From: Julien Grall <julien.grall@arm.com>
To: John Ogness <john.ogness@linutronix.de>
Cc: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-rt-users <linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Dave P Martin <Dave.Martin@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] v5.0.3-rt1
Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2019 10:26:31 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <28ab7caf-1ada-1c39-c2f9-cd69b2376ef8@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87imw7qm2p.fsf@linutronix.de>
Hi John,
On 3/25/19 10:34 AM, John Ogness wrote:
> On 2019-03-25, Julien Grall <julien.grall@arm.com> wrote:
>> [...]
>> [ 1.169151] 002: Serial: AMBA PL011 UART driver
>> [ 1.254891] 002: 7ff80000.uart: ttyAMA0 at MMIO 0x7ff80000 (irq = 32, base_baud = 0) is a PL011 rev3
>> [ 1.255007] 002: printk: console [ttyAMA0] enabled
>
> The ttyAMA drivers do not have support for atomic printing, so it is not
> the new atomic feature that is causing the mangling. For your setup, all
> printk console printing is being handled within a specific context, the
> printk kernel thread.
This series is somehow making worst when using ttyAMA0. I haven't see
any mangling with 4.19-rt.
>
> It looks to me like some userspace application (systemd?) is writing
> directly to /dev/ttyAMA0. If the kernel is also writing to this device
> (because it is setup as a console), then the output will be
> mangled. There is no high-level synchronization between console output
> and directly writing to UART devices. Maybe you need to set your
> loglevel so that the kernel does not do the printing? For example,
> loglevel=1?
I am a bit confused with your suggestion. This would basically means I
would not be able to see kernel warning. So this would impair any
development on Linux-rt.
>
> You should see this problem with older kernel versions as well.
I have tried with 4.19-rt and didn't see a similar issue. The trace
comes pretty clean in one go. With 5.0-rt, the trace never come clean.
Cheers,
--
Julien Grall
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-03-26 10:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-03-20 17:15 [ANNOUNCE] v5.0.3-rt1 Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2019-03-22 18:52 ` Julien Grall
2019-03-25 8:13 ` John Ogness
2019-03-25 10:18 ` Julien Grall
2019-03-25 10:34 ` John Ogness
2019-03-26 10:26 ` Julien Grall [this message]
2019-03-26 16:04 ` John Ogness
2019-03-27 18:33 ` [PATCH 1/4] printk: An all-in-one commit to fix build failures Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2019-03-27 18:33 ` [PATCH 2/4] powerpc/stackprotector: work around stack-guard init from atomic Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2019-05-10 21:46 ` Steven Rostedt
2019-03-27 18:33 ` [PATCH 3/4] powerpc/pseries/iommu: Use a locallock instead local_irq_save() Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2019-03-27 18:33 ` [PATCH 4/4] powerpc: reshuffle TIF bits Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=28ab7caf-1ada-1c39-c2f9-cd69b2376ef8@arm.com \
--to=julien.grall@arm.com \
--cc=Dave.Martin@arm.com \
--cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=john.ogness@linutronix.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).