From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
To: Yizhuo Zhai <yzhai003@ucr.edu>
Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
linux-spi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Zhiyun Qian <zhiyunq@cs.ucr.edu>, Chengyu Song <csong@cs.ucr.edu>
Subject: Re: Potential NULL pointer deference in spi
Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2019 09:01:10 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <214886b4-ec40-3959-35ff-f9b5a2507300@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CABvMjLTrGprdgFTP-+2XC_p+vE+tVWeYvyuLGkKj1dY7KR+JDg@mail.gmail.com>
On 10/10/19 10:31 PM, Yizhuo Zhai wrote:
> Hi Eric:
>
> My apologies for bothering, we got those report via static analysis
> and haven't got a good method to verify the path to trigger them.
> Therefore I sent those email to you maintainers first since you
> know much better about the details. Sorry again for your time and
> I take your suggestions.
My suggestion is that you need to make deep investigations on your own,
before sending mails to lkml@, reaching thousands of people on the planet.
Static analysis tools having too many false positive are not worth
the time spent by humans.
I knew nothing about drivers/spi/spi.c, but after few minutes reading the code,
it was clear your report was wrong.
Do not ask us to do what you should do yourself.
Thanks.
>
> On Wed, Oct 9, 2019 at 10:48 PM Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On 10/9/19 10:37 PM, Yizhuo Zhai wrote:
>>> Hi All:
>>>
>>> drivers/spi/spi.c:
>>>
>>> The function to_spi_device() could return NULL, but some callers
>>> in this file does not check the return value while directly dereference
>>> it, which seems potentially unsafe.
>>>
>>> Such callers include spidev_release(), spi_dev_check(),
>>> driver_override_store(), etc.
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> Many of your reports are completely bogus.
>>
>> I suggest you spend more time before sending such emails to very large audience
>> and risk being ignored at some point.
>>
>> Thanks.
>
>
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-10-11 16:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-10-10 5:37 Potential NULL pointer deference in spi Yizhuo Zhai
2019-10-10 5:48 ` Eric Dumazet
2019-10-11 5:31 ` Yizhuo Zhai
2019-10-11 16:01 ` Eric Dumazet [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=214886b4-ec40-3959-35ff-f9b5a2507300@gmail.com \
--to=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=csong@cs.ucr.edu \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-spi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=yzhai003@ucr.edu \
--cc=zhiyunq@cs.ucr.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).