linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Gary R Hook <ghook@amd.com>
To: Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>, Gary R Hook <gary.hook@amd.com>
Cc: iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] iommu/amd - Optimize PPR log handling
Date: Tue, 29 May 2018 12:28:54 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <223930b9-3df9-813a-6676-68072e4e1bb6@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180529145405.GN18595@8bytes.org>

On 05/29/2018 09:54 AM, Joerg Roedel wrote:
> Hey Gary,
> 
> On Fri, May 18, 2018 at 04:51:56PM -0500, Gary R Hook wrote:
>> Improve the performance of the PPR log polling function (i.e. the
>> task of emptying the log) by minimizing MMIO operations and more
>> efficiently processing groups of log entries. Cache the head
>> pointer, as there's never a reason to read it. Ensure the head
>> pointer register is updated every so often, to inform the IOMMU
>> that space is available in the log.
>>
>> Finally, since a single pass may leave logged events unread, use
>> an outer loop to repeat until head has caught up to tail.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Gary R Hook <gary.hook@amd.com>
> 
> Do you have numbers for the performance improvement? How did you test
> this patch?

No, no numbers. We're still working out how best to test this, and 
suggestions/strategies are welcome.

The change is modeled after the function iommu_poll_events(), which is 
much cleaner. The GA log handling should be changed, as well (there are 
superfluous writes in the loop), but I figured, "one thing at a time". 
This is admittedly a minor optimization, but discussions with Tom 
Lendacky have led us down this path.

Your feedback is appreciated.

Gary

  reply	other threads:[~2018-05-29 17:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-05-18 21:51 [PATCH] iommu/amd - Optimize PPR log handling Gary R Hook
2018-05-29 14:54 ` Joerg Roedel
2018-05-29 17:28   ` Gary R Hook [this message]
2018-05-30  4:52     ` Joerg Roedel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=223930b9-3df9-813a-6676-68072e4e1bb6@amd.com \
    --to=ghook@amd.com \
    --cc=gary.hook@amd.com \
    --cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=joro@8bytes.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).