From: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
To: Stephen Smalley <sds@tycho.nsa.gov>
Cc: dhowells@redhat.com, Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, linux-usb@vger.kernel.org,
linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: What do LSMs *actually* need for checks on notifications?
Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2019 12:43:06 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <25045.1560339786@warthog.procyon.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <05ddc1e6-78ba-b60e-73b1-ffe86de2f2f8@tycho.nsa.gov>
Stephen Smalley <sds@tycho.nsa.gov> wrote:
> > (6) The security attributes of all the objects between the object in (5)
> > and the object in (4), assuming we work from (5) towards (4) if the
> > two aren't coincident (WATCH_INFO_RECURSIVE).
>
> Does this apply to anything other than mount notifications?
Not at the moment. I'm considering making it such that you can make a watch
on a keyring get automatically propagated to keys that get added to the
keyring (and removed upon unlink) - the idea being that there is no 'single
parent path' concept for a keyring as there is for a directory.
I'm also pondering the idea of making it possible to have superblock watches
automatically propagated to superblocks created by automount points on the
watched superblock.
> And for mount notifications, isn't the notification actually for a change to
> the mount namespace, not a change to any file?
Yes.
> Hence, the real "object" for events that trigger mount notifications is the
> mount namespace, right?
Um... arguably. Would that mean that that would need a label from somewhere?
> The watched path is just a way of identifying a subtree of the mount
> namespace for notifications - it isn't the real object being watched.
I like that argument.
Thanks,
David
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-06-12 11:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-06-07 14:17 [RFC][PATCH 00/13] Mount, FS, Block and Keyrings notifications [ver #4] David Howells
2019-06-07 14:17 ` [PATCH 01/13] security: Override creds in __fput() with last fputter's creds " David Howells
2019-06-07 14:17 ` [PATCH 02/13] uapi: General notification ring definitions " David Howells
2019-06-07 15:12 ` Darrick J. Wong
2019-06-07 15:30 ` David Howells
2019-06-07 15:51 ` David Howells
2019-06-09 4:35 ` Randy Dunlap
2019-06-13 13:34 ` David Howells
2019-06-13 14:49 ` Randy Dunlap
2019-06-07 14:17 ` [PATCH 03/13] security: Add hooks to rule on setting a watch " David Howells
2019-06-07 14:17 ` [PATCH 04/13] security: Add a hook for the point of notification insertion " David Howells
2019-06-07 14:18 ` [PATCH 05/13] General notification queue with user mmap()'able ring buffer " David Howells
2019-06-07 14:18 ` [PATCH 06/13] keys: Add a notification facility " David Howells
2019-06-10 17:11 ` Jonathan Corbet
2019-06-10 17:47 ` David Howells
2019-06-07 14:18 ` [PATCH 07/13] vfs: Add a mount-notification " David Howells
2019-06-07 14:18 ` [PATCH 08/13] vfs: Add superblock notifications " David Howells
2019-06-07 14:18 ` [PATCH 09/13] fsinfo: Export superblock notification counter " David Howells
2019-06-07 14:18 ` [PATCH 10/13] Add a general, global device notification watch list " David Howells
2019-06-07 14:19 ` [PATCH 11/13] block: Add block layer notifications " David Howells
2019-06-07 14:19 ` [PATCH 12/13] usb: Add USB subsystem " David Howells
2019-06-07 14:19 ` [PATCH 13/13] Add sample notification program " David Howells
2019-06-10 15:21 ` [RFC][PATCH 00/13] Mount, FS, Block and Keyrings notifications " Stephen Smalley
2019-06-10 16:33 ` Casey Schaufler
2019-06-10 16:42 ` Andy Lutomirski
2019-06-10 18:01 ` Casey Schaufler
2019-06-10 18:22 ` Andy Lutomirski
2019-06-10 19:33 ` Casey Schaufler
2019-06-10 19:53 ` Andy Lutomirski
2019-06-10 21:25 ` Casey Schaufler
2019-06-11 0:13 ` Andy Lutomirski
2019-06-11 14:32 ` Stephen Smalley
2019-06-12 8:55 ` David Howells
2019-06-10 22:07 ` David Howells
2019-06-11 14:21 ` What do LSMs *actually* need for checks on notifications? David Howells
2019-06-11 15:57 ` Stephen Smalley
2019-06-11 16:22 ` Casey Schaufler
2019-06-12 11:43 ` David Howells [this message]
2019-06-13 18:46 ` Stephen Smalley
2019-06-12 17:41 ` David Howells
2019-06-12 18:14 ` Casey Schaufler
2019-06-12 18:36 ` David Howells
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=25045.1560339786@warthog.procyon.org.uk \
--to=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=casey@schaufler-ca.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=sds@tycho.nsa.gov \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).