From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751926AbdIEPFA (ORCPT ); Tue, 5 Sep 2017 11:05:00 -0400 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.101.70]:41856 "EHLO foss.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751031AbdIEPE5 (ORCPT ); Tue, 5 Sep 2017 11:04:57 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 05/18] firmware: arm_scmi: add initial support for performance protocol To: Sudeep Holla , ALKML , LKML , DTML Cc: Nishanth Menon , Harb Abdulhamid , Arnd Bergmann , Jassi Brar , Ryan Harkin , Roy Franz , Loc Ho , Alexey Klimov References: <1501857104-11279-1-git-send-email-sudeep.holla@arm.com> <1501857104-11279-6-git-send-email-sudeep.holla@arm.com> From: Julien Thierry Message-ID: <2690239b-27a7-dce3-88a6-d53808e8e93c@arm.com> Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2017 16:04:53 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.2.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1501857104-11279-6-git-send-email-sudeep.holla@arm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Sudeep, On 04/08/17 15:31, Sudeep Holla wrote: > The performance protocol is intended for the performance management of > group(s) of device(s) that run in the same performance domain. It > includes even the CPUs. A performance domain is defined by a set of > devices that always have to run at the same performance level. > For example, a set of CPUs that share a voltage domain, and have a > common frequency control, is said to be in the same performance domain. > > The commands in this protocol provide functionality to describe the > protocol version, describe various attribute flags, set and get the > performance level of a domain. It also supports discovery of the list > of performance levels supported by a performance domain, and the > properties of each performance level. > > This patch adds basic support for the performance protocol. > > Cc: Arnd Bergmann > Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla > --- > drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/Makefile | 2 +- > drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/common.h | 1 + > drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/perf.c | 511 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > include/linux/scmi_protocol.h | 31 +++ > 4 files changed, 544 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > create mode 100644 drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/perf.c > > diff --git a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/Makefile b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/Makefile > index 21d01d1d6b9c..159de726ee45 100644 > --- a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/Makefile > +++ b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/Makefile > @@ -1,2 +1,2 @@ > obj-$(CONFIG_ARM_SCMI_PROTOCOL) = arm_scmi.o > -arm_scmi-y = base.o driver.o > +arm_scmi-y = base.o driver.o perf.o > diff --git a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/common.h b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/common.h > index e3fe5d9acc82..7473dfcad4ee 100644 > --- a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/common.h > +++ b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/common.h > @@ -30,6 +30,7 @@ > #define PROTOCOL_REV_MAJOR(x) ((x) >> PROTOCOL_REV_MINOR_BITS) > #define PROTOCOL_REV_MINOR(x) ((x) & PROTOCOL_REV_MINOR_MASK) > #define MAX_PROTOCOLS_IMP 16 > +#define MAX_OPPS 16 > > enum scmi_std_protocol { > SCMI_PROTOCOL_BASE = 0x10, > diff --git a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/perf.c b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/perf.c > new file mode 100644 > index 000000000000..13d84d829201 > --- /dev/null > +++ b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/perf.c > @@ -0,0 +1,511 @@ > +/* > + * System Control and Management Interface (SCMI) Performance Protocol > + * > + * Copyright (C) 2017 ARM Ltd. > + * > + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it > + * under the terms and conditions of the GNU General Public License, > + * version 2, as published by the Free Software Foundation. > + * > + * This program is distributed in the hope it will be useful, but WITHOUT > + * ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of MERCHANTABILITY or > + * FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the GNU General Public License for > + * more details. > + * > + * You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License along > + * with this program. If not, see . > + */ > + > +#include > +#include > +#include > +#include > + > +#include "common.h" > + > +enum scmi_performance_protocol_cmd { > + PERF_DOMAIN_ATTRIBUTES = 0x3, > + PERF_DESCRIBE_LEVELS = 0x4, > + PERF_LIMITS_SET = 0x5, > + PERF_LIMITS_GET = 0x6, > + PERF_LEVEL_SET = 0x7, > + PERF_LEVEL_GET = 0x8, > + PERF_NOTIFY_LIMITS = 0x9, > + PERF_NOTIFY_LEVEL = 0xa, > +}; > + > +struct scmi_opp { > + u32 perf; > + u32 power; > + u32 trans_latency_us; > +}; > + > +struct scmi_msg_resp_perf_attributes { > + __le16 num_domains; > + __le16 flags; > +#define POWER_SCALE_IN_MILLIWATT(x) ((x) & BIT(0)) > + __le32 stats_addr_low; > + __le32 stats_addr_high; > + __le32 stats_size; > +}; > + > +struct scmi_msg_resp_perf_domain_attributes { > + __le32 flags; > +#define SUPPORTS_SET_LIMITS(x) ((x) & BIT(31)) > +#define SUPPORTS_SET_PERF_LVL(x) ((x) & BIT(30)) > +#define SUPPORTS_PERF_LIMIT_NOTIFY(x) ((x) & BIT(29)) > +#define SUPPORTS_PERF_LEVEL_NOTIFY(x) ((x) & BIT(28)) > + __le32 rate_limit_us; > + __le32 sustained_freq_khz; > + __le32 sustained_perf_level; > + u8 name[SCMI_MAX_STR_SIZE]; > +}; > + > +struct scmi_msg_perf_describe_levels { > + __le32 domain; > + __le32 level_index; > +}; > + > +struct scmi_perf_set_limits { > + __le32 domain; > + __le32 max_level; > + __le32 min_level; > +}; > + > +struct scmi_perf_get_limits { > + __le32 max_level; > + __le32 min_level; > +}; > + > +struct scmi_perf_set_level { > + __le32 domain; > + __le32 level; > +}; > + > +struct scmi_perf_notify_level_or_limits { > + __le32 domain; > + __le32 notify_enable; > +}; > + > +struct scmi_msg_resp_perf_describe_levels { > + __le16 num_returned; > + __le16 num_remaining; > + struct { > + __le32 perf_val; > + __le32 power; > + __le16 transition_latency_us; > + __le16 reserved; > + } opp[0]; > +}; > + > +struct perf_dom_info { > + bool set_limits; > + bool set_perf; > + bool perf_limit_notify; > + bool perf_level_notify; > + u32 opp_count; > + u32 sustained_freq_khz; > + u32 sustained_perf_level; > + u32 mult_factor; > + char name[SCMI_MAX_STR_SIZE]; > + struct scmi_opp opp[MAX_OPPS]; > +}; > + > +struct scmi_perf_info { > + int num_domains; > + bool power_scale_mw; > + u64 stats_addr; > + u32 stats_size; > + struct perf_dom_info *dom_info; > +}; > + > +static struct scmi_perf_info perf_info; > + > +static int scmi_perf_attributes_get(const struct scmi_handle *handle, > + struct scmi_perf_info *perf_info) > +{ > + int ret; > + struct scmi_xfer *t; > + struct scmi_msg_resp_perf_attributes *attr; > + > + ret = scmi_one_xfer_init(handle, PROTOCOL_ATTRIBUTES, > + SCMI_PROTOCOL_PERF, 0, sizeof(*attr), &t); > + if (ret) > + return ret; > + > + attr = t->rx.buf; > + > + ret = scmi_do_xfer(handle, t); > + if (!ret) { > + u16 flags = le16_to_cpu(attr->flags); > + > + perf_info->num_domains = le16_to_cpu(attr->num_domains); > + perf_info->power_scale_mw = POWER_SCALE_IN_MILLIWATT(flags); > + perf_info->stats_addr = le32_to_cpu(attr->stats_addr_low) | > + (u64)le32_to_cpu(attr->stats_addr_high) << 32; This seems odd, shouldn't it be the following? le64_to_cpu(attr->stats_addr_low | (__le64)attr->stats_addr_high << 32) Cheers, -- Julien Thierry