From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753252AbaJGAAh (ORCPT ); Mon, 6 Oct 2014 20:00:37 -0400 Received: from v094114.home.net.pl ([79.96.170.134]:50760 "HELO v094114.home.net.pl" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1752584AbaJFX7z (ORCPT ); Mon, 6 Oct 2014 19:59:55 -0400 From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" To: Linux Kernel Mailing List , Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: Mika Westerberg , ACPI Devel Maling List , Aaron Lu , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Linus Walleij , Alexandre Courbot , Dmitry Torokhov , Bryan Wu , Grant Likely , Arnd Bergmann , Darren Hart , Mark Rutland Subject: [PATCH v4 00/13] Add ACPI _DSD and unified device properties support Date: Tue, 07 Oct 2014 02:10:56 +0200 Message-ID: <2660541.BycO7TFnA2@vostro.rjw.lan> User-Agent: KMail/4.11.5 (Linux/3.16.0-rc5+; KDE/4.11.5; x86_64; ; ) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Everyone, This is version 4 of the unified device properties interface patchset. The original cover letter from Mika is here: http://marc.info/?l=devicetree&m=141087052200600&w=4 My cover letter for version 3 is here: http://marc.info/?l=linux-acpi&m=141212903816560&w=4 One major change from the previous iteration is that now we will use the "compatible" property to match drivers to devices having "PRP0001" as their _HID, so for example the at25 driver doesn't have to add the extra ACPI match table as part of the conversion to the unified interface (patch [05/13] in this series). The second major change is that I've split the driver core patch in two, where the first one ([02/13]) does not contain any stuff related to iterating over the child nodes of a given device. Accordingly, the whole patch series has been rearranged so that the relatively non-controversial patches [01-09/13], most of which have been ACKed already, go first and then goes the second driver core patch ([10/13]) and the other patches related to it. In patches [10-13/13] I used the Arnd's suggestion to implement device_for_each_child_node() as a macro which makes the changes in patches [12-13/13] look more straightforward among other things. I've retained the Greg's ACKs on patches [02/13] and [10/13], because the first of them is things ACKed by Greg only and the change in the second one is just an implementation detail in my opinion (Greg, please let me know if that's inappropriate). Thanks! -- I speak only for myself. Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.