From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S936319AbcKNTgw (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Nov 2016 14:36:52 -0500 Received: from mail-wm0-f47.google.com ([74.125.82.47]:38059 "EHLO mail-wm0-f47.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S935028AbcKNTgt (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Nov 2016 14:36:49 -0500 Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] mfd: pm8xxx: add support to pm8821 To: Bjorn Andersson References: <1479145933-9849-1-git-send-email-srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org> <20161114185621.GC27931@tuxbot> Cc: Lee Jones , Rob Herring , Andy Gross , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-soc@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org From: Srinivas Kandagatla Message-ID: <26a22b4a-261c-ef8b-8979-8e6628965c39@linaro.org> Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2016 19:36:46 +0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20161114185621.GC27931@tuxbot> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 14/11/16 18:56, Bjorn Andersson wrote: > On Mon 14 Nov 09:52 PST 2016, Srinivas Kandagatla wrote: > >> This patch adds support to PM8821 PMIC and interrupt support. >> PM8821 is companion device that supplements primary PMIC PM8921 IC. >> >> Signed-off-by: Srinivas Kandagatla >> Acked-by: Rob Herring >> --- >> Changes from v1: >> - Removed unnessary locking spotted by Bjorn >> - updated register naming to reflect PM8821 >> - lot of cleanups suggested by Bjorn >> - rebased on top of Linus Walleij's pm8xxx namespace >> cleanup patch. > > Looks good, just some minor style nits below. Thanks, I will address all the comments in next version. > >> >> .../devicetree/bindings/mfd/qcom-pm8xxx.txt | 1 + >> drivers/mfd/qcom-pm8xxx.c | 247 ++++++++++++++++++++- >> 2 files changed, 238 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/qcom-pm8xxx.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/qcom-pm8xxx.txt >> index 37a088f..8f1b4ec 100644 >> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/qcom-pm8xxx.txt >> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/qcom-pm8xxx.txt >> @@ -11,6 +11,7 @@ voltages and other various functionality to Qualcomm SoCs. >> Definition: must be one of: >> "qcom,pm8058" >> "qcom,pm8921" >> + "qcom,pm8821" > > 8 < 9, so move it one step up please. sure.. makes sense. > >> >> - #address-cells: >> Usage: required >> diff --git a/drivers/mfd/qcom-pm8xxx.c b/drivers/mfd/qcom-pm8xxx.c > [..] >> +#define PM8821_SSBI_REG_ADDR_IRQ_BASE 0x100 >> +#define PM8821_SSBI_REG_ADDR_IRQ_MASTER0 (PM8821_SSBI_REG_ADDR_IRQ_BASE + 0x30) >> +#define PM8821_SSBI_REG_ADDR_IRQ_MASTER1 (PM8821_SSBI_REG_ADDR_IRQ_BASE + 0xb0) >> +#define PM8821_SSBI_REG(m, b, offset) \ >> + ((m == 0) ? \ >> + (PM8821_SSBI_REG_ADDR_IRQ_MASTER0 + b + offset) : \ >> + (PM8821_SSBI_REG_ADDR_IRQ_MASTER1 + b + offset)) >> +#define PM8821_SSBI_ADDR_IRQ_ROOT(m, b) PM8821_SSBI_REG(m, b, 0x0) >> +#define PM8821_SSBI_ADDR_IRQ_CLEAR(m, b) PM8821_SSBI_REG(m, b, 0x01) >> +#define PM8821_SSBI_ADDR_IRQ_MASK(m, b) PM8821_SSBI_REG(m, b, 0x08) >> +#define PM8821_SSBI_ADDR_IRQ_RT_STATUS(m, b) PM8821_SSBI_REG(m, b, 0x0f) > > I like how this cleaned up the rest of the implementation. > > [..] > >> +static void pm8821_irq_block_handler(struct pm_irq_chip *chip, >> + int master, int block) >> +{ >> + int pmirq, irq, i, ret; >> + unsigned int bits; >> + >> + ret = regmap_read(chip->regmap, >> + PM8821_SSBI_ADDR_IRQ_ROOT(master, block), &bits); >> + if (ret) { >> + pr_err("Failed reading %d block ret=%d", block, ret); > > "Reading block %d failed ret=%d" yep. > >> + return; >> + } >> + if (!bits) { >> + pr_err("block bit set in master but no irqs: %d", block); > > This seems more like a debug thing, either showing missbehaving hardware > or something odd in the driver. I think you should drop the print or > make it pr_debug(). okay. > >> + return; >> + } > > I would prefer that you just drop the entire if statement, it's just an > corner case optimization with a info print. > i will have a closer look at this part once again. >> + >> + /* Convert block offset to global block number */ >> + block += (master * PM8821_BLOCKS_PER_MASTER) - 1; >> + >> + /* Check IRQ bits */ >> + for (i = 0; i < 8; i++) { >> + if (bits & BIT(i)) { >> + pmirq = block * 8 + i; >> + irq = irq_find_mapping(chip->irqdomain, pmirq); >> + generic_handle_irq(irq); >> + } >> + } >> + > > Empty line will fix all the empty lines in next version. > >> +} >> + >> +static inline void pm8821_irq_master_handler(struct pm_irq_chip *chip, >> + int master, u8 master_val) >> +{ >> + int block; >> + >> + for (block = 1; block < 8; block++) >> + if (master_val & BIT(block)) >> + pm8821_irq_block_handler(chip, master, block); >> + > > Empty line > >> +} >> + >> +static void pm8821_irq_handler(struct irq_desc *desc) >> +{ >> + struct pm_irq_chip *chip = irq_desc_get_handler_data(desc); >> + struct irq_chip *irq_chip = irq_desc_get_chip(desc); >> + unsigned int master; >> + int ret; >> + >> + chained_irq_enter(irq_chip, desc); >> + ret = regmap_read(chip->regmap, >> + PM8821_SSBI_REG_ADDR_IRQ_MASTER0, &master); >> + if (ret) { >> + pr_err("Failed to re:Qad master 0 ret=%d\n", ret); > ^ > | > I see you're using vim :) > >> + return; >> + } >> + >> + /* bits 1 through 7 marks the first 7 blocks in master 0*/ > > Indentation > >> + if (master & GENMASK(7, 1)) >> + pm8821_irq_master_handler(chip, 0, master); >> + >> + /* bit 0 marks if master 1 contains any bits */ > > Dito yep. > >> + if (!(master & BIT(0))) >> + goto done; >> + >> + ret = regmap_read(chip->regmap, >> + PM8821_SSBI_REG_ADDR_IRQ_MASTER1, &master); >> + if (ret) { >> + pr_err("Failed to read master 1 ret=%d\n", ret); >> + return; > > "goto done;" so that we pass chained_irq_exit() yes, > >> + } >> + >> + pm8821_irq_master_handler(chip, 1, master); >> + >> +done: >> + chained_irq_exit(irq_chip, desc); >> +} >> + > > [..] > >> +static void pm8821_irq_mask_ack(struct irq_data *d) >> +{ >> + struct pm_irq_chip *chip = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d); >> + unsigned int pmirq = irqd_to_hwirq(d); >> + u8 block, master; >> + int irq_bit, rc; >> + >> + block = pmirq / 8; >> + master = block / PM8821_BLOCKS_PER_MASTER; >> + irq_bit = pmirq % 8; >> + block %= PM8821_BLOCKS_PER_MASTER; >> + >> + rc = regmap_update_bits(chip->regmap, >> + PM8821_SSBI_ADDR_IRQ_MASK(master, block), >> + BIT(irq_bit), BIT(irq_bit)); >> + > > Empty line > >> + if (rc) { >> + pr_err("Failed to read/write mask IRQ:%d rc=%d\n", pmirq, rc); > > "Failed to mask IRQ %d rc=%d\n" > >> + return; >> + } >> + >> + rc = regmap_update_bits(chip->regmap, >> + PM8821_SSBI_ADDR_IRQ_CLEAR(master, block), >> + BIT(irq_bit), BIT(irq_bit)); >> + > > Empty line > >> + if (rc) { >> + pr_err("Failed to read/write IT_CLEAR IRQ:%d rc=%d\n", >> + pmirq, rc); > > "Failed to clear IRQ %d rc=%d\n" > >> + } >> + > > Empty line > >> +} >> + >> +static void pm8821_irq_unmask(struct irq_data *d) >> +{ >> + struct pm_irq_chip *chip = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d); >> + unsigned int pmirq = irqd_to_hwirq(d); >> + int irq_bit, rc; >> + u8 block, master; >> + >> + block = pmirq / 8; >> + master = block / PM8821_BLOCKS_PER_MASTER; >> + irq_bit = pmirq % 8; >> + block %= PM8821_BLOCKS_PER_MASTER; >> + >> + rc = regmap_update_bits(chip->regmap, >> + PM8821_SSBI_ADDR_IRQ_MASK(master, block), >> + BIT(irq_bit), ~BIT(irq_bit)); >> + > > Empty line > >> + if (rc) >> + pr_err("Failed to read/write unmask IRQ:%d rc=%d\n", pmirq, rc); > > "Failed to unmask IRQ %d rc=%d\n" will update it in next version. > >> + > > Empty line > >> +} >> + >> +static int pm8821_irq_get_irqchip_state(struct irq_data *d, >> + enum irqchip_irq_state which, >> + bool *state) >> +{ >> + struct pm_irq_chip *chip = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d); >> + int rc, pmirq = irqd_to_hwirq(d); >> + u8 block, irq_bit, master; >> + unsigned int bits; >> + >> + block = pmirq / 8; >> + master = block / PM8821_BLOCKS_PER_MASTER; >> + irq_bit = pmirq % 8; >> + block %= PM8821_BLOCKS_PER_MASTER; >> + >> + rc = regmap_read(chip->regmap, >> + PM8821_SSBI_ADDR_IRQ_RT_STATUS(master, block), &bits); >> + if (rc) { >> + pr_err("Failed Reading Status rc=%d\n", rc); > > Odd capitalization, I suggest that you match it to the other functions > by: > > "Reading status of IRQ %d failed rc=%d\n" > Okay >> + return rc; >> + } >> + >> + *state = !!(bits & BIT(irq_bit)); >> + >> + return rc; >> +} >> + > > [..] > >> >> static int pm8xxx_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) >> { >> + const struct of_device_id *match; >> + const struct pm_irq_data *data; >> struct regmap *regmap; >> int irq, rc; >> unsigned int val; >> u32 rev; >> struct pm_irq_chip *chip; >> - unsigned int nirqs = PM8XXX_NR_IRQS; >> + >> + match = of_match_node(pm8xxx_id_table, pdev->dev.of_node); >> + if (!match) { >> + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "No matching driver data found\n"); >> + return -EINVAL; >> + } >> + >> + data = match->data; > > data = of_device_get_match_data(&pdev->dev); (from of_device.h) This is good one.. I will use it in next version. > Regards, > Bjorn >