linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Liu, Chuansheng" <chuansheng.liu@intel.com>
To: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>,
	"peterz@infradead.org" <peterz@infradead.org>,
	"luto@amacapital.net" <luto@amacapital.net>,
	"rjw@rjwysocki.net" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
	"mingo@redhat.com" <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: "linux-pm@vger.kernel.org" <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Liu, Changcheng" <changcheng.liu@intel.com>,
	"Wang, Xiaoming" <xiaoming.wang@intel.com>,
	"Chakravarty, Souvik K" <souvik.k.chakravarty@intel.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 3/3] cpuidle: Using the wake_up_all_idle_cpus() to wake up all idle cpus
Date: Thu, 4 Sep 2014 13:39:38 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <27240C0AC20F114CBF8149A2696CBE4A01E6B3E3@SHSMSX101.ccr.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <540862AA.7060907@linaro.org>

[-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --]
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8", Size: 1698 bytes --]



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Daniel Lezcano [mailto:daniel.lezcano@linaro.org]
> Sent: Thursday, September 04, 2014 9:02 PM
> To: Liu, Chuansheng; peterz@infradead.org; luto@amacapital.net;
> rjw@rjwysocki.net; mingo@redhat.com
> Cc: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; Liu, Changcheng;
> Wang, Xiaoming; Chakravarty, Souvik K
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] cpuidle: Using the wake_up_all_idle_cpus() to wake up
> all idle cpus
> 
> On 09/04/2014 09:17 AM, Chuansheng Liu wrote:
> > Currently kick_all_cpus_sync() or smp_call_function() can not
> > break the polling idle cpu immediately.
> >
> > Here using wake_up_all_idle_cpus() which can wake up the polling idle
> > cpu quickly is much helpful for power.
> 
> Acked-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
> 
> So IIUC, kick_all_cpus_sync is a broken function, right ?
> 
> Wouldn't make sense to replace all calls to kick_all_cpus by
> wake_up_all_idle_cpus ? and remove this broken function ?
My initial patch(V1) indeed do it, but Andy pointed out some callers of kick_all_cpus_sync()
really want the old behavior.

My fault again that do not have the detailed changelog for the patches.

Pasted the comments from Andy:
==
> Currently using smp_call_function() just woke up the corresponding
> cpu, but can not break the polling idle loop.
>
> Here using the new sched API wake_up_if_idle() to implement it.

kick_all_cpus_sync has other callers, and those other callers want the
old behavior.  I think this should be a new function.

--Andy
==


ÿôèº{.nÇ+‰·Ÿ®‰­†+%ŠËÿ±éݶ\x17¥Šwÿº{.nÇ+‰·¥Š{±þG«éÿŠ{ayº\x1dʇڙë,j\a­¢f£¢·hšïêÿ‘êçz_è®\x03(­éšŽŠÝ¢j"ú\x1a¶^[m§ÿÿ¾\a«þG«éÿ¢¸?™¨è­Ú&£ø§~á¶iO•æ¬z·švØ^\x14\x04\x1a¶^[m§ÿÿÃ\fÿ¶ìÿ¢¸?–I¥

  reply	other threads:[~2014-09-04 13:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-09-04  7:17 [PATCH 1/3] sched: Add new API wake_up_if_idle() to wake up the idle cpu Chuansheng Liu
2014-09-04  7:17 ` [PATCH 2/3] smp: Adding new function wake_up_all_idle_cpus() Chuansheng Liu
2014-09-04 12:56   ` Daniel Lezcano
2014-09-19 11:44   ` [tip:sched/core] smp: Add new wake_up_all_idle_cpus() function tip-bot for Chuansheng Liu
2014-09-04  7:17 ` [PATCH 3/3] cpuidle: Using the wake_up_all_idle_cpus() to wake up all idle cpus Chuansheng Liu
2014-09-04 13:01   ` Daniel Lezcano
2014-09-04 13:39     ` Liu, Chuansheng [this message]
2014-09-04 15:47       ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-09-19 11:44   ` [tip:sched/core] cpuidle: Use " tip-bot for Chuansheng Liu
2014-09-04 12:53 ` [PATCH 1/3] sched: Add new API wake_up_if_idle() to wake up the idle cpu Daniel Lezcano
2014-09-04 12:59   ` Liu, Chuansheng
2014-09-19 11:43 ` [tip:sched/core] " tip-bot for Chuansheng Liu
2014-12-19 20:23   ` Andy Lutomirski

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=27240C0AC20F114CBF8149A2696CBE4A01E6B3E3@SHSMSX101.ccr.corp.intel.com \
    --to=chuansheng.liu@intel.com \
    --cc=changcheng.liu@intel.com \
    --cc=daniel.lezcano@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luto@amacapital.net \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
    --cc=souvik.k.chakravarty@intel.com \
    --cc=xiaoming.wang@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).