linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Liu Xiang" <liuxiang_1999@126.com>
To: "Vignesh Raghavendra" <vigneshr@ti.com>
Cc: "Liu Xiang" <liu.xiang6@zte.com.cn>,
	bbrezillon@kernel.org, richard@nod.at,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, marek.vasut@gmail.com,
	linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, computersforpeace@gmail.com,
	dwmw2@infradead.org
Subject: Re:Re: [PATCH v2] mtd: spi-nor: Return error when nor->addr_width does not match the device size
Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2019 23:20:44 +0800 (CST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <209ad144.9c0a.169ba96e2ad.Coremail.liuxiang_1999@126.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <823dcd3f-8b9f-15c5-a072-06625120766e@ti.com>




Hi, Vignesh






At 2019-03-19 13:22:15, "Vignesh Raghavendra" <vigneshr@ti.com> wrote:
>Hi,
>
>On 13/03/19 7:15 PM, Liu Xiang wrote:
>> In some is25lp256, the DWORD1 of JEDEC Basic Flash Parameter Header
>> is 0xfff920e5. So the DWORD1[18:17] Address Bytes bits are 0b00,
>> means that 3-Byte only addressing. But the device size is larger
>> than 16MB, nor->addr_width must be 4 to access the whole address.
>> An error should be returned when nor->addr_width does not match
>> the device size in spi_nor_parse_bfpt(). Then it can go back to
>> use spi_nor_ids[] for setting the right addr_width.
>> 
>> Suggested-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@bootlin.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Liu Xiang <liu.xiang6@zte.com.cn>
>> ---
>>  drivers/mtd/spi-nor/spi-nor.c | 8 ++++++++
>>  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
>> 
>> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/spi-nor.c b/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/spi-nor.c
>> index 6e13bbd..63933c7 100644
>> --- a/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/spi-nor.c
>> +++ b/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/spi-nor.c
>> @@ -2811,6 +2811,14 @@ static int spi_nor_parse_bfpt(struct spi_nor *nor,
>>  	}
>>  	params->size >>= 3; /* Convert to bytes. */
>>  
>> +	/*
>> +	 * If the device exceeds 16MiB, addr_width must be 4.
>> +	 * addr_width == 3 means the Address Bytes we are
>> +	 * reading from BFPT is wrong.
>> +	 */
>
>JESD216 standard does not mandate flash devices >16MiB to always support
>4 byte addressing opcode. So, its okay for flash vendor to support
>>16MiB flash with 3 byte addressing and Bank/extended address register.
>
>> +	if (params->size > 0x1000000 && nor->addr_width == 3)
>> +		return -EINVAL;
>> +
>
>Assuming only DWORD1[18:17] bits are wrong, then returning from here
>would mean we miss parsing Sector Erase settings, Quad Enable
>Requirements etc from BFPT which is kind of bad.
>I suggest to move the fix to[1], addr_width indicated in flash_info
>struct of the device can take precedence over SFDP.
>
>[1]https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/latest/source/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/spi-nor.c#L4106

Boris has added a fixup function, do you think this is more better:

static int
is25lp256_post_bfpt_fixups(struct spi_nor *nor,
			    const struct sfdp_parameter_header *bfpt_header,
			    const struct sfdp_bfpt *bfpt,
			    struct spi_nor_flash_parameter *params)
{
	/*
	 * IS25LP256 supports 4B opcodes.
	 * Unfortunately, some devices get BFPT_DWORD1_ADDRESS_BYTES_3_ONLY  
	 * from BFPT table for address width. We should fix it.
	 */
	if (bfpt.dwords[BFPT_DWORD(1)] & BFPT_DWORD1_ADDRESS_BYTES_MASK == 
		BFPT_DWORD1_ADDRESS_BYTES_3_ONLY)
		nor->addr_width = 4;

	return 0;
}

static struct spi_nor_fixups is25lp256_fixups = {
	.post_bfpt = is25lp256_post_bfpt_fixups,
};


>
>
>>  	/* Fast Read settings. */
>>  	for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(sfdp_bfpt_reads); i++) {
>>  		const struct sfdp_bfpt_read *rd = &sfdp_bfpt_reads[i];
>> 
>
>-- 
>Regards
>Vignesh

  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-03-26 15:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-03-13 13:45 [PATCH v2] mtd: spi-nor: Return error when nor->addr_width does not match the device size Liu Xiang
2019-03-19  5:22 ` Vignesh Raghavendra
2019-03-26 14:20   ` Liu Xiang
2019-03-26 15:20   ` Liu Xiang [this message]
2019-03-27 16:04     ` Vignesh Raghavendra

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=209ad144.9c0a.169ba96e2ad.Coremail.liuxiang_1999@126.com \
    --to=liuxiang_1999@126.com \
    --cc=bbrezillon@kernel.org \
    --cc=computersforpeace@gmail.com \
    --cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=liu.xiang6@zte.com.cn \
    --cc=marek.vasut@gmail.com \
    --cc=richard@nod.at \
    --cc=vigneshr@ti.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).