From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2E36C83001 for ; Wed, 29 Apr 2020 02:22:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A055420730 for ; Wed, 29 Apr 2020 02:22:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726508AbgD2CWh (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 Apr 2020 22:22:37 -0400 Received: from mga02.intel.com ([134.134.136.20]:27001 "EHLO mga02.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726345AbgD2CWh (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 Apr 2020 22:22:37 -0400 IronPort-SDR: EdC5keMdWAhCEJxNwy2BYRZNsuUm1zQl38wiXZrGLAMMQ13u4I+6BtjSuQiP120wXD2yQocPvu yGNjKeQaqGLQ== X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from orsmga007.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.58]) by orsmga101.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 28 Apr 2020 19:22:37 -0700 IronPort-SDR: t/qSzNPhjbSFSg3fCjJzj3YTdCvW1TlKbhSmmEST7wnCHVJo0xkfWM5OPrCfhuevcOufHCdsZv 3ikcNbOtcXfw== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.73,329,1583222400"; d="scan'208";a="246698532" Received: from blu2-mobl3.ccr.corp.intel.com (HELO [10.254.208.67]) ([10.254.208.67]) by orsmga007.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 28 Apr 2020 19:22:33 -0700 Cc: baolu.lu@linux.intel.com, tsoni@codeaurora.org, virtio-dev@lists.oasis-open.org, konrad.wilk@oracle.com, jan.kiszka@siemens.com, jasowang@redhat.com, christoffer.dall@arm.com, virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, alex.bennee@linaro.org, iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, stefano.stabellini@xilinx.com, will@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, pratikp@codeaurora.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] virtio: Add bounce DMA ops To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" , Srivatsa Vaddagiri References: <1588073958-1793-1-git-send-email-vatsa@codeaurora.org> <1588073958-1793-6-git-send-email-vatsa@codeaurora.org> <20200428121232-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> <20200428174952.GA5097@quicinc.com> <20200428163448-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> From: Lu Baolu Message-ID: <275eba4b-dd35-aa95-b2e3-9c5cbf7c6d71@linux.intel.com> Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2020 10:22:32 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20200428163448-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 2020/4/29 4:41, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 11:19:52PM +0530, Srivatsa Vaddagiri wrote: >> * Michael S. Tsirkin [2020-04-28 12:17:57]: >> >>> Okay, but how is all this virtio specific? For example, why not allow >>> separate swiotlbs for any type of device? >>> For example, this might make sense if a given device is from a >>> different, less trusted vendor. >> Is swiotlb commonly used for multiple devices that may be on different trust >> boundaries (and not behind a hardware iommu)? > Even a hardware iommu does not imply a 100% security from malicious > hardware. First lots of people use iommu=pt for performance reasons. > Second even without pt, unmaps are often batched, and sub-page buffers > might be used for DMA, so we are not 100% protected at all times. > For untrusted devices, IOMMU is forced on even iommu=pt is used; and iotlb flush is in strict mode (no batched flushes); ATS is also not allowed. Swiotlb is used to protect sub-page buffers since IOMMU can only apply page granularity protection. Swiotlb is now used for devices from different trust zone. Best regards, baolu