From: Vijay Balakrishna <vijayb@linux.microsoft.com>
To: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>, Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>,
Pavel Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@soleen.com>,
Allen Pais <apais@microsoft.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [v4] mm: khugepaged: avoid overriding min_free_kbytes set by user
Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2020 10:27:16 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <21c4788c-2516-2e47-5885-486c352c2b6e@linux.microsoft.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200917092805.GA29887@dhcp22.suse.cz>
On 9/17/2020 2:28 AM, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Wed 16-09-20 23:39:39, Vijay Balakrishna wrote:
>> set_recommended_min_free_kbytes need to honor min_free_kbytes set by the
>> user. Post start-of-day THP enable or memory hotplug operations can
>> lose user specified min_free_kbytes, in particular when it is higher than
>> calculated recommended value.
>
> I was about to recommend a more detailed explanation when I have
> realized that this patch is not really needed after all. Unless I am
> missing something.
>
> init_per_zone_wmark_min ignores the newly calculated min_free_kbytes if
> it is lower than user_min_free_kbytes. So calculated min_free_kbytes >=
> user_min_free_kbytes.
>
> Except for value clamping when the value is reduced and this likely
> needs fixing. But set_recommended_min_free_kbytes should be fine.
>
IIUC, after start-of-day if a user performs
- THP disable
- modifies min_free_bytes
- THP enable
above sequence currently wouldn't result in calling init_per_zone_wmark_min.
Thanks,
Vijay
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-09-17 18:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-09-17 6:39 [v4] mm: khugepaged: avoid overriding min_free_kbytes set by user Vijay Balakrishna
2020-09-17 9:28 ` Michal Hocko
2020-09-17 9:34 ` Michal Hocko
2020-09-17 17:27 ` Vijay Balakrishna [this message]
2020-09-17 17:52 ` Michal Hocko
2020-09-17 18:16 ` Vijay Balakrishna
2020-09-18 5:56 ` Michal Hocko
2020-09-21 19:07 ` Vijay Balakrishna
2020-09-22 7:07 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2020-09-22 10:07 ` Michal Hocko
2020-09-22 16:10 ` Vijay Balakrishna
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=21c4788c-2516-2e47-5885-486c352c2b6e@linux.microsoft.com \
--to=vijayb@linux.microsoft.com \
--cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=apais@microsoft.com \
--cc=kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=pasha.tatashin@soleen.com \
--cc=songliubraving@fb.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).