From: "Martin J. Bligh" <mbligh@aracnet.com>
To: William Lee Irwin III <wli@holomorphy.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: percpu-2.5.63-bk5-1 (properly generated)
Date: Mon, 03 Mar 2003 09:40:01 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <29220000.1046713200@[10.10.2.4]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20030303014320.GM1195@holomorphy.com>
> On Sun, Mar 02, 2003 at 04:07:01PM -0800, Martin J. Bligh wrote:
>> Failing that, if you can split it into 3 or 4 patches along the lines I
>> suggested earlier, I'll try benching each bit seperately for you.
>
> Last ditch effort. No per_node stuff at all, and no new per_cpu users.
OK, that seems to get rid of the SDET degradation, but I rigged up the
same test you were doing (make -j) and see only marginal improvement
from the full patch (pernode2) ... not the 6s you were seeing.
Kernbench: (make -j N vmlinux, where N = 2 x num_cpus)
Elapsed System User CPU
2.5.63-mjb2 44.09 94.38 557.26 1477.00
2.5.63-mjb2-pernode2 44.54 96.38 557.30 1466.75
2.5.63-mjb2-pernode3 44.01 95.22 556.69 1481.25
Kernbench: (make -j N vmlinux, where N = 16 x num_cpus)
Elapsed System User CPU
2.5.63-mjb2 45.53 118.06 560.48 1489.50
2.5.63-mjb2-pernode2 45.25 116.68 561.28 1497.50
2.5.63-mjb2-pernode3 45.30 116.91 559.82 1492.00
Kernbench: (make -j vmlinux, maximal tasks)
Elapsed System User CPU
2.5.63-mjb2 45.17 117.80 560.62 1500.50
2.5.63-mjb2-pernode2 44.91 115.95 560.98 1505.25
2.5.63-mjb2-pernode3 45.47 118.07 560.25 1491.75
-pernode2 was your full patch with the fix you sent, -pernode3 was the
smaller patch you sent last. Can you try to reproduce the improvment
were seeing, and grab a before and after profile? I don't seem to be
able to replicate it.
M.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-03-03 17:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-03-02 18:24 percpu-2.5.63-bk5-1 (properly generated) Martin J. Bligh
2003-03-02 20:24 ` William Lee Irwin III
2003-03-02 20:46 ` Martin J. Bligh
2003-03-02 21:06 ` William Lee Irwin III
2003-03-02 21:58 ` Martin J. Bligh
2003-03-02 22:10 ` William Lee Irwin III
2003-03-02 23:13 ` Martin J. Bligh
2003-03-02 23:42 ` William Lee Irwin III
2003-03-03 0:07 ` Martin J. Bligh
2003-03-03 1:43 ` William Lee Irwin III
2003-03-03 17:40 ` Martin J. Bligh [this message]
2003-03-03 22:51 ` William Lee Irwin III
2003-03-03 23:30 ` Martin J. Bligh
2003-03-04 0:14 ` William Lee Irwin III
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-03-02 11:07 William Lee Irwin III
2003-03-02 13:15 ` William Lee Irwin III
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='29220000.1046713200@[10.10.2.4]' \
--to=mbligh@aracnet.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=wli@holomorphy.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).