From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754054Ab3BCXbt (ORCPT ); Sun, 3 Feb 2013 18:31:49 -0500 Received: from hydra.sisk.pl ([212.160.235.94]:60150 "EHLO hydra.sisk.pl" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753883Ab3BCXbp (ORCPT ); Sun, 3 Feb 2013 18:31:45 -0500 From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" To: Myron Stowe Cc: Bjorn Helgaas , Jiang Liu , Jiang Liu , Yinghai Lu , Kenji Kaneshige , Yijing Wang , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, Greg Kroah-Hartman , ACPI Devel Maling List , Toshi Kani Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v5 4/8] ACPI, PCI: avoid building pci_slot as module Date: Mon, 04 Feb 2013 00:38 +0100 Message-ID: <2520964.6C1RTjdEJr@vostro.rjw.lan> User-Agent: KMail/4.9.5 (Linux/3.8.0-rc6; KDE/4.9.5; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: <1359931635.2426.98.camel@zim.stowe> References: <1358525267-14268-1-git-send-email-jiang.liu@huawei.com> <1359931635.2426.98.camel@zim.stowe> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sunday, February 03, 2013 03:47:15 PM Myron Stowe wrote: > On Mon, 2013-01-28 at 14:09 -0700, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > > On Sun, Jan 20, 2013 at 5:01 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > On Saturday, January 19, 2013 12:07:42 AM Jiang Liu wrote: > > >> As discussed in thread at https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/1946851/, > > >> there's no value in supporting CONFIG_ACPI_PCI_SLOT=m any more. > > >> So change Kconfig and code to only support building pci_slot as > > >> built-in driver. > > >> > > >> Signed-off-by: Jiang Liu > > > > > > Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki > > > > Acked-by: Bjorn Helgaas > > > > I think we should eventually get rid of acpi_pci_register_driver() and > > do this initialization directly from acpi_pci_root_add(). But > > removing the module option here is a good first step. > > Bjorn, Rafael: > > If either of you are interested in that still let me know and I can > re-work any or all of the "PCI/ACPI: Remove "pci_root" sub-driver > support" series - https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/12/7/11 I am. However, I think it's better to wait with the rework until our trees are merged into the mainline, so that you can base the patchset on a common tree. > Note [PATCH 13/15] was effectively the same as below and continued on > with initializing directly from acpi_pci_root_add() in [PATCH 14/15]. > There may have been worthwhile fixes in some of the earlier content such > as [PATCH 11/15] worth re-considering also. Well, as I said. All of the patches in the series making sense after v3.9-rc1 will be interesting to me certainly. Thanks, Rafael > > Rafael, do you want to apply this (and [6/8]) via your tree? If not, > > I can take it. > > > > >> --- > > >> drivers/acpi/Kconfig | 5 +---- > > >> drivers/acpi/internal.h | 5 +++++ > > >> drivers/acpi/pci_slot.c | 13 +------------ > > >> drivers/acpi/scan.c | 1 + > > >> 4 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-) > > >> > > >> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/Kconfig b/drivers/acpi/Kconfig > > >> index 0300bf6..7efd0d0 100644 > > >> --- a/drivers/acpi/Kconfig > > >> +++ b/drivers/acpi/Kconfig > > >> @@ -299,7 +299,7 @@ config ACPI_DEBUG_FUNC_TRACE > > >> is about half of the penalty and is rarely useful. > > >> > > >> config ACPI_PCI_SLOT > > >> - tristate "PCI slot detection driver" > > >> + bool "PCI slot detection driver" > > >> depends on SYSFS > > >> default n > > >> help > > >> @@ -308,9 +308,6 @@ config ACPI_PCI_SLOT > > >> i.e., segment/bus/device/function tuples, with physical slots in > > >> the system. If you are unsure, say N. > > >> > > >> - To compile this driver as a module, choose M here: > > >> - the module will be called pci_slot. > > >> - > > >> config X86_PM_TIMER > > >> bool "Power Management Timer Support" if EXPERT > > >> depends on X86 > > >> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/internal.h b/drivers/acpi/internal.h > > >> index e050254..7374cfc 100644 > > >> --- a/drivers/acpi/internal.h > > >> +++ b/drivers/acpi/internal.h > > >> @@ -67,6 +67,11 @@ struct acpi_ec { > > >> > > >> extern struct acpi_ec *first_ec; > > >> > > >> +#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_PCI_SLOT > > >> +void acpi_pci_slot_init(void); > > >> +#else > > >> +static inline void acpi_pci_slot_init(void) { } > > >> +#endif > > >> int acpi_pci_root_init(void); > > >> int acpi_ec_init(void); > > >> int acpi_ec_ecdt_probe(void); > > >> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/pci_slot.c b/drivers/acpi/pci_slot.c > > >> index d22585f..a7d7e77 100644 > > >> --- a/drivers/acpi/pci_slot.c > > >> +++ b/drivers/acpi/pci_slot.c > > >> @@ -330,19 +330,8 @@ static struct dmi_system_id acpi_pci_slot_dmi_table[] __initdata = { > > >> {} > > >> }; > > >> > > >> -static int __init > > >> -acpi_pci_slot_init(void) > > >> +void __init acpi_pci_slot_init(void) > > >> { > > >> dmi_check_system(acpi_pci_slot_dmi_table); > > >> acpi_pci_register_driver(&acpi_pci_slot_driver); > > >> - return 0; > > >> } > > >> - > > >> -static void __exit > > >> -acpi_pci_slot_exit(void) > > >> -{ > > >> - acpi_pci_unregister_driver(&acpi_pci_slot_driver); > > >> -} > > >> - > > >> -module_init(acpi_pci_slot_init); > > >> -module_exit(acpi_pci_slot_exit); > > >> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/scan.c b/drivers/acpi/scan.c > > >> index f8a0d0f..cb964ac 100644 > > >> --- a/drivers/acpi/scan.c > > >> +++ b/drivers/acpi/scan.c > > >> @@ -1732,6 +1732,7 @@ int __init acpi_scan_init(void) > > >> > > >> acpi_power_init(); > > >> acpi_pci_root_init(); > > >> + acpi_pci_slot_init(); > > >> > > >> /* > > >> * Enumerate devices in the ACPI namespace. > > >> > > > -- > > > I speak only for myself. > > > Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center. > > -- I speak only for myself. Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.