From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.6 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 671FCC31E5B for ; Wed, 19 Jun 2019 01:47:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D53621479 for ; Wed, 19 Jun 2019 01:47:31 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="KC2Hj145" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1730079AbfFSBr3 (ORCPT ); Tue, 18 Jun 2019 21:47:29 -0400 Received: from mail-pf1-f180.google.com ([209.85.210.180]:35343 "EHLO mail-pf1-f180.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726037AbfFSBr3 (ORCPT ); Tue, 18 Jun 2019 21:47:29 -0400 Received: by mail-pf1-f180.google.com with SMTP id d126so8711316pfd.2; Tue, 18 Jun 2019 18:47:28 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:content-language; bh=EGnqtXQBaeWmXw32rGsxtQhchtdss28MxmZhzIOLjjs=; b=KC2Hj1453Y/5FcUyBdbxgA0T+1w8erWs8xcGRcBkMHm+e5I1d062ToRSqaoqM3O7rJ 6UKUrxzCQn0Wmhmtl9XhBv8tkHRech1WmOdVyELOAQ+VMkoaXkUNlAKpxc5jlrOmoMnw E7i7yI7bz3G0S8qmVopWRD4kcIlyAmYJQHPkAyGCFeISYxz9cBhaJcs+jF6mO5MPh9uJ VgZ1z/csYvqZOEdpkfFyF+MKRognwPfsDLPjZSpWZ7Thbmix0Zr+tr4ocfGfY4uz3VtX WS409hDoH91kvpCHd6FAedI9A51EqT++X2dHyDslUcRD0bcorhcOWNbO3YywLFlu2RE9 yS5A== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding :content-language; bh=EGnqtXQBaeWmXw32rGsxtQhchtdss28MxmZhzIOLjjs=; b=i7gjJc2CkPL2GZ30jQVyFWfEYImg2Rmv1cb6Zi+wiTWGfqZhuZXxtf+ds8N4vz5Vwk lkAHste1uHMrSDe7IXeIC0aoiSSTB6lL6XYSpFwpuluV4qoTbcLk1BrQSdJsBUFudctC lYQZuNT3/Kuht+B8pY6Rd0Mz5UUFbj9IMCBXM6lomQK6zLxO1Eh2tCDo1KTSdUYvZYTb Wf8aEeKwcF/sTStdIWwXWn8ya4sWwTQVcW9LMxKBs24fUdcNsonbZ6KUCgUa4LwkHEwZ g1zMrkyAvL/MinPkKzbZZMUQLBTaPahxh0Qem0WT1UF2hY3M8m1CzpJMrjKGvn4xu/6L zjvA== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAV73Hs+ySpBe+UIzkRtPbPxF9U28ug2UpNLilzpqhd8bHmLrEQd 0HweMAbT8RjuJuilvwaKHJK1Gc2t X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzltnkDkU7F6t6pF9JPR+2oitR1ROB2GFi4CLsgtr2LT2HXmOWySY3dpsYe9+NJnJIT1zjkzw== X-Received: by 2002:a63:d24f:: with SMTP id t15mr4859629pgi.301.1560908848117; Tue, 18 Jun 2019 18:47:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?IPv6:2001:df0:0:200c:cdaa:21a1:f5f0:6883? ([2001:df0:0:200c:cdaa:21a1:f5f0:6883]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id ci15sm8494878pjb.12.2019.06.18.18.47.25 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 18 Jun 2019 18:47:27 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/7] scsi: NCR5380: Always re-enable reselection interrupt To: "Martin K. Petersen" Cc: Finn Thain , "James E.J. Bottomley" , linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org References: <61f0c0f6aaf8fa96bf3dade5475615b2cfbc8846.1560043151.git.fthain@telegraphics.com.au> <58081aba-4e77-3c8e-847e-0698cf80e426@gmail.com> <9c61076b-81f7-dc7b-0103-1e2e56072453@gmail.com> From: Michael Schmitz Message-ID: <237c4979-c7ab-22d9-35ca-dda1afab2d11@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2019 13:47:23 +1200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.6.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Language: en-US Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Martin, On 19/06/19 12:47 PM, Martin K. Petersen wrote: > Michael, > >> No matter - patch applied cleanly to what I'm running on my Falcon, >> and works just fine for now (stresstest will take a few hours to >> complete). And that'll thoroughly exercise the reselection code path, >> from what we've seen before. > How did it go? Just fine - repeated with different settings for can_queue and cmd_per_lun, with not a single hitch. No regression at all. Cheers,     Michael >