From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933406AbcI0Joo (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Sep 2016 05:44:44 -0400 Received: from szxga03-in.huawei.com ([119.145.14.66]:9431 "EHLO szxga03-in.huawei.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751469AbcI0Jof (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Sep 2016 05:44:35 -0400 CC: , , , John Stultz , "Amit Pundir" , Guodong Xu , , To: From: Chen Yu Subject: BUG: scheduling while atomic in f_fs when gadget remove driver Message-ID: <205cfce1-d54c-262d-f939-ad9f37b0c52c@huawei.com> Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2016 17:44:18 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="gbk" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [10.142.63.192] X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected X-Mirapoint-Virus-RAPID-Raw: score=unknown(0), refid=str=0001.0A0B0206.57EA3F7F.002E,ss=1,re=0.000,recu=0.000,reip=0.000,cl=1,cld=1,fgs=0, ip=0.0.0.0, so=2013-05-26 15:14:31, dmn=2013-03-21 17:37:32 X-Mirapoint-Loop-Id: e11a3553d3a623591c92e08cc4d92f57 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi All, I'm working on Hikey board based around the HiSilicon Kirin 620, with linaro kernel version 4.8.rc1 and I get below BUG error while extracting USB cable from PC. The funtion using f_fs is adb and usb_gadget_unregister_driver will be called after extracting USB cable from PC. [ 89.456512s][pid:1,cpu1,init]BUG: scheduling while atomic: init/1/0x00000002 [ 89.456573s]Modules linked in: [ 89.456604s]Preemption disabled at:[] composite_disconnect+0x30/0xac [ 89.456665s][pid:1,cpu1,init]TGID: 1 Comm: init [ 89.456695s][pid:1,cpu1,init]Call trace: [ 89.456726s][pid:1,cpu1,init][] dump_backtrace+0x0/0x15c [ 89.456756s][pid:1,cpu1,init][] show_stack+0x20/0x28 [ 89.456756s][pid:1,cpu1,init][] dump_stack+0x84/0xa8 [ 89.456787s][pid:1,cpu1,init][] __schedule_bug+0x88/0xdc [ 89.456817s][pid:1,cpu1,init][] __schedule+0x714/0x854 [ 89.456817s][pid:1,cpu1,init][] schedule+0x48/0xa4 [ 89.456817s][pid:1,cpu1,init][] schedule_preempt_disabled+0x4c/0xf4 [ 89.456848s][pid:1,cpu1,init][] __mutex_lock_slowpath+0xbc/0x1a4 [ 89.456878s][pid:1,cpu1,init][] mutex_lock+0x60/0x64 [ 89.456878s][pid:1,cpu1,init][] ffs_func_eps_disable.isra.17+0x54/0x114 [ 89.456909s][pid:1,cpu1,init][] ffs_func_disable+0x30/0xa0 [ 89.456909s][pid:1,cpu1,init][] reset_config.isra.8+0x44/0x78 [ 89.456939s][pid:1,cpu1,init][] composite_disconnect+0x48/0xac [ 89.456939s][pid:1,cpu1,init][] android_disconnect+0x48/0x54 [ 89.456970s][pid:1,cpu1,init][] usb_gadget_remove_driver+0x58/0xa0 [ 89.456970s][pid:1,cpu1,init][] usb_gadget_unregister_driver+0x78/0xc4 I checked the codes of composite_disconnect and found spin_lock_irqsave called before reset_config in which ffs_func_eps_disable is called. void composite_disconnect(struct usb_gadget *gadget) { struct usb_composite_dev *cdev = get_gadget_data(gadget); unsigned long flags; /* REVISIT: should we have config and device level * disconnect callbacks? */ spin_lock_irqsave(&cdev->lock, flags); if (cdev->config) reset_config(cdev); if (cdev->driver->disconnect) cdev->driver->disconnect(cdev); spin_unlock_irqrestore(&cdev->lock, flags); } static void ffs_func_eps_disable(struct ffs_function *func) { struct ffs_ep *ep = func->eps; struct ffs_epfile *epfile = func->ffs->epfiles; unsigned count = func->ffs->eps_count; unsigned long flags; do { if (epfile) mutex_lock(&epfile->mutex); spin_lock_irqsave(&func->ffs->eps_lock, flags); /* pending requests get nuked */ if (likely(ep->ep)) usb_ep_disable(ep->ep); ++ep; spin_unlock_irqrestore(&func->ffs->eps_lock, flags); if (epfile) { epfile->ep = NULL; kfree(epfile->read_buffer); epfile->read_buffer = NULL; mutex_unlock(&epfile->mutex); ++epfile; } } while (--count); } Should the epfile->read_buffer be cleared another place and the mutex_lock can be removed in ffs_func_eps_disable? Thanks and Regards Chen Yu