From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751430AbWCCNAY (ORCPT ); Fri, 3 Mar 2006 08:00:24 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751409AbWCCNAX (ORCPT ); Fri, 3 Mar 2006 08:00:23 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([66.187.233.31]:24801 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751327AbWCCNAX (ORCPT ); Fri, 3 Mar 2006 08:00:23 -0500 From: David Howells In-Reply-To: <20060303034552.5fcedc49.akpm@osdl.org> References: <20060303034552.5fcedc49.akpm@osdl.org> <20060302213356.7282.26463.stgit@warthog.cambridge.redhat.com> <25676.1141385408@warthog.cambridge.redhat.com> To: Andrew Morton Cc: David Howells , torvalds@osdl.org, steved@redhat.com, trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no, aviro@redhat.com, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-cachefs@redhat.com, nfsv4@linux-nfs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/5] Optimise d_find_alias() X-Mailer: MH-E 7.92+cvs; nmh 1.1; GNU Emacs 22.0.50.4 Date: Fri, 03 Mar 2006 13:00:10 +0000 Message-ID: <27600.1141390810@warthog.cambridge.redhat.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Andrew Morton wrote: > How can we get away without a barrier? Is this what you're thinking of: struct dentry * d_find_alias(struct inode *inode) { struct dentry *de = NULL; smp_rb(); if (!list_empty(&inode->i_dentry)) { spin_lock(&dcache_lock); de = __d_find_alias(inode, 0); spin_unlock(&dcache_lock); } return de; } David