From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S1751579AbcISPDW (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
        Mon, 19 Sep 2016 11:03:22 -0400
Received: from mout.kundenserver.de ([212.227.126.187]:63255 "EHLO
        mout.kundenserver.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
        with ESMTP id S1750970AbcISPDV (ORCPT
        <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Mon, 19 Sep 2016 11:03:21 -0400
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
Cc: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>, Kevin Hilman <khilman@kernel.org>,
        arm@kernel.org, Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com>,
        Kukjin Kim <kgene@kernel.org>, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
        linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@samsung.com>,
        Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@osg.samsung.com>,
        Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL 1/3] ARM: soc: exynos: Drivers for v4.9
Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2016 17:02:40 +0200
Message-ID: <2663426.T8oUku18qe@wuerfel>
User-Agent: KMail/5.1.3 (Linux/4.4.0-34-generic; KDE/5.18.0; x86_64; ; )
In-Reply-To: <1474216788-17282-2-git-send-email-krzk@kernel.org>
References: <1474216788-17282-1-git-send-email-krzk@kernel.org> <1474216788-17282-2-git-send-email-krzk@kernel.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:W2y8Ht7XEkESzQOCfc7dJlft5hbY1Gg7w/9GKqZbmBsDY9D/8bw
 Vls4CZ0dbVC/GKsEkmE4ni61zmzZ6mzgRRjBJtbeoewLjGNtPB5m33udxw5D1XfH0cPhLFV
 HNMpU1dBwRCMV45aVQq7vNbTiWSvb3GNie3kg5TXRZE9v76cgmt49a/NFY13svSEZxQeIpI
 ywwE6iarF+aBXWsoqxg1Q==
X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:ck8jJAKAz+g=:WmKt2pcXbucuAvvwr1Nzuk
 zYfFgZ4faz/D3HGQtSUATihvd8nYljQnpHXjZamhJ//nzA8yzqqR9JH04CGNhOf8to2OhhEC1
 AbktmpVce40qG7CCqOmdWM/p+MskYRyvp53H3tqoAX0+0gJoZyrPjxPe0x1yh5LW8GmFcC7U3
 xJ14N3k8v5DfbGClsmsHSBYXRrzstbCJOQtvYPDkZRFeWYSR0ILaGNTpidMd1DylKhJ96Iprf
 Z4h42/uOLl023BsLg5ZAHhnFeJARimv3zAIeIHoKcOn6zy1SmcFaguRi2tybKpNT/9QuoiF3u
 HtvbCKtN0RobVGdJbXhbm7eD2rjX1wwZ980XLTCjG2kNkdp1p/GSoF4CHY/vsw8dw140F4Xi3
 6VzWgLvxKBTOK3+vgSI5V7YUnlL9yTSSa0Mw7nfYjTnXQv1SRkDr+4XvZ7tgvqTrW5deNzRCp
 nM2IuCyypeWmS6ymbEcNgACQ1zL1T8tADQOLcXMQjiyVuVNqAdOtwhsXTbRJY9smPraW69ZaC
 0yWfZiQ5xM1AXpzFQAY3feBm/5JFrHDi2xM/5NxsX3Z/LVylV3+1rH54YpqQQx+zVgvEgY6Zf
 3QDmfKoGDk+0LEglgfSo5XfieaMC97rX8Z5E61TGxovw+zBVS0L+R/DyB+/ZHruQ5Y0wdqnmf
 klLmGpyE0Ebst2k+am3dNBVy+kP3eeu+8FieXUSQCcO75F/I27I43xaPlLm1uUQcItNkj7/3k
 xNl/7qU+MUxVApP0
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Sunday, September 18, 2016 6:39:46 PM CEST Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> Samsung drivers/soc update for v4.9:
> 1. Allow compile testing of exynos-mct clocksource driver on ARM64.
> 2. Document Exynos5433 PMU compatible (already used by clkout driver and more
>    will be coming soon).

Pulled into next/drivers, thanks

Just for my understanding: why do we need the exynos-mct driver on ARM64
but not the delay-timer portion of it?

Is there an advantage in using MCT over the architected timer on these
chips? If so, should we also have a way to use it as the delay timer?

	Arnd