From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754148Ab0CWDWa (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Mar 2010 23:22:30 -0400 Received: from mail-qy0-f182.google.com ([209.85.221.182]:65032 "EHLO mail-qy0-f182.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753839Ab0CWDW2 convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Mar 2010 23:22:28 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=cXXiCG40Jz9sLEgoW2jpudO40Ql3aHmoCv+8xQrgdNrOdbyuRCuyV1fsN2+HQCnSpi 8g/ldAzE3fHiawKj0MbSv4gsvAcsGfGMl6o70fiweA1wcoAQpl32XikjnIYJlf3bjcsk hznom4K1xRO4SFAq1tytHQb2bKMT9FEU8sjGI= MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <201003222228.28268.rjw@sisk.pl> References: <201003222228.28268.rjw@sisk.pl> Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 11:22:26 +0800 Message-ID: <2375c9f91003222022q17cfc75fx3f8ebcb7d785dc42@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: [Bug #15202] lockdep warning during elevator_switch From: =?UTF-8?Q?Am=C3=A9rico_Wang?= To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Cc: Hugh Dickins , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Kernel Testers List , Maciej Rutecki , Greg KH Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 5:28 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Monday 22 March 2010, Hugh Dickins wrote: >> On Sun, 21 Mar 2010, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: >> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions >> > introduced between 2.6.32 and 2.6.33.  Please verify if it still should >> > be listed and let the tracking team know (either way). >> > >> > Bug-Entry   : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15202 >> > Subject             : lockdep warning during elevator_switch >> > Submitter   : Hugh Dickins >> > Date                : 2010-01-31 23:55 (50 days old) >> > References  : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126498212613051&w=4 >> >> Yes, it is still a regression 2.6.33.1 (though fixed in 2.6.34-rc1: >> my guess is that it will be left as a regression in 2.6.33-stable, >> since it only happens when you have chosen CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING=y). > > The policy is that we close the regression bugs after they've been fixed in the > Linus' tree, so I'm going to close it now. Agreed. > > If you want it to go into -stable, please let Greg know directly. > Right, but the fix for this issue is too large to go -stable, perhaps. Lots of related fixes are needed too because of it. Thanks.