From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758223AbcH3QyC convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Tue, 30 Aug 2016 12:54:02 -0400 Received: from coyote.holtmann.net ([212.227.132.17]:47105 "EHLO mail.holtmann.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757957AbcH3QyB (ORCPT ); Tue, 30 Aug 2016 12:54:01 -0400 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.3 \(3124\)) Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] Bluetooth: hci_ldisc: make sure we don't loose HCI_UART_TX_WAKEUP events From: Marcel Holtmann In-Reply-To: <1471592327-14133-5-git-send-email-boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com> Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2016 09:53:53 -0700 Cc: "Gustavo F. Padovan" , Johan Hedberg , linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, jason.abele@gmail.com Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Message-Id: <23C61632-54CF-43DD-8F99-B18176DF6C07@holtmann.org> References: <1471592327-14133-1-git-send-email-boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com> <1471592327-14133-5-git-send-email-boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com> To: Boris Brezillon X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3124) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Boris, > The HCI_UART_TX_WAKEUP flag checking is racy and some HCI_UART_TX_WAKEUP > events can be lost. > > Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon > --- > drivers/bluetooth/hci_ldisc.c | 11 +++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/drivers/bluetooth/hci_ldisc.c b/drivers/bluetooth/hci_ldisc.c > index 27f73294edcb..ee7b25f1c6ce 100644 > --- a/drivers/bluetooth/hci_ldisc.c > +++ b/drivers/bluetooth/hci_ldisc.c > @@ -172,6 +172,17 @@ restart: > goto restart; > > clear_bit(HCI_UART_SENDING, &hu->tx_state); > + > + /* > + * One last check to make sure hci_uart_tx_wakeup() did not set > + * HCI_UART_TX_WAKEUP while we where clearing HCI_UART_SENDING. > + * The work might have been scheduled by someone else in the > + * meantime, in this case we return directly. > + */ > + if (test_bit(HCI_UART_TX_WAKEUP, &hu->tx_state) && > + !test_and_set_bit(HCI_UART_SENDING, &hu->tx_state)) > + goto restart; > + I know this is correct, but I would actually make it visually different. if (test_bit(UART_TX_WAKEUP, ..) { /* comment goes here */ if (!test_and_set_bit(UART_SENDING, ..) goto restart; } For me with a proper comment that is a lot easier to read and grok that it is correct. Regards Marcel