldfvyAMSs6Fhy3tO+XJm44g7N1fzoT2TaY7b87b/eukvuHH0IHf5xCUmUOB6KUu cJI2tBOpR7zAA== Date: Wed, 8 May 2024 08:07:57 -0700 From: Jakub Kicinski To: David Howells Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, Marc Dionne , "David S. Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Paolo Abeni , linux-afs@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH net 0/5] rxrpc: Miscellaneous fixes Message-ID: <20240508080757.5022b867@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <1478421.1715176828@warthog.procyon.org.uk> References: <20240507194447.20bcfb60@kernel.org> <20240503150749.1001323-1-dhowells@redhat.com> <1478421.1715176828@warthog.procyon.org.uk> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Wed, 08 May 2024 15:00:28 +0100 David Howells wrote: > Jakub Kicinski wrote: > > > Looks like these got marked as Rejected in patchwork. > > I think either because lore is confused and attaches an exchange with > > DaveM from 2022 to them (?) or because I mentioned to DaveM that I'm > > not sure these are fixes. So let me ask - on a scale of 1 to 10, how > > convinced are you that these should go to Linus this week rather than > > being categorized as general improvements and go during the merge > > window (without the Fixes tags)? > > Ah, sorry. I marked them rejected as I put myself as cc: not S-o-b on one of > them, but then got distracted and didn't get around to reposting them. And > Jeff mentioned that the use of the MORE-PACKETS flag is not exactly > consistent between various implementations. Ah, mystery solved :) > So if you could take just the first two for the moment? Done!