From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DE0AC6786E for ; Fri, 26 Oct 2018 15:53:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53E9E20831 for ; Fri, 26 Oct 2018 15:53:24 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 53E9E20831 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=columbia.edu Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727377AbeJ0Aa4 (ORCPT ); Fri, 26 Oct 2018 20:30:56 -0400 Received: from moglen4.apt.columbia.edu ([160.39.60.15]:47573 "EHLO moglen4.apt.columbia.edu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726113AbeJ0Aa4 (ORCPT ); Fri, 26 Oct 2018 20:30:56 -0400 Received: from localhost (moglen1.apt.columbia.edu [160.39.60.12]) by moglen4.apt.columbia.edu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6B11A2E0158; Fri, 26 Oct 2018 15:53:21 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2018 11:53:20 -0400 Message-Id: <2835-Fri26Oct2018115320-0400-eben@harlan.sflc-vpn> X-Mailer: emacs 23; VM 8.1.0 under 23.2.1 (i486-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: esr@thyrsus.com Cc: gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, visionsofalice@redchan.it, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, rms@gnu.org, bruce@perens.com, bkuhn@sfconservancy.org, editor@lwn.net, neil@brown.name, labbott@redhat.com, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org, tglx@linutronix.de, olof@lixom.net, clm@fb.com, mishi@linux.com, linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: The linux devs can rescind their license grant. In-Reply-To: Eric S. Raymond's message of Fri, 26 Oct 2018 11:50:01 -0400 <20181026155001.GA6327@thyrsus.com> References: <20181020134908.GA32218@kroah.com> <87y3ar80ac.fsf@notabene.neil.brown.name> <185b786a2bd6e8d527dca161dc42e4f1@redchan.it> <20181025081911.GB11343@kroah.com> <20181025193901.GD26403@thyrsus.com> <849-Fri26Oct2018091533-0400-eben@harlan.sflc-vpn> <20181026155001.GA6327@thyrsus.com> From: Eben Moglen Reply-To: Eben Moglen Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Friday, 26 October 2018, Eric S. Raymond wrote: Eben Moglen : > reputational damage is *specifically* recognized as grounds for relief. > > No. Reputational damage is not mentioned at all, let alone > specifically recognized. I have no difficulty in finding the word "reputation" in the brief in in proximity with the phrase "increasing [the programmer's] recognition i The parties' briefs are not the court opinion, and don't represent what was decided. Wrong document. I linked to the opinion in my message. Eben