From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758122Ab3D2NZb (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Apr 2013 09:25:31 -0400 Received: from mail-pa0-f49.google.com ([209.85.220.49]:61955 "EHLO mail-pa0-f49.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1758084Ab3D2NZ0 (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Apr 2013 09:25:26 -0400 From: Viresh Kumar To: rjw@sisk.pl Cc: linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org, patches@linaro.org, cpufreq@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, robin.randhawa@arm.com, Steve.Bannister@arm.com, Liviu.Dudau@arm.com, charles.garcia-tobin@arm.com, arvind.chauhan@arm.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Viresh Kumar Subject: [PATCH 2/5] cpufreq: ARM big LITTLE DT: Return correct transition latency Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2013 18:54:45 +0530 Message-Id: <26f5713ba03a7d5ee590ce615d19578eb4395abe.1367241503.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 1.7.12.rc2.18.g61b472e In-Reply-To: References: In-Reply-To: References: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org By mistake we are returning zero for successful call to dt_get_transition_latency(), whereas we should return transition_latency. Fix it. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar --- drivers/cpufreq/arm_big_little_dt.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/arm_big_little_dt.c b/drivers/cpufreq/arm_big_little_dt.c index 44be311..d5ae4d2 100644 --- a/drivers/cpufreq/arm_big_little_dt.c +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/arm_big_little_dt.c @@ -78,7 +78,7 @@ static int dt_get_transition_latency(struct device *cpu_dev) of_node_put(np); of_node_put(parent); - return 0; + return transition_latency; } return -ENODEV; -- 1.7.12.rc2.18.g61b472e