Am Montag, 15. September 2014, 09:59:23 schrieb Mark Brown:
> On Sun, Sep 14, 2014 at 09:23:02PM +0200, Heiko Stuebner wrote:
> > There is a high potential of more than one of those regulators existing
> > on a board, so name the regulator according to the name provided in the
> > initdata instead of statically.
> 
> No, this is pointless and broken.  The core will already use the
> board-specific name to identify the regulator in diagnostics and so on,
> the name being supplied here is supposed to describe the regulator
> within the device.

ok, sorry for the mess-up

I've just tested, patches 3-5 apply and work correctly without this one, so do 
you want to apply them like this or a resend of last 3?


Heiko