From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78A6BC4320A for ; Thu, 19 Aug 2021 11:51:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5557E610D2 for ; Thu, 19 Aug 2021 11:51:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S238361AbhHSLvm (ORCPT ); Thu, 19 Aug 2021 07:51:42 -0400 Received: from pegase2.c-s.fr ([93.17.235.10]:54737 "EHLO pegase2.c-s.fr" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S238105AbhHSLvl (ORCPT ); Thu, 19 Aug 2021 07:51:41 -0400 Received: from localhost (mailhub3.si.c-s.fr [172.26.127.67]) by localhost (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4Gr34l5TcZz9sVF; Thu, 19 Aug 2021 13:51:03 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at c-s.fr Received: from pegase2.c-s.fr ([172.26.127.65]) by localhost (pegase2.c-s.fr [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8ARKzqg-cxod; Thu, 19 Aug 2021 13:51:03 +0200 (CEST) Received: from messagerie.si.c-s.fr (messagerie.si.c-s.fr [192.168.25.192]) by pegase2.c-s.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4Gr34l4VMRz9sV3; Thu, 19 Aug 2021 13:51:03 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by messagerie.si.c-s.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3ED028B764; Thu, 19 Aug 2021 13:51:03 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at c-s.fr Received: from messagerie.si.c-s.fr ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (messagerie.si.c-s.fr [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10023) with ESMTP id IQcQ15z_cd96; Thu, 19 Aug 2021 13:51:03 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [172.25.230.102] (po15451.idsi0.si.c-s.fr [172.25.230.102]) by messagerie.si.c-s.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id E94A48B836; Thu, 19 Aug 2021 13:51:02 +0200 (CEST) Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] Kconfig symbol fixes on powerpc To: Lukas Bulwahn , Paul Mackerras , Michael Ellerman , Benjamin Herrenschmidt , Michael Neuling , Anshuman Khandual , kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20210819113954.17515-1-lukas.bulwahn@gmail.com> From: Christophe Leroy Message-ID: <2784c69e-898d-3a40-a0f7-b7769a57980b@csgroup.eu> Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2021 13:50:57 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.13.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20210819113954.17515-1-lukas.bulwahn@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: fr Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Le 19/08/2021 à 13:39, Lukas Bulwahn a écrit : > Dear powerpc maintainers, > > The script ./scripts/checkkconfigsymbols.py warns on invalid references to > Kconfig symbols (often, minor typos, name confusions or outdated references). > > This patch series addresses all issues reported by > ./scripts/checkkconfigsymbols.py in ./drivers/usb/ for Kconfig and Makefile > files. Issues in the Kconfig and Makefile files indicate some shortcomings in > the overall build definitions, and often are true actionable issues to address. > > These issues can be identified and filtered by: > > ./scripts/checkkconfigsymbols.py | grep -E "arch/powerpc/.*(Kconfig|Makefile)" -B 1 -A 1 > > After applying this patch series on linux-next (next-20210817), the command > above yields just two false positives (SHELL, r13) due to tool shortcomings. > > As these two patches are fixes, please consider if they are suitable for > backporting to stable. > > v1 -> v2: > Followed Christophe Leroy's comment and drop the obsolete select. > No need to change anything now, but as your two patches are completely independent, you could have submitted them separately. That would have avoided to resend both when changing the first one only.