From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.8 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1,USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4206C432C0 for ; Thu, 21 Nov 2019 01:32:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1D2F20878 for ; Thu, 21 Nov 2019 01:32:08 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linux.microsoft.com header.i=@linux.microsoft.com header.b="VSgxdqIy" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726568AbfKUBcH (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 Nov 2019 20:32:07 -0500 Received: from linux.microsoft.com ([13.77.154.182]:36142 "EHLO linux.microsoft.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725819AbfKUBcH (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 Nov 2019 20:32:07 -0500 Received: from [10.137.112.108] (unknown [131.107.174.108]) by linux.microsoft.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B20AD20B7185; Wed, 20 Nov 2019 17:32:06 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 linux.microsoft.com B20AD20B7185 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linux.microsoft.com; s=default; t=1574299926; bh=aeBFIDmsoWny0EYr1/a2SoKWD35gPHAfNwnYfOwZy7Y=; h=Subject:To:Cc:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=VSgxdqIy4KDeltAbZ9SUt6xRmyYcz3BkhjsQtC5Ai/DXDZ6w50YFDseA96Olnm/UX dn2GPLUE1DKos9EyIOZANzpP5kpa8t1WPU9wxySlRHqbYfu1tf1oPy5w0AZLP5bLaN x7Wdx4RK8aO2jvomC2xBu0tHWMYb7MVjx5U1zhlg= Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 2/5] IMA: Define an IMA hook to measure keys To: Mimi Zohar , Eric Snowberg Cc: linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, keyrings@vger.kernel.org References: <20191118223818.3353-1-nramas@linux.microsoft.com> <20191118223818.3353-3-nramas@linux.microsoft.com> <98eeec95-cc19-2900-b96e-eadaac1b4a68@linux.microsoft.com> <1574299330.4793.158.camel@linux.ibm.com> From: Lakshmi Ramasubramanian Message-ID: <21c08fdf-43d7-67e0-1cb5-66bdbce1b6ad@linux.microsoft.com> Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2019 17:32:03 -0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.9.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1574299330.4793.158.camel@linux.ibm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 11/20/19 5:22 PM, Mimi Zohar wrote: >> I had the following check in process_buffer_measurement() as part of my >> patch, but removed it since it is being upstreamed separately (by Mimi) >> >> if (!ima_policy_flag) >> return; > > Did you post it as a separate patch?  I can't seem to find it. > > Mimi No - I removed the above change from my patch since you mentioned it's being upstreamed separately. I didn't realize you wanted me to include the above change alone in a separate patch (in my patch set). Sorry - I guess I misunderstood. I can do that when I send an update - I expect to by the end of this week. thanks, -lakshmi