From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753068AbbDBMEy (ORCPT ); Thu, 2 Apr 2015 08:04:54 -0400 Received: from mailout3.samsung.com ([203.254.224.33]:33105 "EHLO mailout3.samsung.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753001AbbDBMEv (ORCPT ); Thu, 2 Apr 2015 08:04:51 -0400 X-AuditID: cbfee61a-f79c06d000004e71-54-551d30603adc From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz To: Thomas Schlichter Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Len Brown , Daniel Lezcano , linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] fix sysfs showing the correct C-states after AC->DC and DC->AC transitions Date: Thu, 02 Apr 2015 14:04:35 +0200 Message-id: <2713092.F08tekMTF5@amdc1032> User-Agent: KMail/4.8.4 (Linux/3.2.0-70-generic-pae; KDE/4.8.5; i686; ; ) In-reply-to: <3701793.GEjYLvWeTc@netbook> References: <3701793.GEjYLvWeTc@netbook> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-transfer-encoding: 7Bit Content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFrrNLMWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsVy+t9jQd1EA9lQg7vP2SzmfZa12PnwLZvF 8n39jBaXd81hs/jce4TR4szpS6wWc741Mzuwe2xa1cnmcefaHjaPLVfbWTw+b5LzuP1sG0sA axSXTUpqTmZZapG+XQJXxpRFPUwFU8UqZix4xdzAeFKwi5GTQ0LARGLztYesELaYxIV769m6 GLk4hASmM0psfLaKCcL5xijx++UERpAqNgEriYntq8BsEQEDiYkHzoB1MAucAepYeJcNJCEs kCjxvncZC4jNIqAq0XJgFhOIzSugKXG0uQ8sLirgKbFz+gGwQZxA8Q9v5wKdwQG0TUNi76sU iHJBiR+T74GVMwvIS+zbP5UVwtaR2N86jW0Co8AsJGWzkJTNQlK2gJF5FaNoakFyQXFSeq6h XnFibnFpXrpecn7uJkZwkD+T2sG4ssHiEKMAB6MSD2/GHplQIdbEsuLK3EOMEhzMSiK8D7Rl Q4V4UxIrq1KL8uOLSnNSiw8xSnOwKInzKtm3hQgJpCeWpGanphakFsFkmTg4pRoYV2z7yLbt 7zw38225urqcTSzcR1V/cWRKm/KFus+yCYurqt6/R1a4633c3Ll1rYWt/95u/Ozd3rVKS4rp 8v3HR1/zV5f/m+1hcVHpKt9JlYrStwFbjCsmvtP5ov4pM3SWwvWd9+fz8Jv1LhL7cUlueteV 6rUttgeeBb6rXZoZGpp9lM/7vr6LEktxRqKhFnNRcSIAjd3tRG4CAAA= Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wednesday, April 01, 2015 08:04:34 PM Thomas Schlichter wrote: > Hello, Hi, > I do have a Samsung NC20 netbook which provides the C-states C1 and C2 to the > OS when connected to AC, and additionally provides the C3 C-state when > disconnected from AC. With the current kernels I have these two problems > (regressions): > > 1. The number of C-states shown in sysfs is fixed to the number of C-states > present at boot. > If I boot with AC connected, I always only see the C-states up to C2 even > if I disconnect AC. > > The reason is commit 130a5f692425e6237229598a8624da0a247f33d5 > "ACPI / cpuidle: remove dev->state_count setting". It removes the update of > dev->state_count, but sysfs uses exactly this variable to show the > C-states. > > The fix is to use drv->state_count in sysfs. As this is currently the last > user of dev->state_count, this variable can be completely removed. And this > is exactly what Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz's not yet applied patch "[PATCH > v2 9/9] cpuidle: remove state_count field from struct cpuidle_device" > http://marc.info/?m=138756533317836 does. > > Long story short: That patch fixes problem 1 for me. Rafael, please apply that patch (as Thomas has noticed it is required to fix issue with dynamic dev/drv->state_count updates, sorry for not catching it earlier). [ Originally the whole series was dropped when patch #8 ("[PATCH v2 8/9] intel_idle: use the common cpuidle_[un]register() routines") turned out to introduce some problems. Patches #1-7 were later re-merged but not patch #9 (which is independent of patch #8). ] > 2. After a AC->DC or DC->AC transition, the name and description of the > POLLING C-state become "". > > Here, the reason is commit d7c7f103262bc2248548ed0e113e916e843c4eeb > "cpuidle: don't call poll_idle_init() for every cpu". It only calls > poll_idle_init() during cpuidle_register_driver() instead of > cpuidle_enable_device() and thus does not re-initialize the fields of > drv->states[0] after acpi_processor_setup_cpuidle_states() cleared them. > > Here, the fix is to _not_ clear drv->states[0] in > acpi_processor_setup_cpuidle_states(). For this purpose I created a small > patch. This patch looks fine to me. FWIW: Reviewed-by: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz > For your convenience, both of the fixing patches are attached to this mail. > The first one is necessary for all kernels since 3.14, the second one for all > kernels since 3.13. So I'd propose to push both of them also to the necessary > stable kernels. Sounds good to me. Thank you for working on this. Best regards, -- Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz Samsung R&D Institute Poland Samsung Electronics