linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
To: Pavel Skripkin <paskripkin@gmail.com>,
	davem@davemloft.net, kuba@kernel.org, linmiaohe@huawei.com,
	Sabyrzhan Tasbolatov <snovitoll@gmail.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	syzbot+80dccaee7c6630fa9dcf@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net/core/skbuff.c: __netdev_alloc_skb fix when len is greater than KMALLOC_MAX_SIZE
Date: Mon, 1 Mar 2021 14:09:02 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <24d966a7-ed2e-eb50-23e9-71ff2e43371f@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210226191106.554553-1-paskripkin@gmail.com>



On 2/26/21 8:11 PM, Pavel Skripkin wrote:
> syzbot found WARNING in __alloc_pages_nodemask()[1] when order >= MAX_ORDER.
> It was caused by __netdev_alloc_skb(), which doesn't check len value after adding NET_SKB_PAD.
> Order will be >= MAX_ORDER and passed to __alloc_pages_nodemask() if size > KMALLOC_MAX_SIZE.
> 
> static void *kmalloc_large_node(size_t size, gfp_t flags, int node)
> {
> 	struct page *page;
> 	void *ptr = NULL;
> 	unsigned int order = get_order(size);
> ...
> 	page = alloc_pages_node(node, flags, order);
> ...
> 
> [1] WARNING in __alloc_pages_nodemask+0x5f8/0x730 mm/page_alloc.c:5014
> Call Trace:
>  __alloc_pages include/linux/gfp.h:511 [inline]
>  __alloc_pages_node include/linux/gfp.h:524 [inline]
>  alloc_pages_node include/linux/gfp.h:538 [inline]
>  kmalloc_large_node+0x60/0x110 mm/slub.c:3999
>  __kmalloc_node_track_caller+0x319/0x3f0 mm/slub.c:4496
>  __kmalloc_reserve net/core/skbuff.c:150 [inline]
>  __alloc_skb+0x4e4/0x5a0 net/core/skbuff.c:210
>  __netdev_alloc_skb+0x70/0x400 net/core/skbuff.c:446
>  netdev_alloc_skb include/linux/skbuff.h:2832 [inline]
>  qrtr_endpoint_post+0x84/0x11b0 net/qrtr/qrtr.c:442
>  qrtr_tun_write_iter+0x11f/0x1a0 net/qrtr/tun.c:98
>  call_write_iter include/linux/fs.h:1901 [inline]
>  new_sync_write+0x426/0x650 fs/read_write.c:518
>  vfs_write+0x791/0xa30 fs/read_write.c:605
>  ksys_write+0x12d/0x250 fs/read_write.c:658
>  do_syscall_64+0x2d/0x70 arch/x86/entry/common.c:46
>  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9
> 
> Reported-by: syzbot+80dccaee7c6630fa9dcf@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
> Signed-off-by: Pavel Skripkin <paskripkin@gmail.com>
> Change-Id: I480a6d6f818a4c0a387db0cd3f230b68a7daeb16
> ---
>  net/core/skbuff.c | 3 +++
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/net/core/skbuff.c b/net/core/skbuff.c
> index 785daff48030..dc28c8f7bf5f 100644
> --- a/net/core/skbuff.c
> +++ b/net/core/skbuff.c
> @@ -443,6 +443,9 @@ struct sk_buff *__netdev_alloc_skb(struct net_device *dev, unsigned int len,
>  	if (len <= SKB_WITH_OVERHEAD(1024) ||
>  	    len > SKB_WITH_OVERHEAD(PAGE_SIZE) ||
>  	    (gfp_mask & (__GFP_DIRECT_RECLAIM | GFP_DMA))) {
> +		if (len > KMALLOC_MAX_SIZE)
> +			return NULL;
> +
>  		skb = __alloc_skb(len, gfp_mask, SKB_ALLOC_RX, NUMA_NO_NODE);
>  		if (!skb)
>  			goto skb_fail;
> 


No, please fix the offender instead.

Offender tentative fix was in 

commit 2a80c15812372e554474b1dba0b1d8e467af295d
Author: Sabyrzhan Tasbolatov <snovitoll@gmail.com>
Date:   Tue Feb 2 15:20:59 2021 +0600

    net/qrtr: restrict user-controlled length in qrtr_tun_write_iter()


qrtr maintainers have to tell us what is the maximum datagram length they need to support.




  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-03-01 13:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-02-26 19:11 [PATCH] net/core/skbuff.c: __netdev_alloc_skb fix when len is greater than KMALLOC_MAX_SIZE Pavel Skripkin
2021-02-27 11:03 ` Alexander Lobakin
2021-02-27 16:35   ` [PATCH v2] net/core/skbuff: fix passing wrong size to __alloc_skb Pavel Skripkin
2021-02-27 16:41   ` Pavel Skripkin
2021-02-27 17:51   ` [PATCH v3] " Pavel Skripkin
2021-02-28 18:14     ` Alexander Lobakin
2021-02-28 18:55       ` Jakub Kicinski
2021-02-28 19:11         ` Alexander Lobakin
2021-02-28 19:28       ` Pavel Skripkin
2021-02-28 20:10         ` Alexander Lobakin
2021-02-28 20:27           ` Pavel Skripkin
2021-02-28 23:06           ` [PATCH v4] net/qrtr: fix __netdev_alloc_skb call Pavel Skripkin
2021-02-28 23:22           ` Pavel Skripkin
2021-02-28 23:53             ` Alexander Lobakin
2021-03-01 21:30             ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
2021-03-01 13:09 ` Eric Dumazet [this message]
2021-03-01 13:40   ` [PATCH] net/core/skbuff.c: __netdev_alloc_skb fix when len is greater than KMALLOC_MAX_SIZE Pavel Skripkin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=24d966a7-ed2e-eb50-23e9-71ff2e43371f@gmail.com \
    --to=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linmiaohe@huawei.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=paskripkin@gmail.com \
    --cc=snovitoll@gmail.com \
    --cc=syzbot+80dccaee7c6630fa9dcf@syzkaller.appspotmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).