linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>
To: Doug Smythies <doug.smythies@gmail.com>,
	rafael@kernel.org, len.brown@intel.com
Cc: dsmythies@telus.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-pm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: intel_pstate: Override parameters if HWP forced by BIOS
Date: Wed, 08 Sep 2021 23:33:17 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <223a72d91cfda9b13230e4f8cd6a29f853535277.camel@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210909034802.1708-1-dsmythies@telus.net>

On Wed, 2021-09-08 at 20:48 -0700, Doug Smythies wrote:
> If HWP has been already been enabled by BIOS, it may be
> necessary to override some kernel command line parameters.
> Once it has been enabled it requires a reset to be disabled.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Doug Smythies <dsmythies@telus.net>
> ---
>  drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++------
>  1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c
> b/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c
> index bb4549959b11..073bae5d4498 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c
> @@ -3267,7 +3267,7 @@ static int __init intel_pstate_init(void)
>                  */
>                 if ((!no_hwp && boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_HWP_EPP)) ||
>                     intel_pstate_hwp_is_enabled()) {
> -                       hwp_active++;
> +                       hwp_active = 1;
Why this change?

>                         hwp_mode_bdw = id->driver_data;
>                         intel_pstate.attr = hwp_cpufreq_attrs;
>                         intel_cpufreq.attr = hwp_cpufreq_attrs;
> @@ -3347,17 +3347,27 @@ device_initcall(intel_pstate_init);
>  
>  static int __init intel_pstate_setup(char *str)
>  {
> +       /*
> +        * If BIOS is forcing HWP, then parameter
> +        * overrides might be needed. Only print
> +        * the message once, and regardless of
> +        * any overrides.
> +        */
> +       if(!hwp_active 
This part of code is from early_param, Is it possible that 
hwp_active is not 0?

> && boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_HWP))
> +               if(intel_pstate_hwp_is_enabled()){
> +                       pr_info("HWP enabled by BIOS\n");
> +                       hwp_active = 1;
> +               }
>         if (!str)
>                 return -EINVAL;
>  
> -       if (!strcmp(str, "disable"))
> +       if (!strcmp(str, "disable") && !hwp_active)
>                 no_load = 1; 
> -       else if (!strcmp(str, "active"))
> +       if (!strcmp(str, "active"))
>                 default_driver = &intel_pstate;
> -       else if (!strcmp(str, "passive"))
> +       if (!strcmp(str, "passive"))
>                 default_driver = &intel_cpufreq;

Why "else if" changed to "if" ?


Thanks,
Srinivas

> -
> -       if (!strcmp(str, "no_hwp")) {
> +       if (!strcmp(str, "no_hwp") && !hwp_active) {
>                 pr_info("HWP disabled\n");
>                 no_hwp = 1;
>         }



  reply	other threads:[~2021-09-09  6:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-09-09  3:48 [PATCH] cpufreq: intel_pstate: Override parameters if HWP forced by BIOS Doug Smythies
2021-09-09  6:33 ` Srinivas Pandruvada [this message]
2021-09-09 11:18   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2021-09-09 13:20     ` Doug Smythies
2021-09-09 16:12       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2021-09-09 17:22         ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2021-09-10  3:14           ` Doug Smythies
2021-09-10 11:18             ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2021-09-10 15:34               ` Doug Smythies
2021-09-10 15:45                 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2021-09-09 13:30   ` Doug Smythies
2021-09-09 14:52     ` Srinivas Pandruvada
2021-09-10  4:11       ` Doug Smythies

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=223a72d91cfda9b13230e4f8cd6a29f853535277.camel@linux.intel.com \
    --to=srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=doug.smythies@gmail.com \
    --cc=dsmythies@telus.net \
    --cc=len.brown@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rafael@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).