From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751496AbaK2A25 (ORCPT ); Fri, 28 Nov 2014 19:28:57 -0500 Received: from v094114.home.net.pl ([79.96.170.134]:56986 "HELO v094114.home.net.pl" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1751366AbaK2A2z (ORCPT ); Fri, 28 Nov 2014 19:28:55 -0500 From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" To: Ulf Hansson Cc: Alan Stern , Geert Uytterhoeven , Linux PM list , Linux PCI , Linux Kernel Mailing List , ACPI Devel Maling List , Bjorn Helgaas , Kevin Hilman Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] PM: Use CONFIG_PM instead of CONFIG_PM_RUNTIME in core code Date: Sat, 29 Nov 2014 01:50:12 +0100 Message-ID: <2549404.ZIjrAGNJPJ@vostro.rjw.lan> User-Agent: KMail/4.11.5 (Linux/3.16.0-rc5+; KDE/4.11.5; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: References: <1803282.Wzz7IausxS@vostro.rjw.lan> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thursday, November 27, 2014 11:34:03 PM Ulf Hansson wrote: > [...] > > > That said whether or not it is ever useful to set PM_RUNTIME alone is a good > > question. In my opinion it is useful today, at least on some platforms that > > don't really support system suspend or hibernation in any form. However, it > > may not be the case any more when suspend-to-idle becomes mature enough, > > because that should just work for any platform without any kind of special > > support. We're still missing some timekeeping bits there, but once that > > gap has been covered, we may just eliminate PM_SLEEP as well if there's a > > broad consensus on that. > > That's sounds like a good approach, thanks for sharing your ideas and plans. > > Feel free to add my reviewed-by tag to this patchset as well. I'll do that, thanks!