From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751178AbeC0Thg convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Mar 2018 15:37:36 -0400 Received: from lithops.sigma-star.at ([195.201.40.130]:39418 "EHLO lithops.sigma-star.at" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750936AbeC0The (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Mar 2018 15:37:34 -0400 From: Richard Weinberger To: Arushi Singhal Cc: dwmw2@infradead.org, Brian Norris , Boris Brezillon , Marek Vasut , Cyrille Pitchen , linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] mtd: Replace typedef with struct Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2018 21:32:19 +0200 Message-ID: <2234121.GJlN6YpY6x@blindfold> In-Reply-To: <20180318175122.GA15004@seema-Inspiron-15-3567> References: <20180318175122.GA15004@seema-Inspiron-15-3567> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Am Sonntag, 18. März 2018, 18:51:23 CEST schrieb Arushi Singhal: > Using typedef for a structure type is not suggested in Linux kernel > coding style guidelines. Hence, occurrence of typedefs has been > removed. > > Signed-off-by: Arushi Singhal > --- > drivers/mtd/ssfdc.c | 6 +++--- > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/mtd/ssfdc.c b/drivers/mtd/ssfdc.c > index 95f0bf9..8bae672 100644 > --- a/drivers/mtd/ssfdc.c > +++ b/drivers/mtd/ssfdc.c > @@ -54,15 +54,15 @@ SumSector 2,000 4,000 8,000 16,000 32,000 64,000 128,000 256,000 > SectorSize 512 512 512 512 512 512 512 512 > **/ > > -typedef struct { > +struct chs_entry { > unsigned long size; > unsigned short cyl; > unsigned char head; > unsigned char sec; > -} chs_entry_t; > +}; > > /* Must be ordered by size */ > -static const chs_entry_t chs_table[] = { > +static const struct chs_entry chs_table[] = { > { MiB( 1), 125, 4, 4 }, > { MiB( 2), 125, 4, 8 }, > { MiB( 4), 250, 4, 8 }, > Didn't we already talk about coding style fixes on existing code? ;-) Thanks, //richard