From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752475AbaKLAzn (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Nov 2014 19:55:43 -0500 Received: from v094114.home.net.pl ([79.96.170.134]:65290 "HELO v094114.home.net.pl" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1751063AbaKLAzm convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Nov 2014 19:55:42 -0500 From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" To: Lv Zheng Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Len Brown , Lv Zheng , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/6] ACPI/EC: Cleanup QR_SC command processing by adding a kernel thread to poll EC events. Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2014 02:16:36 +0100 Message-ID: <2277351.09XTT17U9b@vostro.rjw.lan> User-Agent: KMail/4.11.5 (Linux/3.16.0-rc5+; KDE/4.11.5; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Monday, November 03, 2014 01:16:37 PM Lv Zheng wrote: > There is wait code in the QR_SC command processing, which makes it not > suitable to be put into a work queue item (see bug 82611). And there is > case that the SCI_EVT cannot trigger GPE, though all commands have polling > mode implemented, the event cannot be polled (see bug 77431). > > So if the QR_SC command can be put into a seperate IRQ thread, then the > work queue will not be blocked by the QR_SC command processing and we can > also trigger polling using the thread. Using IRQ thread also allows us to > change the EC GPE handler into the threaded IRQ model when possible. > > This patch thus adds the IRQ polling thread for SCI_EVT polling and removes > QR_SC processing work item. > > The reasons why we do not put a loop in the event poller to poll event > until the returned query value is 0: > Some platforms return non 0 query value even when SCI_EVT=0, if we put a > loop in the poller, our command flush mechanism could never execute to > an end thus the system suspending process could be blocked. One SCI_EVT > triggering one QR_EC is current logic and has been proven to be working > for so long time. > > The reasons why it is not implemented directly using threaded IRQ are: > 1. ACPICA doesn't support threaded IRQ as not all of the OSPMs support > threaded IRQ while GPE handler registerations are done through ACPICA. > 2. The IRQ processing code need to be identical for both the IRQ handler > and the thread callback, while currently, though the command GPE > handling is ready for both IRQ and polling mode, only the event GPE is > is polled in the event polling thread and the command is polled in the > user threads. > So we use a standalone kernel thread, if the above situations are changed > in the future, we can easily convert the code into the threaded IRQ style. > > The old EC_FLAGS_QUERY_PENDING is converted to EC_FLAGS_EVENT_ENABLED in > this patch, so that its naming is consistent with EC_FLAGS_EVENT_PENDING. > The original flag doesn't co-work with SCI_EVT well, this patch refines > its usage by enforcing a event polling wakeup indication as: > EC_FLAGS_EVENT_ENABLED && EC_FLAGS_EVENT_PENDING > So unless the both of the flags are set, the threaded event poller will > not be woken up. > > This patch invokes acpi_ec_submit_request() after having detected SCI_EVT > and invokes acpi_ec_complete_request() before having the QR_EC command > processed. This is useful for implementing GPE storm prevention for > malicous "level triggered" SCI_EVT. But the storm prevention is not > implemented in this patch. > > Since the acpi_ec_submit_request() invoked after detecting the SCI_EVT is > paired with acpi_ec_complete_request() invoked after completing QR_EC > command, acpi_ec_submit_flushable_request() then need to be modified to > allow QR_EC command to be submitted during this period to revert the > increased reference count. This period can be determined by the event > polling indication: > EC_FLAGS_EVENT_ENABLED && EC_FLAGS_EVENT_PENDING > Without enhancing this check in acpi_ec_submit_flushable_request(), QR_EC > command will not be executed to decrease the reference count added after > detecting the SCI_EVT, thus the system suspending will be blocked because > the reference count equals to 2. Such check is common for flushing code. > > Reference: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=82611 > Reference: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=77431 > Signed-off-by: Lv Zheng > Tested-by: Ortwin Glück > --- > drivers/acpi/ec.c | 194 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------- > drivers/acpi/internal.h | 1 + > 2 files changed, 144 insertions(+), 51 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/acpi/ec.c b/drivers/acpi/ec.c > index a76794a..7089081 100644 > --- a/drivers/acpi/ec.c > +++ b/drivers/acpi/ec.c > @@ -44,6 +44,7 @@ > #include > #include > #include > +#include > #include > > #include "internal.h" > @@ -75,7 +76,8 @@ enum ec_command { > * when trying to clear the EC */ > > enum { > - EC_FLAGS_QUERY_PENDING, /* Query is pending */ > + EC_FLAGS_EVENT_ENABLED, /* Event is enabled */ > + EC_FLAGS_EVENT_PENDING, /* Event is pending */ > EC_FLAGS_GPE_STORM, /* GPE storm detected */ > EC_FLAGS_HANDLERS_INSTALLED, /* Handlers for GPE and > * OpReg are installed */ > @@ -124,6 +126,7 @@ struct transaction { > static struct acpi_ec_query_handler * > acpi_ec_get_query_handler(struct acpi_ec_query_handler *handler); > static void acpi_ec_put_query_handler(struct acpi_ec_query_handler *handler); > +static int acpi_ec_sync_query(struct acpi_ec *ec, u8 *data); > > struct acpi_ec *boot_ec, *first_ec; > EXPORT_SYMBOL(first_ec); > @@ -149,6 +152,12 @@ static bool acpi_ec_flushed(struct acpi_ec *ec) > return ec->reference_count == 1; > } > > +static bool acpi_ec_has_pending_event(struct acpi_ec *ec) > +{ > + return test_bit(EC_FLAGS_EVENT_ENABLED, &ec->flags) && > + test_bit(EC_FLAGS_EVENT_PENDING, &ec->flags); > +} > + > /* -------------------------------------------------------------------------- > * GPE Enhancement > * -------------------------------------------------------------------------- */ > @@ -177,20 +186,93 @@ static void acpi_ec_complete_request(struct acpi_ec *ec) > * the flush operation is not in > * progress > * @ec: the EC device > + * @check_event: check whether event is pending > * > * This function must be used before taking a new action that should hold > * the reference count. If this function returns false, then the action > * must be discarded or it will prevent the flush operation from being > * completed. > + * > + * During flushing, QR_EC command need to pass this check when there is a > + * pending event, so that the reference count held for the pending event > + * can be decreased by the completion of the QR_EC command. > */ > -static bool acpi_ec_submit_flushable_request(struct acpi_ec *ec) > +static bool acpi_ec_submit_flushable_request(struct acpi_ec *ec, > + bool check_event) > { > - if (!acpi_ec_started(ec)) > - return false; > + if (!acpi_ec_started(ec)) { > + if (!check_event || !acpi_ec_has_pending_event(ec)) > + return false; > + } > acpi_ec_submit_request(ec); > return true; > } > > +static void acpi_ec_enable_event(struct acpi_ec *ec) > +{ > + unsigned long flags; > + > + spin_lock_irqsave(&ec->lock, flags); > + /* Hold reference for pending event */ > + if (!acpi_ec_submit_flushable_request(ec, false)) { > + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ec->lock, flags); > + return; > + } > + set_bit(EC_FLAGS_EVENT_ENABLED, &ec->flags); > + if (test_bit(EC_FLAGS_EVENT_PENDING, &ec->flags)) { > + pr_debug("***** Event pending *****\n"); > + wake_up_process(ec->thread); > + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ec->lock, flags); > + return; > + } > + acpi_ec_complete_request(ec); > + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ec->lock, flags); > +} > + > +static void __acpi_ec_set_event(struct acpi_ec *ec) > +{ > + /* Hold reference for pending event */ > + if (!acpi_ec_submit_flushable_request(ec, false)) > + return; > + if (!test_and_set_bit(EC_FLAGS_EVENT_PENDING, &ec->flags)) { > + pr_debug("***** Event pending *****\n"); > + if (test_bit(EC_FLAGS_EVENT_ENABLED, &ec->flags)) { > + wake_up_process(ec->thread); > + return; > + } > + } > + acpi_ec_complete_request(ec); > +} > + > +static void __acpi_ec_complete_event(struct acpi_ec *ec) > +{ > + if (test_and_clear_bit(EC_FLAGS_EVENT_PENDING, &ec->flags)) { > + /* Unhold reference for pending event */ > + acpi_ec_complete_request(ec); > + pr_debug("***** Event running *****\n"); > + } > +} > + > +int acpi_ec_wait_for_event(struct acpi_ec *ec) > +{ > + unsigned long flags; > + > + set_current_state(TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE); > + while (!kthread_should_stop()) { > + spin_lock_irqsave(&ec->lock, flags); > + if (acpi_ec_has_pending_event(ec)) { > + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ec->lock, flags); > + __set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING); > + return 0; > + } > + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ec->lock, flags); > + schedule(); > + set_current_state(TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE); > + } > + __set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING); > + return -1; > +} > + > /* -------------------------------------------------------------------------- > * Transaction Management > * -------------------------------------------------------------------------- */ > @@ -298,7 +380,7 @@ static bool advance_transaction(struct acpi_ec *ec) > t->flags |= ACPI_EC_COMMAND_COMPLETE; > wakeup = true; > } > - return wakeup; > + goto out; > } else { > if (EC_FLAGS_QUERY_HANDSHAKE && > !(status & ACPI_EC_FLAG_SCI) && > @@ -312,9 +394,11 @@ static bool advance_transaction(struct acpi_ec *ec) > } else if ((status & ACPI_EC_FLAG_IBF) == 0) { > acpi_ec_write_cmd(ec, t->command); > t->flags |= ACPI_EC_COMMAND_POLL; > + if (t->command == ACPI_EC_COMMAND_QUERY) > + __acpi_ec_complete_event(ec); > } else > goto err; > - return wakeup; > + goto out; > } > err: > /* > @@ -325,6 +409,10 @@ err: > if (in_interrupt() && t) > ++t->irq_count; > } > +out: > + if (status & ACPI_EC_FLAG_SCI && > + (!t || t->flags & ACPI_EC_COMMAND_COMPLETE)) > + __acpi_ec_set_event(ec); > return wakeup; > } > > @@ -335,17 +423,6 @@ static void start_transaction(struct acpi_ec *ec) > (void)advance_transaction(ec); > } > > -static int acpi_ec_sync_query(struct acpi_ec *ec, u8 *data); > - > -static int ec_check_sci_sync(struct acpi_ec *ec, u8 state) > -{ > - if (state & ACPI_EC_FLAG_SCI) { > - if (!test_and_set_bit(EC_FLAGS_QUERY_PENDING, &ec->flags)) > - return acpi_ec_sync_query(ec, NULL); > - } > - return 0; > -} > - > static int ec_poll(struct acpi_ec *ec) > { > unsigned long flags; > @@ -384,12 +461,13 @@ static int acpi_ec_transaction_unlocked(struct acpi_ec *ec, > unsigned long tmp; > int ret = 0; > > + bool is_query = !!(t->command == ACPI_EC_COMMAND_QUERY); > if (EC_FLAGS_MSI) > udelay(ACPI_EC_MSI_UDELAY); > /* start transaction */ > spin_lock_irqsave(&ec->lock, tmp); > /* Enable GPE for command processing (IBF=0/OBF=1) */ > - if (!acpi_ec_submit_flushable_request(ec)) { > + if (!acpi_ec_submit_flushable_request(ec, is_query)) { > ret = -EINVAL; > goto unlock; > } > @@ -398,10 +476,6 @@ static int acpi_ec_transaction_unlocked(struct acpi_ec *ec, > pr_debug("***** Command(%s) started *****\n", > acpi_ec_cmd_string(t->command)); > start_transaction(ec); > - if (ec->curr->command == ACPI_EC_COMMAND_QUERY) { > - clear_bit(EC_FLAGS_QUERY_PENDING, &ec->flags); > - pr_debug("***** Event stopped *****\n"); > - } > spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ec->lock, tmp); > ret = ec_poll(ec); > spin_lock_irqsave(&ec->lock, tmp); > @@ -440,8 +514,6 @@ static int acpi_ec_transaction(struct acpi_ec *ec, struct transaction *t) > > status = acpi_ec_transaction_unlocked(ec, t); > > - /* check if we received SCI during transaction */ > - ec_check_sci_sync(ec, acpi_ec_read_status(ec)); > if (test_bit(EC_FLAGS_GPE_STORM, &ec->flags)) { > msleep(1); > /* It is safe to enable the GPE outside of the transaction. */ > @@ -792,29 +864,6 @@ static int acpi_ec_sync_query(struct acpi_ec *ec, u8 *data) > return 0; > } > > -static void acpi_ec_gpe_query(void *ec_cxt) > -{ > - struct acpi_ec *ec = ec_cxt; > - > - if (!ec) > - return; > - mutex_lock(&ec->mutex); > - acpi_ec_sync_query(ec, NULL); > - mutex_unlock(&ec->mutex); > -} > - > -static int ec_check_sci(struct acpi_ec *ec, u8 state) > -{ > - if (state & ACPI_EC_FLAG_SCI) { > - if (!test_and_set_bit(EC_FLAGS_QUERY_PENDING, &ec->flags)) { > - pr_debug("***** Event started *****\n"); > - return acpi_os_execute(OSL_NOTIFY_HANDLER, > - acpi_ec_gpe_query, ec); > - } > - } > - return 0; > -} > - > static u32 acpi_ec_gpe_handler(acpi_handle gpe_device, > u32 gpe_number, void *data) > { > @@ -825,10 +874,46 @@ static u32 acpi_ec_gpe_handler(acpi_handle gpe_device, > if (advance_transaction(ec)) > wake_up(&ec->wait); > spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ec->lock, flags); > - ec_check_sci(ec, acpi_ec_read_status(ec)); > return ACPI_INTERRUPT_HANDLED | ACPI_REENABLE_GPE; > } > > +static int acpi_ec_event_poller(void *context) > +{ > + struct acpi_ec *ec = context; > + > + while (!acpi_ec_wait_for_event(ec)) { > + pr_debug("***** Event poller started *****\n"); > + mutex_lock(&ec->mutex); > + (void)acpi_ec_sync_query(ec, NULL); > + mutex_unlock(&ec->mutex); > + pr_debug("***** Event poller stopped *****\n"); > + } > + return 0; > +} > + > +static int ec_create_event_poller(struct acpi_ec *ec) > +{ > + struct task_struct *t; > + > + t = kthread_run(acpi_ec_event_poller, ec, "ec/gpe-%lu", ec->gpe); Does it have to be a kernel thread? What about using a workqueue instead? > + if (IS_ERR(t)) { > + pr_err("failed to create event poller %lu\n", ec->gpe); > + return PTR_ERR(t); > + } > + get_task_struct(t); > + ec->thread = t; > + return 0; > +} > + > +static void ec_delete_event_poller(struct acpi_ec *ec) > +{ > + struct task_struct *t = ec->thread; > + > + ec->thread = NULL; > + kthread_stop(t); > + put_task_struct(t); > +} > + > /* -------------------------------------------------------------------------- > * Address Space Management > * -------------------------------------------------------------------------- */ > @@ -884,7 +969,6 @@ static struct acpi_ec *make_acpi_ec(void) > > if (!ec) > return NULL; > - ec->flags = 1 << EC_FLAGS_QUERY_PENDING; > mutex_init(&ec->mutex); > init_waitqueue_head(&ec->wait); > INIT_LIST_HEAD(&ec->list); > @@ -940,15 +1024,21 @@ ec_parse_device(acpi_handle handle, u32 Level, void *context, void **retval) > > static int ec_install_handlers(struct acpi_ec *ec) > { > + int ret; > acpi_status status; > > if (test_bit(EC_FLAGS_HANDLERS_INSTALLED, &ec->flags)) > return 0; > + ret = ec_create_event_poller(ec); > + if (ret) > + return ret; > status = acpi_install_gpe_handler(NULL, ec->gpe, > ACPI_GPE_EDGE_TRIGGERED, > &acpi_ec_gpe_handler, ec); > - if (ACPI_FAILURE(status)) > + if (ACPI_FAILURE(status)) { > + ec_delete_event_poller(ec); > return -ENODEV; > + } > > acpi_ec_start(ec); > status = acpi_install_address_space_handler(ec->handle, > @@ -968,6 +1058,7 @@ static int ec_install_handlers(struct acpi_ec *ec) > acpi_ec_stop(ec); > acpi_remove_gpe_handler(NULL, ec->gpe, > &acpi_ec_gpe_handler); > + ec_delete_event_poller(ec); > return -ENODEV; > } > } > @@ -985,6 +1076,7 @@ static void ec_remove_handlers(struct acpi_ec *ec) > if (ACPI_FAILURE(acpi_remove_gpe_handler(NULL, ec->gpe, > &acpi_ec_gpe_handler))) > pr_err("failed to remove gpe handler\n"); > + ec_delete_event_poller(ec); > clear_bit(EC_FLAGS_HANDLERS_INSTALLED, &ec->flags); > } > > @@ -1032,7 +1124,7 @@ static int acpi_ec_add(struct acpi_device *device) > ret = ec_install_handlers(ec); > > /* EC is fully operational, allow queries */ > - clear_bit(EC_FLAGS_QUERY_PENDING, &ec->flags); > + acpi_ec_enable_event(ec); > > /* Clear stale _Q events if hardware might require that */ > if (EC_FLAGS_CLEAR_ON_RESUME) { > diff --git a/drivers/acpi/internal.h b/drivers/acpi/internal.h > index bbcfe0b..20a569c 100644 > --- a/drivers/acpi/internal.h > +++ b/drivers/acpi/internal.h > @@ -128,6 +128,7 @@ struct acpi_ec { > struct list_head list; > struct transaction *curr; > spinlock_t lock; > + struct task_struct *thread; > }; > > extern struct acpi_ec *first_ec; > -- I speak only for myself. Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.