From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753372AbcIDHlZ (ORCPT ); Sun, 4 Sep 2016 03:41:25 -0400 Received: from mout.web.de ([212.227.17.11]:64715 "EHLO mout.web.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750922AbcIDHlX (ORCPT ); Sun, 4 Sep 2016 03:41:23 -0400 Subject: Re: sparc: bpf_jit: Rename jump labels in bpf_jit_compile() To: David Miller References: <1365a588-c7c7-717c-1e3d-ceabd71e8479@users.sourceforge.net> <20160903.235916.1892276070318494855.davem@davemloft.net> <20160904.003221.1058212775653805315.davem@davemloft.net> Cc: Daniel Borkmann , sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, Adam Buchbinder , Alexei Starovoitov , Rabin Vincent , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, Julia Lawall , Paolo Bonzini , linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, Jean Delvare From: SF Markus Elfring Message-ID: <24817d27-2e33-2c6d-c439-032e9241d832@users.sourceforge.net> Date: Sun, 4 Sep 2016 09:40:07 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20160904.003221.1058212775653805315.davem@davemloft.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:EHRObILWBUFDDARrLBsROlzlCeK9lGlm/Bdx1sGmRgXfKi/LyB1 xWmjP6tb29qDQJ/qS1TRfSBmJluyd4+P7Y8MjCb+WHELmtmKyffjgNOmBxnUtDR9JeuWHCj YenynZdtAxZHmSJ4K/CZ+Tzrp/D7UBds7TzOYoTSU3BPxvF2Dkd5eH3IOEf2r3/EpTIcbCN JqFJ9s8e6GGfoYoRd3nPg== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:NCAHrp2+ihI=:yKRmITr6p/MWA3GKvcVnJn CeefcoKi98t0J59zTzOcO3RPlv8CzN8amyXuJaKpL0rDswfQxXsuIaZ0aVu1BK3FatpihHPch 7Wof9qvyoA+o9i2cOWcCYi78MFp9V0MbeIDLhQK303GTsIxYWAOVqy1nfrkreTWixS/gm4Qbm S1L2zlSn9OiHG2Bk4GkstMBN5/mTt8gYqww6mPSXQe8mzIXH66SsljYGo+B5KzYIVUW/sjA8Q 0ZqsSLNyrD/ijmOf4GP5LWQ+q8xH3dkb6hm2ILpNyxLE/UOkEsrbtxpt4mRMQ9RwLrwd3RkHu KIn+wV0h0T0xc98zSdgBhEdMcde6oNPwl29VkfO2jcYTKpNGnXHzyFrTg7qvKG7pUwokiyuhk SMaKvAMJm9adyhdWfzKnZa+eTt+pRp7SOxmY2LbGy9nX2um20cTUTKE8eSNVPc7/6xVHfWWmC LN/n01/uCZ5uFsEtIwnVoLss24nhmDzWCTgjzR9AmBTgqYUCa7bsKmemIHR/PYjfl22o5xV1E xIu8l9PV7CaB36auUfmBBU8oJY6/YvgOlMBACPOGZ2vJhvnZ+7aneiqMtAIcznGKT16yLMqrk EYpgLF8FHP//+YlRSv0FZvhzRl0M6e3b7pDtnXGwO9vyCV3BY8qM3YQ4/tbnOzYWCHmUFKuOj hCIjM7+F/2W9BckARg96o/Mi3nGv+vazJ9219OQ6VOjQJ5LjuqAXDERSeWO4t3Iz7cXbJl2Vs HybEUQH/yp71Q3G8UxFZFITRoVyWLiCGlzhL8SPTjkSacDPFTU9pSyAwc1oHotbUKk05ia2VM ue+yoz7 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > It's not because I find improvements "uncomfortable", but rather it's > because your changes are not seen as improvements in the first place. What is your software development opinion for the update step "[1/4] sparc: bpf_jit: Use kmalloc_array() in bpf_jit_compile()" from this small patch series? Regards, Markus