From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1751515AbaJQW3n (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Fri, 17 Oct 2014 18:29:43 -0400
Received: from v094114.home.net.pl ([79.96.170.134]:54229 "HELO
	v094114.home.net.pl" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with SMTP id S1751158AbaJQW3l (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Fri, 17 Oct 2014 18:29:41 -0400
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
        Grant Likely <grant.likely@linaro.org>,
        Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>,
        ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
        Aaron Lu <aaron.lu@intel.com>, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
        Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
        Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@gmail.com>,
        Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>,
        Bryan Wu <cooloney@gmail.com>, Darren Hart <dvhart@linux.intel.com>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 00/12] Add ACPI _DSD and unified device properties support
Date: Sat, 18 Oct 2014 00:50 +0200
Message-ID: <22806489.J415p1md4u@vostro.rjw.lan>
User-Agent: KMail/4.11.5 (Linux/3.16.0-rc5+; KDE/4.11.5; x86_64; ; )
In-Reply-To: <D04C5E60-527A-4CA9-954D-60A82AF0413A@arndb.de>
References: <2660541.BycO7TFnA2@vostro.rjw.lan> <11223831.j9KAEfSQsY@vostro.rjw.lan> <D04C5E60-527A-4CA9-954D-60A82AF0413A@arndb.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Friday, October 17, 2014 08:04:52 PM Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> 
> On October 17, 2014 2:01:33 PM CEST, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> wrote:
> >Hi Everyone,
> >
> >Hving had a couple of chats with Grant and Arnd during LinuxCon EU/LPC,
> >we
> >now have version 5 taking all feedback into account (hopefully).
> 
> Awesome, that was really fast. I'm currently on my way his me in
> the train, replying from my phone, but it looks good now. I'll have a more
> detailed look next week but I'm definitely happy to see this go in (to next
> and 3.19) now, any details we still find can be fixed on top.
> 
> > In
> >short, if
> >we are passed a struct fwnode_handle pointer, we can get from it to the
> >appropriate device node pointer (either struct acpi_device or struct
> >device_node)
> >using container_of() after we've checked the type.  This is needed for
> >the code
> >that needs to access child nodes of a device in case when they don't
> >have
> >struct device representations (whatever the reason).  This has been
> >suggested
> >by Grant and pretty much everyone involved agrees that it's better that
> >the
> >alternatives presented so far.
> 
> Yes, it's nice enough that I now take back all the objections I had for the
> child accessory API.

Cool, thanks!

I've just refreshed the device-properties branch of the linux-pm.git tree
and it contains the current material now (including a couple of build
fixes reported by the autobuild robot in patches [02/12] and [09/12]).

My plan is to merge this into the linux-next branch when 3.18-rc1 is out.

Rafael