From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1947408Ab3BHXuN (ORCPT ); Fri, 8 Feb 2013 18:50:13 -0500 Received: from hydra.sisk.pl ([212.160.235.94]:35584 "EHLO hydra.sisk.pl" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1947361Ab3BHXuL (ORCPT ); Fri, 8 Feb 2013 18:50:11 -0500 From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" To: Viresh Kumar Cc: valdis.kletnieks@vt.edu, artem.savkov@gmail.com, cpufreq@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org, robin.randhawa@arm.com, Steve.Bannister@arm.com, Liviu.Dudau@arm.com, Nathan Zimmer Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] CPUFreq Fixes for 3.9 Date: Sat, 09 Feb 2013 00:56:31 +0100 Message-ID: <2792362.JXCag4GJsR@vostro.rjw.lan> User-Agent: KMail/4.9.5 (Linux/3.8.0-rc6; KDE/4.9.5; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: <1653071.l2kN4Hy2U6@vostro.rjw.lan> References: <1653071.l2kN4Hy2U6@vostro.rjw.lan> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Friday, February 08, 2013 09:02:37 PM Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Friday, February 08, 2013 08:06:52 PM Viresh Kumar wrote: > > On 8 February 2013 18:02, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > So as I said, please rework the fixes on top of linux-pm.git/pm-cpufreq. > > > > I already did. Please check for-rafael branch > > Cool. This is the one I'm supposed to apply, then? OK, applied to bleeding-edge. Hopefully it will be build-tested over the weekend and I can move it to linux-next. I dropped the rwlock/RCU patches from Nathan, though, because I had some doubts about the correctness of the RCU one and the rwlock one alone would conflict with your further changes. Thanks, Rafael -- I speak only for myself. Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.