linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
To: Linux PM <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux ACPI <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
	Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>,
	Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>,
	Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>
Subject: [RFC][PATCH 1/6] ACPI: processor: Export function to claim _CST control
Date: Fri, 06 Dec 2019 10:31:04 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2985992.BQKmCqvNrW@kreacher> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2037014.bnAicLLH9b@kreacher>

From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

The intel_idle driver will be modified to use ACPI _CST subsequently
and it will need to notify the platform firmware of that if
acpi_gbl_FADT.cst_control is set, so add a routine for this purpose,
acpi_processor_claim_cst_control(), to acpi_processor.c (so that it
is always present which is required by intel_idle) and export it
to allow the ACPI processor driver (which is modular) to call it.

No intentional functional impact.

Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
---
 drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c |   25 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
 drivers/acpi/processor_idle.c |   12 ++++--------
 include/linux/acpi.h          |    6 ++++++
 3 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

Index: linux-pm/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c
===================================================================
--- linux-pm.orig/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c
+++ linux-pm/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c
@@ -705,3 +705,28 @@ void __init acpi_processor_init(void)
 	acpi_scan_add_handler_with_hotplug(&processor_handler, "processor");
 	acpi_scan_add_handler(&processor_container_handler);
 }
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_PROCESSOR_CSTATE
+/**
+ * acpi_processor_claim_cst_control - Request _CST control from the platform.
+ */
+bool acpi_processor_claim_cst_control(void)
+{
+	static bool cst_control_claimed;
+	acpi_status status;
+
+	if (!acpi_gbl_FADT.cst_control || cst_control_claimed)
+		return true;
+
+	status = acpi_os_write_port(acpi_gbl_FADT.smi_command,
+				    acpi_gbl_FADT.cst_control, 8);
+	if (ACPI_FAILURE(status)) {
+		pr_warn("ACPI: Failed to claim processor _CST control\n");
+		return false;
+	}
+
+	cst_control_claimed = true;
+	return true;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(acpi_processor_claim_cst_control);
+#endif /* CONFIG_ACPI_PROCESSOR_CSTATE */
Index: linux-pm/drivers/acpi/processor_idle.c
===================================================================
--- linux-pm.orig/drivers/acpi/processor_idle.c
+++ linux-pm/drivers/acpi/processor_idle.c
@@ -909,7 +909,6 @@ static int acpi_processor_setup_cstates(
 
 static inline void acpi_processor_cstate_first_run_checks(void)
 {
-	acpi_status status;
 	static int first_run;
 
 	if (first_run)
@@ -921,13 +920,10 @@ static inline void acpi_processor_cstate
 			  max_cstate);
 	first_run++;
 
-	if (acpi_gbl_FADT.cst_control && !nocst) {
-		status = acpi_os_write_port(acpi_gbl_FADT.smi_command,
-					    acpi_gbl_FADT.cst_control, 8);
-		if (ACPI_FAILURE(status))
-			ACPI_EXCEPTION((AE_INFO, status,
-					"Notifying BIOS of _CST ability failed"));
-	}
+	if (nocst)
+		return;
+
+	acpi_processor_claim_cst_control();
 }
 #else
 
Index: linux-pm/include/linux/acpi.h
===================================================================
--- linux-pm.orig/include/linux/acpi.h
+++ linux-pm/include/linux/acpi.h
@@ -279,6 +279,12 @@ static inline bool invalid_phys_cpuid(ph
 
 /* Validate the processor object's proc_id */
 bool acpi_duplicate_processor_id(int proc_id);
+/* Processor _CTS control */
+#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_PROCESSOR_CSTATE
+bool acpi_processor_claim_cst_control(void);
+#else
+static inline bool acpi_processor_claim_cst_control(void) { return false; }
+#endif
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_HOTPLUG_CPU
 /* Arch dependent functions for cpu hotplug support */




  reply	other threads:[~2019-12-06  9:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-12-06  9:28 [RFC][PATCH 0/6] cpuidle: intel_idle: Use ACPI _CTS to get idle states information Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-12-06  9:31 ` Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]
2019-12-06  9:32 ` [RFC][PATCH 2/6] ACPI: processor: Introduce acpi_processor_evaluate_cst() Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-12-06  9:36 ` [RFC][PATCH 3/6] ACPI: processor: Clean up acpi_processor_evaluate_cst() Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-12-06  9:37 ` [RFC][PATCH 4/6] ACPI: processor: Export acpi_processor_evaluate_cst() Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-12-06  9:46 ` [RFC][PATCH 5/6] intel_idle: Refactor intel_idle_cpuidle_driver_init() Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-12-06  9:46 ` [RFC][PATCH 6/6] intel_idle: Use ACPI _CST for processor models without C-state tables Rafael J. Wysocki

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2985992.BQKmCqvNrW@kreacher \
    --to=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
    --cc=len.brown@intel.com \
    --cc=lenb@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com \
    --subject='Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/6] ACPI: processor: Export function to claim _CST control' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
on how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox