From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752014AbdAMPCg (ORCPT ); Fri, 13 Jan 2017 10:02:36 -0500 Received: from mail-lf0-f66.google.com ([209.85.215.66]:33905 "EHLO mail-lf0-f66.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751972AbdAMPCd (ORCPT ); Fri, 13 Jan 2017 10:02:33 -0500 Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 3/3] arm: dts: mt2701: Add node for Mediatek JPEG Decoder To: Eddie Huang References: <1479353915-5043-1-git-send-email-rick.chang@mediatek.com> <1479353915-5043-4-git-send-email-rick.chang@mediatek.com> <1479784905.8964.15.camel@mtksdaap41> <1479866054.8964.21.camel@mtksdaap41> <1479894203.8964.29.camel@mtksdaap41> <1483670099.18931.5.camel@mtksdaap41> <974d20f3-5133-0869-2a35-c1617bec5d6e@xs4all.nl> <1484011718.10361.7.camel@mtksdaap41> Cc: Hans Verkuil , Rick Chang , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Laurent Pinchart , Minghsiu Tsai , srv_heupstream@mediatek.com, James Liao , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Rob Herring , Hans Verkuil , linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, Mauro Carvalho Chehab , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-media@vger.kernel.org From: Matthias Brugger Message-ID: <267403e5-18ac-0c74-10ca-cc36b909dfb4@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2017 16:02:27 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1484011718.10361.7.camel@mtksdaap41> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi James, On 10/01/17 02:28, Eddie Huang wrote: > Hi Matthias, > > On Mon, 2017-01-09 at 19:45 +0100, Matthias Brugger wrote: >> >> On 09/01/17 12:29, Hans Verkuil wrote: >>> Hi Rick, >>> >>> On 01/06/2017 03:34 AM, Rick Chang wrote: >>>> Hi Hans, >>>> >>>> The dependence on [1] has been merged in 4.10, but [2] has not.Do you have >>>> any idea about this patch series? Should we wait for [2] or we could merge >>>> the source code and dt-binding first? >>> >>> Looking at [2] I noticed that the last comment was July 4th. What is the reason >>> it hasn't been merged yet? >>> >>> If I know [2] will be merged for 4.11, then I am fine with merging this media >>> patch series. The dependency of this patch on [2] is something Mauro can handle. >>> >>> If [2] is not merged for 4.11, then I think it is better to wait until it is >>> merged. >>> >> >> I can't take [2] because there is no scpsys in the dts present. It seems >> that it got never posted. >> >> Rick can you please follow-up with James and provide a patch which adds >> a scpsys node to the mt2701.dtsi? >> > > James sent three MT2701 dts patches [1] two weeks ago, these three > patches include scpsys node. Please take a reference. And We will send > new MT2701 ionmmu/smi dtsi node patch base on [1] later, thus you can > accept and merge to 4.11. > Thanks for the clarification. I pulled all this patches into v4.10-next/dts32 Hans will you take v9 of this patch set? Then I'll take the dts patch. Regards, Matthias > [1] > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9489991/ > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9489985/ > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9489989/ > > Thanks, > Eddie > >