linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu@huawei.com>
To: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
Cc: "linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org"
	<linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Silviu Vlasceanu" <Silviu.Vlasceanu@huawei.com>
Subject: RE: Oops at boot with linux-next kernel with IMA boot options
Date: Fri, 29 May 2020 07:33:34 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <22f1132ebc9d4c2e8fc354efb1845984@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <s5hblm8lyz0.wl-tiwai@suse.de>

> From: Takashi Iwai [mailto:tiwai@suse.de]
> On Thu, 28 May 2020 19:36:55 +0200,
> Roberto Sassu wrote:
> >
> > > From: linux-integrity-owner@vger.kernel.org [mailto:linux-integrity-
> > > owner@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Takashi Iwai
> > > On Thu, 28 May 2020 17:35:16 +0200,
> > > Takashi Iwai wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hi Roberto,
> > > >
> > > > it seems that the recent changes in IMA in linux-next caused a
> > > > regression: namely it triggers an Oops when booting with the options
> > > >   ima_policy=tcb ima_template_fmt='d-ng|n-ng|d|ng'
> > >
> > > And further experiment revealed that passing only
> ima_template_fmt=d
> > > is enough for triggering the bug.  Other formats don't matter.
> > >
> > > (snip)
> > > > It's a KVM instance without any TPM stuff, just passed the options
> > > > above.  I could trigger the same bug on a bare metal, too.
> > > >
> > > > Then I performed bisection and it spotted the commit:
> > > > 6f1a1d103b48b1533a9c804e7a069e2c8e937ce7
> > > >   ima: Switch to ima_hash_algo for boot aggregate
> > > >
> > > > Actually reverting this commit fixed the Oops again.
> > >
> > > So, looking at the fact above (triggered by "d") and this bisection
> > > result, it seems that the issue is specific to ima_eventdigest_init().
> > > The difference from others is that this has a check by
> > > ima_template_hash_algo_allowed(), and currently the check allows only
> > > SHA1 and MD5, while now SHA256 is assigned as default.  So I tested
> > > adding SHA256 there like below, and it seems working.
> > >
> > > Hopefully I'm heading to a right direction...
> >
> > Hi Takashi
> >
> > boot_aggregate is the only entry for which there is no file descriptor.
> > The file descriptor is used to recalculate the digest if it is not SHA1
> > or MD5. For boot_aggregate, we should use instead
> > ima_calc_boot_aggregate(). I will provide a patch.
> >
> > I see that the .file member of event_data in
> > ima_add_boot_aggregate() is not initialized. Can you please try
> > to set .file to NULL?
> 
> Tested and it didn't help.  The field was already zero-initialized via
> C99-style initialization, I believe.

Found the issue.

ima_evendigest_init() returns an error and after that IMA is not
initialized. Unfortunately, ima_must_appraise() does not check
ima_policy_flag, so the kernel crashes when ima_match_policy()
tries to evaluate the policy which is not loaded (ima_rules = NULL).

if you add at the beginning of ima_must_appraise()

if (!ima_policy_flag)
	return 0;

the kernel should not crash.

Roberto

HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES Duesseldorf GmbH, HRB 56063
Managing Director: Li Peng, Li Jian, Shi Yanli

> thanks,
> 
> Takashi
> 
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > Roberto
> >
> > HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES Duesseldorf GmbH, HRB 56063
> > Managing Director: Li Peng, Li Jian, Shi Yanli
> >
> > > thanks,
> > >
> > > Takashi
> > >
> > > --- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_template_lib.c
> > > +++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_template_lib.c
> > > @@ -13,7 +13,8 @@
> > >
> > >  static bool ima_template_hash_algo_allowed(u8 algo)
> > >  {
> > > -	if (algo == HASH_ALGO_SHA1 || algo == HASH_ALGO_MD5)
> > > +	if (algo == HASH_ALGO_SHA1 || algo == HASH_ALGO_SHA256 ||
> > > +	    algo == HASH_ALGO_MD5)
> > >  		return true;
> > >
> > >  	return false;
> >

  reply	other threads:[~2020-05-29  7:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-05-28 15:35 Oops at boot with linux-next kernel with IMA boot options Takashi Iwai
2020-05-28 16:37 ` Takashi Iwai
2020-05-28 17:36   ` Roberto Sassu
2020-05-28 18:02     ` Takashi Iwai
2020-05-29  7:33       ` Roberto Sassu [this message]
2020-05-29  7:45         ` Takashi Iwai
2020-05-31 18:50           ` Mimi Zohar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=22f1132ebc9d4c2e8fc354efb1845984@huawei.com \
    --to=roberto.sassu@huawei.com \
    --cc=Silviu.Vlasceanu@huawei.com \
    --cc=linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tiwai@suse.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).